Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You guys are mistaking the wing nuts as conservatives. They are not. They are reactionaries and are as great a danger as are the whacko left. I knew things were going south when the Bush propaganda machine was trying to compare him with Winston Churchill after 9-11. Bush did well after the strike (certainly better than Gore), but to compare Bush to Churchill, the greatest defender of democracy and liberty in the 20th century?
We lost because of Palin, that stats are quite clear about that. If Romney had been on the ticket, with the economy beginning to sag, we would have had a fighting chance. The GOP cannot win nationally with the whacko extreme right anymore. With a conservative, program, yes. With a reactionary program, no.
You guys are mistaking the wing nuts as conservatives. They are not. They are reactionaries and are as great a danger as are the whacko left. I knew things were going south when the Bush propaganda machine was trying to compare him with Winston Churchill after 9-11. Bush did well after the strike (certainly better than Gore), but to compare Bush to Churchill, the greatest defender of democracy and liberty in the 20th century?
We lost because of Palin, that stats are quite clear about that. If Romney had been on the ticket, with the economy beginning to sag, we would have had a fighting chance. The GOP cannot win nationally with the whacko extreme right anymore. With a conservative, program, yes. With a reactionary program, no.
You are no conservative or Republican----Nice try though. Republicans lost because of John McCain who is a moderate Republican. In fact, if it weren't for Sarah Palin---his campaign crowds would have dwindled down to around 7 people.
It was obvious that Romney wasn't that interested in winning the nomination because he didn't even campaign in the first few caucas around the nation. He threw all his eggs in one basket--& that basket was Florida & he was out.
As the liberal you really are--don't try & disguise yourself as a conservative. Your comments in no way reflect conservatism.
You guys are mistaking the wing nuts as conservatives. They are not. They are reactionaries and are as great a danger as are the whacko left. I knew things were going south when the Bush propaganda machine was trying to compare him with Winston Churchill after 9-11. Bush did well after the strike (certainly better than Gore), but to compare Bush to Churchill, the greatest defender of democracy and liberty in the 20th century?
We lost because of Palin, that stats are quite clear about that. If Romney had been on the ticket, with the economy beginning to sag, we would have had a fighting chance. The GOP cannot win nationally with the whacko extreme right anymore. With a conservative, program, yes. With a reactionary program, no.
You are no conservative or Republican----Nice try though. Republicans lost because of John McCain who is a moderate Republican. In fact, if it weren't for Sarah Palin---his campaign crowds would have dwindled down to around 7 people.
It was obvious that Romney wasn't that interested in winning the nomination because he didn't even campaign in the first few caucas around the nation. He threw all his eggs in one basket--& that basket was Florida & he was out.
As the liberal you really are--don't try & disguise yourself as a conservative. Your comments in no way reflect conservatism.
The race was a virtual tie until the economic meltdown. all the swingstates were tied until sept/october.
It's a pretty stupid strategic maneuver unless he is trying to speak to his extreme base and not Indes, who he should be courting.
This only goes to show that the real Scott Brown is something that the voters should see before election day.
Interesting that he can't even control himself for a couple of more days.
go wingnut go. lol..
tell us all about the "pro america parts of the country". i'm sure that will go over big in massachusetts.
You are no conservative or Republican----Nice try though. Republicans lost because of John McCain who is a moderate Republican. In fact, if it weren't for Sarah Palin---his campaign crowds would have dwindled down to around 7 people.
It was obvious that Romney wasn't that interested in winning the nomination because he didn't even campaign in the first few caucas around the nation. He threw all his eggs in one basket--& that basket was Florida & he was out.
As the liberal you really are--don't try & disguise yourself as a conservative. Your comments in no way reflect conservatism.
The race was a virtual tie until the economic meltdown. all the swingstates were tied until sept/october.
And the ONLY time polls showed John McCain ahead is when Sarah Palin was put on the ticket.
Until America got to know her. If Romney had been on the ticket, he would have torn Biden apart, and he would have chewed up Obama's talking points. That would have allowed McCain to be the wise, grandfatherly type that America needed.[And the ONLY time polls showed John McCain ahead is when Sarah Palin was put on the ticket.
Wing nuts are not conservatives, they are reactionaries. They are not mainstream, and they are abhorred by the center of American politics. The center will not support teabaggers or their stupidities. They have proven it once already. What was the latest popularity poll for Palin: 25%? Yeah, we are going to win with that? Sheer stupidity ally conservatism with the reactionaries.
Your arguments have been demolished over and over, and all you can say is that you don't believe it.
Like I said, you proved my point.
Brown, Coakley, And the Outrage Gap - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com
Thoughts?
My opinion: What an asshole.
For the record Scott:
Ann Dunham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And of course you have a link to Sarah Palin making a comment that Obama was born out of wed lock---
Obviously another liberal who does not have the reading comprehension skills or the attention span of a nat to get through a 413 page book--but think they know something anyway.
I see now the video is at the first link in the OP and now I am laughing at the text below it:
But it’s clear if you watch the video that there’s a broader context: Brown is clearly aligning himself with the Limbaugh wing of the GOP, in which slurs along these lines are standard fare. And as Steve Benen points out, claims about Obama’s illegitimacy were an integral part of the birther craziness.
So will this actually make political waves? If Brown were a Democrat, it would instantly be a huge scandal. The outrage machine would be working overtime. And the news media would, of course, pick it up.
But Democrats don’t have the same kind of outrage infrastructure. Can they nevertheless find a way to use this? I guess we’ll soon find out.
It is clear that woman who posed the scenario about illegitimate children in that interview was the one being an asshole, not Scott Brown.
The interviewer interjected about the status of The President's parents' marriage at his birth. SHE brought it up and Scott Brown responded "I don't know about that" and he then immediately politely moved OFF the topic of the status of the marriage.
Scott Brown was merely trying to answer her "family values" question and illustrate that many good families face similar difficult challenges.
Now all the blogs are buzzing over this old video and wondering how they can spin this lie that Scott Brown is so EXTREME.
The Coakley people have run what sounds like the world's worst campaign, but here's a redemption tip I pass on from a friend: The Democrats should put together a radio ad featuring the Scott Brown innuendo about Obama, and stuff the airwaves tomorrow and Tuesday morning-(not least on African-American stations. Tomorrow's version should start: "A message from the Democratic Party for Martin Luther King Day." Then something about how this election isn't about Coakley, it's about Barack Obama and the misguided Americans who still can't accept that a black man is the legitimate president of the United States. Scott Brown "Doesn't Know" Whether Obama Was Born out of Wedlock | TPMCafe
Your arguments have been demolished over and over, and all you can say is that you don't believe it.
Like I said, you proved my point.
you haven't actually addressed a single point i raised.
if you have, please show me where, and how you either: answered, agreed, or countered said point.
come on hack.....let's see it, because so far, i'm seriously laughing my ass off at you.
And of course you have a link to Sarah Palin making a comment that Obama was born out of wed lock---
Obviously another liberal who does not have the reading comprehension skills or the attention span of a nat to get through a 413 page book--but think they know something anyway.
I see now the video is at the first link in the OP and now I am laughing at the text below it:
It is clear that woman who posed the scenario about illegitimate children in that interview was the one being an asshole, not Scott Brown.
The interviewer interjected about the status of The President's parents' marriage at his birth. SHE brought it up and Scott Brown responded "I don't know about that" and he then immediately politely moved OFF the topic of the status of the marriage.
Scott Brown was merely trying to answer her "family values" question and illustrate that many good families face similar difficult challenges.
Now all the blogs are buzzing over this old video and wondering how they can spin this lie that Scott Brown is so EXTREME.
The Coakley people have run what sounds like the world's worst campaign, but here's a redemption tip I pass on from a friend: The Democrats should put together a radio ad featuring the Scott Brown innuendo about Obama, and stuff the airwaves tomorrow and Tuesday morning-(not least on African-American stations. Tomorrow's version should start: "A message from the Democratic Party for Martin Luther King Day." Then something about how this election isn't about Coakley, it's about Barack Obama and the misguided Americans who still can't accept that a black man is the legitimate president of the United States. Scott Brown "Doesn't Know" Whether Obama Was Born out of Wedlock | TPMCafe
Yeah figures--& I have mentioned this before. ALWAYS READ THE ARTICLE OR WATCH THE VIDEO THAT LIBERALS LINK TOO. They have a habit of picking & choosing out of an article what they want you to know--but leave out 99% of the real detail.
In essense--DOGBERT--just did a big doo-doo. He took this article completely out of context--somehow added Palin's name to it--& then MADE UP a conspiracy theory using the above linked source.
And of course you have a link to Sarah Palin making a comment that Obama was born out of wed lock---
Obviously another liberal who does not have the reading comprehension skills or the attention span of a nat to get through a 413 page book--but think they know something anyway.
I see now the video is at the first link in the OP and now I am laughing at the text below it:
It is clear that woman who posed the scenario about illegitimate children in that interview was the one being an asshole, not Scott Brown.
The interviewer interjected about the status of The President's parents' marriage at his birth. SHE brought it up and Scott Brown responded "I don't know about that" and he then immediately politely moved OFF the topic of the status of the marriage.
Scott Brown was merely trying to answer her "family values" question and illustrate that many good families face similar difficult challenges.
Now all the blogs are buzzing over this old video and wondering how they can spin this lie that Scott Brown is so EXTREME.
The Coakley people have run what sounds like the world's worst campaign, but here's a redemption tip I pass on from a friend: The Democrats should put together a radio ad featuring the Scott Brown innuendo about Obama, and stuff the airwaves tomorrow and Tuesday morning-(not least on African-American stations. Tomorrow's version should start: "A message from the Democratic Party for Martin Luther King Day." Then something about how this election isn't about Coakley, it's about Barack Obama and the misguided Americans who still can't accept that a black man is the legitimate president of the United States. Scott Brown "Doesn't Know" Whether Obama Was Born out of Wedlock | TPMCafe
Yeah figures--& I have mentioned this before. ALWAYS READ THE ARTICLE THAT LIBERALS LINK TOO. They have a habit of picking & choosing out of an article what they want you to know--but leave out 99% of the real detail.
In essense--DOGBERT--just did a big doo-doo. He took this article completely out of context--somehow added Palin's name to it--& then MADE UP a conspiracy theory using the above linked source.
Your arguments have been demolished over and over, and all you can say is that you don't believe it.
Like I said, you proved my point.
you haven't actually addressed a single point i raised.
if you have, please show me where, and how you either: answered, agreed, or countered said point.
come on hack.....let's see it, because so far, i'm seriously laughing my ass off at you.
Many, many times I have shown you the error of your ways, and you simplistically say you disagree and ask for more "proof". Own your own idiocy, Yurt.
And of course you have a link to Sarah Palin making a comment that Obama was born out of wed lock---
Obviously another liberal who does not have the reading comprehension skills or the attention span of a nat to get through a 413 page book--but think they know something anyway.
I see now the video is at the first link in the OP and now I am laughing at the text below it:
It is clear that woman who posed the scenario about illegitimate children in that interview was the one being an asshole, not Scott Brown.
The interviewer interjected about the status of The President's parents' marriage at his birth. SHE brought it up and Scott Brown responded "I don't know about that" and he then immediately politely moved OFF the topic of the status of the marriage.
Scott Brown was merely trying to answer her "family values" question and illustrate that many good families face similar difficult challenges.
Now all the blogs are buzzing over this old video and wondering how they can spin this lie that Scott Brown is so EXTREME.
The Coakley people have run what sounds like the world's worst campaign, but here's a redemption tip I pass on from a friend: The Democrats should put together a radio ad featuring the Scott Brown innuendo about Obama, and stuff the airwaves tomorrow and Tuesday morning-(not least on African-American stations. Tomorrow's version should start: "A message from the Democratic Party for Martin Luther King Day." Then something about how this election isn't about Coakley, it's about Barack Obama and the misguided Americans who still can't accept that a black man is the legitimate president of the United States. Scott Brown "Doesn't Know" Whether Obama Was Born out of Wedlock | TPMCafe
Yeah figures--& I have mentioned this before. ALWAYS READ THE ARTICLE OR WATCH THE VIDEO THAT LIBERALS LINK TOO. They have a habit of picking & choosing out of an article what they want you to know--but leave out 99% of the real detail.
In essense--DOGBERT--just did a big doo-doo. He took this article completely out of context--somehow added Palin's name to it--& then MADE UP a conspiracy theory using the above linked source.
Your arguments have been demolished over and over, and all you can say is that you don't believe it.
Like I said, you proved my point.
you haven't actually addressed a single point i raised.
if you have, please show me where, and how you either: answered, agreed, or countered said point.
come on hack.....let's see it, because so far, i'm seriously laughing my ass off at you.
Many, many times I have shown you the error of your ways, and you simplistically say you disagree and ask for more "proof". Own your own idiocy, Yurt.