SERIOUS question for all Trump acolytes on this forum....

[emilynghiem]

There are THREE ways to interpret Mueller's report (with its Barr redactions)

LEGALLY........Trump cannot be indicted based on DOJ policy (NOT law)

POLITICALLY...........Trump is as guilty as OJ Simpson

MORALLY.........Trump is as guilty as Charlie Manson

Dear nat4900 the three ways I see people interpreting this

LIBERALS - using it as bait, to imply "as much as possible" without requiring proof or stating anything false to get in trouble for that

CONSERVATIVES - innocent until proven guilty - if there was anything they could have gotten Trump on at all, they would have stated so

TAXPAYERS seeing this as a waste - this distraction is just costing more money we can't afford when we could be investigating worse cases; too bad neither side is pushing the wrongdoers to pay the costs that are dumped on taxpayers because neither side can agree

 

[Redfish]

those who want a growing economy, a strong military, a secure border, fair trade relations, reduced government control on our lives, a working healthcare system, care for our veterans, and low unemployment.

Gee, you must then have "loved" Obama.....LMAO

since he did none of those things, NO.

 

[Redfish]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

TEN incidences of Obstruction of Justice spelled out by Mueller

SIX incidences out of collusion spelled out by Mueller

but no grounds for indictments of anyone. The witch hunt failed, its over.

 

[whitehall]

A "serious" question as opposed to the usual hate speech? There never was any evidence of the non-crime of "collusion". Mueller's job was to cover up the attempted coup by renegade factions of the FBI.

 

[nat4900]

Mueller's job was to cover up the attempted coup by renegade factions of the FBI.

Well, THAT settles it........

(Who turns on their computer for these fucking morons??? Surely that task would be a serious challenge for them....LOL)

 

[deanrd]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

Not gonna happen. Most of them don’t read more than cereal boxes and that’s only to see if there’s a prize inside.. They can’t comprehend what they read. And to them learning is something that must be avoided at all costs.

 

[nat4900]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

Had Mueller "exonerated" Trump, the damn report would have been ONE paragraph.....
Given the current policy by the DOj that a sitting president cannot be indicted, Mueller CLEARLY stated that the POLITICAL /LEGISLATIVE (Congress) recourse needs to be enacted.........

Barr, being a stooge of Trump, did his job as any stooge would have done.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

Then Pelosi better get to work and impeach Trump and if not then blame her...

 

[nat4900]

Then Pelosi better get to work and impeach Trump and if not then blame her...

patience, son.......have patience......lol

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

GREAT news...........I would very much hate if fucked up morons like you somehow voted as I did....THANKS !!!

I find many on your side somehow believe that the opinion of Trump voters will be changed by these investigations. It won’t; and they make the Left look stupid to many voters.

No one cares what Cult45 thinks. No input required.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Then Pelosi better get to work and impeach Trump and if not then blame her...

patience, son.......have patience......lol

1. I am older than you seeing you forgot the Bush years and Pelosi did nothing.

2. Pelosi is smarter than you...

 

[Anathema]

No one cares what Cult45 thinks. No input required.

You’ll care when Cult45 starts picking up our .45 Colts and using them for exactly what John Browning intended them to be used for.

 

[nat4900]

No one cares what Cult45 thinks. No input required.

You’ll care when Cult45 starts picking up our .45 Colts and using them for exactly what John Browning intended them to be used for.

I'm telling you, anathema.....people would be even MORE terrified of you if your threaten them with your dirty diapers.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

No one cares what Cult45 thinks. No input required.

You’ll care when Cult45 starts picking up our .45 Colts and using them for exactly what John Browning intended them to be used for.

Don't miss. I won't.

 

[Anathema]

Don't miss. I won't.

Neither will I. Even if I did - it would be better to be dead than to live in the sort of nation you Leftists prefer.

 

[Jarlaxle]

So what are you waiting for, then? By all means, put us out of your misery!

 

[Indeependent]

No one cares what Cult45 thinks. No input required.

You’ll care when Cult45 starts picking up our .45 Colts and using them for exactly what John Browning intended them to be used for.

I'm telling you, anathema.....people would be even MORE terrified of you if your threaten them with your dirty diapers.

You’re in your 80s so you would know.

 

[nat4900]

ou’re in your 80s so you would know.

I'm just so hurt by your half-WIT...............LMAO

 

[Markle]

Not gonna happen. Most of them [conseratives] don’t read more than cereal boxes and that’s only to see if there’s a prize inside.. They can’t comprehend what they read. And to them learning is something that must be avoided at all costs.

Why are all your posts about denigrating people to whom you are opposed and not toward proving their points wrong?

You should also be aware that Conservatives are far more likely to read opposing views than are Progressives. The reason is simple. Conservatives views are built on FACTS. Those are easily defended. Progressives views are based on FEELINGS.

Progressives do not really want to solve problems, they demand to spend someone else's money so THEY feel better. That's so much more difficult to defend than facts so they resort to name calling.

 

[Redfish]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

Had Mueller "exonerated" Trump, the damn report would have been ONE paragraph.....
Given the current policy by the DOj that a sitting president cannot be indicted, Mueller CLEARLY stated that the POLITICAL /LEGISLATIVE (Congress) recourse needs to be enacted.........

Barr, being a stooge of Trump, did his job as any stooge would have done.

please look up exonerate in the dictionary. When an investigation finds nothing illegal, the subject of the investigation has been exonerated. Unless of course your name is Clinton, then the investigators explain all of the violations of law and let you go because you didn't "intend" to break the law, or were too dumb to know that you did.