Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) - Time To Consider Syria Action

Discussion in 'Politics' started by rdean, Jun 13, 2011.

  1. rdean
    Offline

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,129
    Thanks Received:
    6,896
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +14,974
    “If it made sense to protect the Libyan people against Gadhafi, and it did because they were going to get slaughtered if we hadn’t sent NATO in when he was on the outskirts of Benghazi, the question for the world [is], have we gotten to that point in Syria,” Graham said on the CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

    Graham: Time To Consider Syria Action | FrumForum

    Graham made the talk show circuit on Sunday.

    This is hilarious. We've said it before, no matter what Obama does, Republicans are going to cry and cry and cry "foul". They hate the guy that much.

    First screaming that he go into Libya, then screaming when he does.

    Is Syria next?

    Is there a Muslim country Republicans don't want to invade?

    Imagine if McCain were president?
     
  2. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Yea, we should sit back and do nothing while innocent people get slaughtered by their government. Is there no one that Democrats really care about?
     
  3. grunt11b
    Offline

    grunt11b VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,649
    Thanks Received:
    500
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    In Reality
    Ratings:
    +501
    Lyndsey Graham is just another leftist progressive posing as a Republican "See Olympia Snow and Lisa Murkoski for other examples". He needs to be voted out just like the rest of those turds. Noone that lives in reality takes him serious anyways.
     
  4. Two Thumbs
    Offline

    Two Thumbs Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    33,450
    Thanks Received:
    5,786
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Where ever I go, there I am.
    Ratings:
    +11,589
    damn you're an idiot

    We are already killing people in Syria. Big 0 sent in the drones months ago.

    But it's some how majically the fault of some GOPers that he's a blood thirsty war monger?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    Syria has got a very serious military and Assad is well liked on the Arab street. Libya was something that was basically "doable" because it the Arabs hate Gaddafi, Gaddafi was directly linked to a terrorist attack that killed over 200 Americans..and NATO took the lead.
     
  6. Dr.Drock
    Offline

    Dr.Drock Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    9,680
    Thanks Received:
    940
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +940
    Syria has oil, so it is likely that Obama will attack them again, and it is likely that just like in Libya he'll end up giving billions of US taxpayer dollars to Al-Qaeda because now they're our allies and "freedom fighters."
     
  7. grunt11b
    Offline

    grunt11b VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,649
    Thanks Received:
    500
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    In Reality
    Ratings:
    +501
    Nato only took the lead so Obama could avoid congressional approval, dont kid yourself, Obama is a war monger and will put our troops in harms way any chance he can get to influence middle eastern countries in a way that we as Americans do not want them influenced, Take Egypt for example, the muslim brotherhood took that over from a president that supported America for over 30 years...and Obama supported the uprising their!!! But in Iran, when the people wanted to get rid of Achmamonkey face "A real threat to liberty on a global scale and a future nuclear threat" Obama was dead silent. Obama is making all the wrong choices for America, all the wrong choices. He does not have the balls to make the hard choices like removing a serious threat, he took his street agitator skills to a global level and is now agitating third world countries into uprisings. He may in fact be the 3rd coming of the antichrist. *Just my 2 cents.
     
  8. Dr.Drock
    Offline

    Dr.Drock Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    9,680
    Thanks Received:
    940
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +940
    How long will RDean be able to blame Obama's warmongering, anti-diplomacy foreign policy on the GOP?

    Can he keep it up for 8 years?
     
  9. Soggy in NOLA
    Online

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,762
    Thanks Received:
    4,319
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,478
    Yes.

    Credibly, no.
     
  10. Two Thumbs
    Offline

    Two Thumbs Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    33,450
    Thanks Received:
    5,786
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Where ever I go, there I am.
    Ratings:
    +11,589
    That was Reagan. remember; "The Line Of Death"?
    Gadd drew a line in the sea saying if we crossed this we would die. So Reagan parked a fleet on the other side. Then Gadd drew another one and Reagan crossed it again.

    The current war is about oil. the EU doesn't give a shit about arabs killing each other.
     

Share This Page