Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) - Time To Consider Syria Action

Again..you are looking at "doable" vs. "non-doable". And it hurts your argument to suggest that President Obama is "supporting" the muslim brotherhood. He's actually supporting Democracy in the Middle East. It may not look exactly like Democracy around the world, but it's far better to let people chose their leadership..then it is to have a military dictator in place under "emergency" rule for 30 years..as was the case of Mubarak and Egypt. Why was it doable in Egypt? Well the US was picking up the tab for their military. We don't have the same influence in Iran.

And I am 100% in support of killing Gaddafi. He deserved missile up his ass after Lockerbie.

Against the law. There's treaties in place, that we signed, keeping us from assassinating world leaders.

Personnally, I'd like to capture him and turn him over to his own people.

Getting missiled is a quick and painless death, if it hits close enough.

Weeks - months living in fear of what's coming, on the other hand...

No that's justice.

1988 is when it happened. A warrant should be put out for his arrest..and failure to comply..well you know..

You get "Bin Ladened"..:lol:

RRRRRAT A TAT TAT

Don't move!!

RRRRRAT A TAT TAT

:eusa_angel:
 
Nato only took the lead so Obama could avoid congressional approval, dont kid yourself, Obama is a war monger and will put our troops in harms way any chance he can get to influence middle eastern countries in a way that we as Americans do not want them influenced, Take Egypt for example, the muslim brotherhood took that over from a president that supported America for over 30 years...and Obama supported the uprising their!!! But in Iran, when the people wanted to get rid of Achmamonkey face "A real threat to liberty on a global scale and a future nuclear threat" Obama was dead silent. Obama is making all the wrong choices for America, all the wrong choices. He does not have the balls to make the hard choices like removing a serious threat, he took his street agitator skills to a global level and is now agitating third world countries into uprisings. He may in fact be the 3rd coming of the antichrist. *Just my 2 cents.

Again..you are looking at "doable" vs. "non-doable". And it hurts your argument to suggest that President Obama is "supporting" the muslim brotherhood. He's actually supporting Democracy in the Middle East. It may not look exactly like Democracy around the world, but it's far better to let people chose their leadership..then it is to have a military dictator in place under "emergency" rule for 30 years..as was the case of Mubarak and Egypt. Why was it doable in Egypt? Well the US was picking up the tab for their military. We don't have the same influence in Iran.

And I am 100% in support of killing Gaddafi. He deserved missile up his ass after Lockerbie.

I agree on Gaggafi, but disagree on Iran, if anyone should have had the full support of the United States in the name of Democracy, it should have been the Iranian people wanting rid of MonkeyFace, that dude has already admitted he will nuke Israel, our closest allie right now, off the face of the planet "Which is why I believe Obama left him alone", apparently Obama wants rid of Israel also, or he would not have turned a cheek on them a few weeks back by asking them to go back to the 67 borders and set themselves up for annihilation.

First off Ahmadinejad is not the real power in Iran...he's the face of it. That gets shared between the military and the supreme council. Secondly..we have no influence in Iran, none. Even the opposition to Ahmadinejad, hates the idea of US involvement more then the status quo. That's a big factor. And while there may be some saber rattling on the part of Iran..one has to remember they have not invaded another country for almost 100 years. And they are subject to constant spook operations against them from the west. After the invasion of Iraq..terrorism went up wildly in Iran..mostly from the PKK. And while there is nothing concrete about this..I think it's a safe bet they've gotten some of their funding from the US.

Secondly..there is no indication that President Obama wants to get "rid" of Israel. What he is looking to do..is solve the Palestinian problem. You can't do that without concessions from both sides. Even with all the bluster of Netinyahu, he's probably pleased someone is addressing this. Of course, him being right wing, he can't come out and say that..but it's to the advantage of the Israelis that this get settled..and soon. If President Obama were looking to get "rid" of Israel..he'd be calling on the US to defund the country. He is not. And he didn't call for a return to 67 borders..which is by the way what the UN has called for and Israel has completely ignored..he's called for that as a starting point with land swaps. Almost the very same thing Netinyahu called for in his speech with Congress..without using the 67 borders line. But he did refer to borders..and at the present date..none are recognized by anyone.
 
Against the law. There's treaties in place, that we signed, keeping us from assassinating world leaders.

Personnally, I'd like to capture him and turn him over to his own people.

Getting missiled is a quick and painless death, if it hits close enough.

Weeks - months living in fear of what's coming, on the other hand...

No that's justice.

1988 is when it happened. A warrant should be put out for his arrest..and failure to comply..well you know..

You get "Bin Ladened"..:lol:

RRRRRAT A TAT TAT

Don't move!!

RRRRRAT A TAT TAT

:eusa_angel:

:lol::clap2:
 
Lindsey Graham is wrong. We're already spending a $Billion bombing & killing Libyans. So forget about right or wrong. Where do they get all these $Billions to bomb & kill? Graham has always been Democrat-Light so i'm not surprised he's pushing this. He's just wrong.
 
Again..you are looking at "doable" vs. "non-doable". And it hurts your argument to suggest that President Obama is "supporting" the muslim brotherhood. He's actually supporting Democracy in the Middle East. It may not look exactly like Democracy around the world, but it's far better to let people chose their leadership..then it is to have a military dictator in place under "emergency" rule for 30 years..as was the case of Mubarak and Egypt. Why was it doable in Egypt? Well the US was picking up the tab for their military. We don't have the same influence in Iran.

And I am 100% in support of killing Gaddafi. He deserved missile up his ass after Lockerbie.
Then you think the invasion of Iraq was a good thing.
 
Yea, we should sit back and do nothing while innocent people get slaughtered by their government. Is there no one that Democrats really care about?

Syria has got a very serious military and Assad is well liked on the Arab street. Libya was something that was basically "doable" because it the Arabs hate Gaddafi, Gaddafi was directly linked to a terrorist attack that killed over 200 Americans..and NATO took the lead.


189 is not 'over 200'. Yet again, we're claiming victims that are not ours to claim. 21 countries lost citizens in the Lockerbie bombing. 21. Not 1. Britain lost 43 - and 11 of them weren't on the damned plane. They died when the plane hit the village.
 
Again..you are looking at "doable" vs. "non-doable". And it hurts your argument to suggest that President Obama is "supporting" the muslim brotherhood. He's actually supporting Democracy in the Middle East. It may not look exactly like Democracy around the world, but it's far better to let people chose their leadership..then it is to have a military dictator in place under "emergency" rule for 30 years..as was the case of Mubarak and Egypt. Why was it doable in Egypt? Well the US was picking up the tab for their military. We don't have the same influence in Iran.

And I am 100% in support of killing Gaddafi. He deserved missile up his ass after Lockerbie.
Then you think the invasion of Iraq was a good thing.

When did we invade Egypt or Libya?

Really..are you in the military? You post this shit?

Do you know the difference between invasion and bombing?

I thought the invasion and conquering of Iraq was a huge war crime.
 
Damned if you do,damned if you don't. Aggressive Foreign Interventionism is a Lose/Lose in the end. We shouldn't be spending another $Billion on bombing & killing in Libya and we certainly shouldn't do it in Syria either. When does this stuff end? Will there ever be day when our Country isn't bombing & killing someone somewhere around the World? We've been in non-stop War for the last 70yrs. When will it ever end?
 
Again..you are looking at "doable" vs. "non-doable". And it hurts your argument to suggest that President Obama is "supporting" the muslim brotherhood. He's actually supporting Democracy in the Middle East. It may not look exactly like Democracy around the world, but it's far better to let people chose their leadership..then it is to have a military dictator in place under "emergency" rule for 30 years..as was the case of Mubarak and Egypt. Why was it doable in Egypt? Well the US was picking up the tab for their military. We don't have the same influence in Iran.

And I am 100% in support of killing Gaddafi. He deserved missile up his ass after Lockerbie.
Then you think the invasion of Iraq was a good thing.

When did we invade Egypt or Libya?

Really..are you in the military? You post this shit?

Do you know the difference between invasion and bombing?

I thought the invasion and conquering of Iraq was a huge war crime.

Bombing is a form of invasion.
 
Damned if you do,damned if you don't. Aggressive Foreign Interventionism is a Lose/Lose in the end. We shouldn't be spending another $Billion on bombing & killing in Libya and we certainly shouldn't do it in Syria either. When does this stuff end? Will there ever be day when our Country isn't bombing & killing someone somewhere around the World? We've been in non-stop War for the last 70yrs. When will it ever end?

We are killing Lybians to keep Lybians from killing them. Since that is such a wonderfull idea, we are going to kill Syrians so other Syrians don't have too.

That's just how kind we are.
 
Damned if you do,damned if you don't. Aggressive Foreign Interventionism is a Lose/Lose in the end. We shouldn't be spending another $Billion on bombing & killing in Libya and we certainly shouldn't do it in Syria either. When does this stuff end? Will there ever be day when our Country isn't bombing & killing someone somewhere around the World? We've been in non-stop War for the last 70yrs. When will it ever end?

We are killing Lybians to keep Lybians from killing them. Since that is such a wonderfull idea, we are going to kill Syrians so other Syrians don't have too.

That's just how kind we are.

Well, the self proclaimed party of "compassion" is in charge.
 
Damned if you do,damned if you don't. Aggressive Foreign Interventionism is a Lose/Lose in the end. We shouldn't be spending another $Billion on bombing & killing in Libya and we certainly shouldn't do it in Syria either. When does this stuff end? Will there ever be day when our Country isn't bombing & killing someone somewhere around the World? We've been in non-stop War for the last 70yrs. When will it ever end?

We are killing Lybians to keep Lybians from killing them. Since that is such a wonderfull idea, we are going to kill Syrians so other Syrians don't have too.

That's just how kind we are.

Well, the self proclaimed party of "compassion" is in charge.

That's why we are using bombs instead of bullets.

If you get shot, fatally, it may take awhile to bleed out. But a missle-bomb is far more likely to turn you into kibble. No pain at all.

That's the height of compassion.
 
Damned if you do,damned if you don't. Aggressive Foreign Interventionism is a Lose/Lose in the end. We shouldn't be spending another $Billion on bombing & killing in Libya and we certainly shouldn't do it in Syria either. When does this stuff end? Will there ever be day when our Country isn't bombing & killing someone somewhere around the World? We've been in non-stop War for the last 70yrs. When will it ever end?

Warmongering has become such a normal thing to the 2 status quo parties and their followers, they think if there isn't a certain about of warmongering going on that we either aren't killing enough ppl or we aren't "safe."
 
Damned if you do,damned if you don't. Aggressive Foreign Interventionism is a Lose/Lose in the end. We shouldn't be spending another $Billion on bombing & killing in Libya and we certainly shouldn't do it in Syria either. When does this stuff end? Will there ever be day when our Country isn't bombing & killing someone somewhere around the World? We've been in non-stop War for the last 70yrs. When will it ever end?

Warmongering has become such a normal thing to the 2 status quo parties and their followers, they think if there isn't a certain about of warmongering going on that we either aren't killing enough ppl or we aren't "safe."

We are a violent society.
 
Damned if you do,damned if you don't. Aggressive Foreign Interventionism is a Lose/Lose in the end. We shouldn't be spending another $Billion on bombing & killing in Libya and we certainly shouldn't do it in Syria either. When does this stuff end? Will there ever be day when our Country isn't bombing & killing someone somewhere around the World? We've been in non-stop War for the last 70yrs. When will it ever end?

Warmongering has become such a normal thing to the 2 status quo parties and their followers, they think if there isn't a certain about of warmongering going on that we either aren't killing enough ppl or we aren't "safe."

We are a violent society.

We need a Martin Luther King Jr now more than ever.
 

Forum List

Back
Top