He's predicting temperatures to start cooling down in 2017 and we'll have a mini-ice age by 2030. If we see temperatures stagnate until 2017 as he says then others will be forced to sit up and listen. Otherwise, his credibility is out the window.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why and how would Dante be able to discredit a scientist and his supposed findings?Of course you'll. try to discredit him.
Any scientist that tried to prove global warming is a lie gets ignored or squelched.
The emperor has no clothes but you like looking at him naked.
Global warming is a lie. A calculated lie.
He has 6 math degrees.
Wow ! Misty is qualified to be an anti-climate science expertCO2 feeds plants. I learned that in 4th grade.Yawn, but then there is this.....
http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/missing-carbon/
Myth?A correction which blows the global warming myth to hellSo a scientist -- discovers this?
So the scientific community has NOT been lying if this news is taken to be credible. It only means science was incorrect and gets corrected as time goes on? Wow!
Science at work? What will the right wing denier nuts do now, embrace science and scientists? Nah, they'll talk about Al Gore and other shit
evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
CO2 is not causing global warming.
Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -
Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism
I'm not a climate scientists. I'm a skeptic. And I can see that our country is using climate change to take away freedoms and to sell green energy.Myth?A correction which blows the global warming myth to hellSo a scientist -- discovers this?
So the scientific community has NOT been lying if this news is taken to be credible. It only means science was incorrect and gets corrected as time goes on? Wow!
Science at work? What will the right wing denier nuts do now, embrace science and scientists? Nah, they'll talk about Al Gore and other shit
I bet you think the whole world believed the world was flat until Columbus -- probably learned that in grade school where you became a climate scientist
Just because it's science does not ever mean it's truth.evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
CO2 is not causing global warming.
Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -
Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism
I'm qualified to know that there are many scientist that do not follow the global warming myth and they are ignored. Why be so afraid of differing opinions on climate change? Why not listen to all sides to find the truth?Wow ! Misty is qualified to be an anti-climate science expertCO2 feeds plants. I learned that in 4th grade.Yawn, but then there is this.....
http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/missing-carbon/
Temperatures have not gotten warmer is 17 years. That's proof that the climate is not getting warmer. It's staying the same.He's predicting temperatures to start cooling down in 2017 and we'll have a mini-ice age by 2030. If we see temperatures stagnate until 2017 as he says then others will be forced to sit up and listen. Otherwise, his credibility is out the window.
evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
CO2 is not causing global warming.
Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -
Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism
Just because it's science does not ever mean it's truth.evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
CO2 is not causing global warming.
Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -
Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism
Which only proves you're a conspiracist and a skeptic. Not very healthy mentally. When evidence is overwhelming and there is a consensus, a skeptic becomes at best a foolI'm not a climate scientists. I'm a skeptic. And I can see that our country is using climate change to take away freedoms and to sell green energy.Myth?A correction which blows the global warming myth to hellSo a scientist -- discovers this?
So the scientific community has NOT been lying if this news is taken to be credible. It only means science was incorrect and gets corrected as time goes on? Wow!
Science at work? What will the right wing denier nuts do now, embrace science and scientists? Nah, they'll talk about Al Gore and other shit
I bet you think the whole world believed the world was flat until Columbus -- probably learned that in grade school where you became a climate scientist
Many scientists who do not agree with the fact that the globe is warming? Many?I'm qualified to know that there are many scientist that do not follow the global warming myth and they are ignored. Why be so afraid of differing opinions on climate change? Why not listen to all sides to find the truth?Wow ! Misty is qualified to be an anti-climate science expertCO2 feeds plants. I learned that in 4th grade.Yawn, but then there is this.....
http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/missing-carbon/
Ok -- you've gone Rubber Room . Are you talking about local temperatures or the temperature of the planet?Temperatures have not gotten warmer is 17 years. That's proof that the climate is not getting warmer. It's staying the same.
When people are talking about climate science and you riff off into ideology ...evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
CO2 is not causing global warming.
Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -
Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism
how is that, holmes?
try refuting NASA NASA: Climate Change and Global WarmingJust because it's science does not ever mean it's truth.evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
CO2 is not causing global warming.
Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -
Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism
I'm not sure what that means, but global warming conclusions are pseudo science
Which only proves you're a conspiracist and a skeptic. Not very healthy mentally. When evidence is overwhelming and there is a consensus, a skeptic becomes at best a foolI'm not a climate scientists. I'm a skeptic. And I can see that our country is using climate change to take away freedoms and to sell green energy.Myth?A correction which blows the global warming myth to hellSo a scientist -- discovers this?
So the scientific community has NOT been lying if this news is taken to be credible. It only means science was incorrect and gets corrected as time goes on? Wow!
Science at work? What will the right wing denier nuts do now, embrace science and scientists? Nah, they'll talk about Al Gore and other shit
I bet you think the whole world believed the world was flat until Columbus -- probably learned that in grade school where you became a climate scientist
I have attached a graph of average annual temperature for the Southeast that compares the new Climate Division (black line) data with the older version (grey line). What we see is that the early part of the record has been adjusted downward (cooler) by over half a degree F! The adjustments are greatest from the 1930's through the 1950's, during what were known to be very hot decades in the Southeast and other regions.
try refuting NASA NASA: Climate Change and Global WarmingJust because it's science does not ever mean it's truth.evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
CO2 is not causing global warming.
Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -
Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism
I'm not sure what that means, but global warming conclusions are pseudo science
When people are talking about climate science and you riff off into ideology ...evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
CO2 is not causing global warming.
Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -
Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism
how is that, holmes?
please, go shit in a hat and call it ice-cream