Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
With all the protest going on in WI, and Walker not willing to negotiate his hardline stance, do you think he will face a recall vote?
With all the protest going on in WI, and Walker not willing to negotiate his hardline stance, do you think he will face a recall vote?
There's no "right" of collective bargaining.
The *privilege* was extended by the state...It only follows that it may be taken away.
On top if that, the only part of collective bargaining being taken away is that involving benefits, not pay.
There's no "right" of collective bargaining.
The *privilege* was extended by the state...It only follows that it may be taken away.
On top if that, the only part of collective bargaining being taken away is that involving benefits, not pay.
when the state agreed to give them collective bargaining "rights" its because a give right. (not the same as an inalienable right) thats what i meant by right.
im just wondering what the opinion is. it seems the majority of the WI public doesnt like his hardline stance. if he keeps pushing to take away rights, how long will people accept this..
There's no "right" of collective bargaining.
The *privilege* was extended by the state...It only follows that it may be taken away.
On top if that, the only part of collective bargaining being taken away is that involving benefits, not pay.
when the state agreed to give them collective bargaining "rights" its became a given right. (not the same as an inalienable right) thats what i meant by right.
Um....WRONG-O!!There's no "right" of collective bargaining.
The *privilege* was extended by the state...It only follows that it may be taken away.
On top if that, the only part of collective bargaining being taken away is that involving benefits, not pay.
when the state agreed to give them collective bargaining "rights" its became a given right. (not the same as an inalienable right) thats what i meant by right.
idiot, in order to get a recall on the ballot, it first has be a petition signed by enough voters. hence do you think he will "face" a recall vote. I didnt asked if he would be recalled.
There's no "right" of collective bargaining.
The *privilege* was extended by the state...It only follows that it may be taken away.
On top if that, the only part of collective bargaining being taken away is that involving benefits, not pay.
when the state agreed to give them collective bargaining "rights" its became a given right. (not the same as an inalienable right) thats what i meant by right.
Their "right" was the right to ask for collective bargaining.
Collective bargaining was a negotiated item in a contract.
i simply see this as a contract dispute. the unions have a contract in place with the state. the state no longer likes that contract, so they need to negotiate a new one. instead walker simply wants to take away their ability to negotiate for the whole, and that is wrong.
when the state agreed to give them collective bargaining "rights" its became a given right. (not the same as an inalienable right) thats what i meant by right.
Their "right" was the right to ask for collective bargaining.
Collective bargaining was a negotiated item in a contract.
youre correct. they were granted the rights of collective bargaining per the contract. the semantics of this isnt the issue i wanted to discuss.
i simply see this as a contract dispute. the unions have a contract in place with the state. the state no longer likes that contract, so they need to negotiate a new one. instead walker simply wants to take away their ability to negotiate for the whole, and that is wrong.
A dude with an (R) next to his name who won't cave...It's about time.Somebody has to bite the bullet and correct the situation. Walker ran on a promise to do so and he is honoring that promise. The man is not evil or incompetent or intractable. He looks like a real American hero to a whole lot of us.
when the state agreed to give them collective bargaining "rights" its became a given right. (not the same as an inalienable right) thats what i meant by right.
Their "right" was the right to ask for collective bargaining.
Collective bargaining was a negotiated item in a contract.
youre correct. they were granted the rights of collective bargaining per the contract. the semantics of this isnt the issue i wanted to discuss.
i simply see this as a contract dispute. the unions have a contract in place with the state. the state no longer likes that contract, so they need to negotiate a new one. instead walker simply wants to take away their ability to negotiate for the whole, and that is wrong.