Scientist discovers errors in global warming model

[my2¢]

He's predicting temperatures to start cooling down in 2017 and we'll have a mini-ice age by 2030. If we see temperatures stagnate until 2017 as he says then others will be forced to sit up and listen. Otherwise, his credibility is out the window.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Of course you'll. try to discredit him.

Any scientist that tried to prove global warming is a lie gets ignored or squelched.

The emperor has no clothes but you like looking at him naked.

Global warming is a lie. A calculated lie.

Why and how would Dante be able to discredit a scientist and his supposed findings?

Weirdo people who get caught up in conspiracies theories usually assume they and others have much more power than they really do.

It is the scientific community that discredits this one lone kook. Dante is only sharing widely available information. It is you Misty that is admiring the Emperor Dr Evans with his supposed new clothes

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

He has 6 math degrees.

How many weather science and climate science degrees does he have?

You remind me of people who think because Ben Carson operated on the brains of babies he's a qualified expert on anything he opens his mouth about

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Yawn, but then there is this.....

http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/missing-carbon/

CO2 feeds plants. I learned that in 4th grade.

Wow ! Misty is qualified to be an anti-climate science expert

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

So a scientist -- discovers this?

So the scientific community has NOT been lying if this news is taken to be credible. It only means science was incorrect and gets corrected as time goes on? Wow!

Science at work? What will the right wing denier nuts do now, embrace science and scientists? Nah, they'll talk about Al Gore and other shit

A correction which blows the global warming myth to hell

Myth?

I bet you think the whole world believed the world was flat until Columbus -- probably learned that in grade school where you became a climate scientist

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

CO2 is not causing global warming.



Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -

Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism

evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth

 

[Misty]

So a scientist -- discovers this?

So the scientific community has NOT been lying if this news is taken to be credible. It only means science was incorrect and gets corrected as time goes on? Wow!

Science at work? What will the right wing denier nuts do now, embrace science and scientists? Nah, they'll talk about Al Gore and other shit

A correction which blows the global warming myth to hell

Myth?

I bet you think the whole world believed the world was flat until Columbus -- probably learned that in grade school where you became a climate scientist

I'm not a climate scientists. I'm a skeptic. And I can see that our country is using climate change to take away freedoms and to sell green energy.

 

[Misty]

"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

CO2 is not causing global warming.



Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -

Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism

evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth

Just because it's science does not ever mean it's truth.

 

[Misty]

Yawn, but then there is this.....

http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/missing-carbon/

CO2 feeds plants. I learned that in 4th grade.

Wow ! Misty is qualified to be an anti-climate science expert

I'm qualified to know that there are many scientist that do not follow the global warming myth and they are ignored. Why be so afraid of differing opinions on climate change? Why not listen to all sides to find the truth?

 

[Misty]

He's predicting temperatures to start cooling down in 2017 and we'll have a mini-ice age by 2030. If we see temperatures stagnate until 2017 as he says then others will be forced to sit up and listen. Otherwise, his credibility is out the window.

Temperatures have not gotten warmer is 17 years. That's proof that the climate is not getting warmer. It's staying the same.

 

[kaz]

"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

CO2 is not causing global warming.



Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -

Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism

evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth

how is that, holmes?

 

[kaz]

"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

CO2 is not causing global warming.



Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -

Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism

evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth

Just because it's science does not ever mean it's truth.

I'm not sure what that means, but global warming conclusions are pseudo science

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

So a scientist -- discovers this?

So the scientific community has NOT been lying if this news is taken to be credible. It only means science was incorrect and gets corrected as time goes on? Wow!

Science at work? What will the right wing denier nuts do now, embrace science and scientists? Nah, they'll talk about Al Gore and other shit

A correction which blows the global warming myth to hell

Myth?

I bet you think the whole world believed the world was flat until Columbus -- probably learned that in grade school where you became a climate scientist

I'm not a climate scientists. I'm a skeptic. And I can see that our country is using climate change to take away freedoms and to sell green energy.

Which only proves you're a conspiracist and a skeptic. Not very healthy mentally. When evidence is overwhelming and there is a consensus, a skeptic becomes at best a fool

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Yawn, but then there is this.....

http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/missing-carbon/

CO2 feeds plants. I learned that in 4th grade.

Wow ! Misty is qualified to be an anti-climate science expert

I'm qualified to know that there are many scientist that do not follow the global warming myth and they are ignored. Why be so afraid of differing opinions on climate change? Why not listen to all sides to find the truth?

Many scientists who do not agree with the fact that the globe is warming? Many?

There are some very few who differ on the reasons for the warming, but the evidence is overwhelming. Now, climate science is a specialty field -- how many climate scientists do you follow?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Temperatures have not gotten warmer is 17 years. That's proof that the climate is not getting warmer. It's staying the same.

Ok -- you've gone Rubber Room . Are you talking about local temperatures or the temperature of the planet?

I believe you disagree with NASA. That makes you a bit nutty. Try and refute one fact on NASA's web site NASA: Climate Change and Global Warming

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

CO2 is not causing global warming.



Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -

Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism

evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth

how is that, holmes?

When people are talking about climate science and you riff off into ideology ...

please, go shit in a hat and call it ice-cream

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

CO2 is not causing global warming.



Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -

Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism

evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth

Just because it's science does not ever mean it's truth.

I'm not sure what that means, but global warming conclusions are pseudo science

try refuting NASA NASA: Climate Change and Global Warming

 

[gtopa1]

So a scientist -- discovers this?

So the scientific community has NOT been lying if this news is taken to be credible. It only means science was incorrect and gets corrected as time goes on? Wow!

Science at work? What will the right wing denier nuts do now, embrace science and scientists? Nah, they'll talk about Al Gore and other shit

A correction which blows the global warming myth to hell

Myth?

I bet you think the whole world believed the world was flat until Columbus -- probably learned that in grade school where you became a climate scientist

I'm not a climate scientists. I'm a skeptic. And I can see that our country is using climate change to take away freedoms and to sell green energy.

Which only proves you're a conspiracist and a skeptic. Not very healthy mentally. When evidence is overwhelming and there is a consensus, a skeptic becomes at best a fool

Nonsense. You "end of worlders" are a bloody cult. Even bloody burping cows are destroying Gaia!! The earth may well be warming a little since the 1700s.......but even that is being exaggerated with corrections to data. YOU KNOW THIS IS HAPPENING!!

I have attached a graph of average annual temperature for the Southeast that compares the new Climate Division (black line) data with the older version (grey line). What we see is that the early part of the record has been adjusted downward (cooler) by over half a degree F! The adjustments are greatest from the 1930's through the 1950's, during what were known to be very hot decades in the Southeast and other regions.

Does NOAA "adjust" Historical Climate Data? - Florida Climate Center

Therefore you are a liar and a fraud!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

CO2 is not causing global warming.



Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -

Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism

evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth

Just because it's science does not ever mean it's truth.

I'm not sure what that means, but global warming conclusions are pseudo science

try refuting NASA NASA: Climate Change and Global Warming

Hansen has been an alarmist for years!! He has been busy adjusting data to fit his theory......the epitome of fraud!!



Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA

Frankly it looks like crap to me!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

"A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

CO2 is not causing global warming.



Read more: Australian scientist discovers ERRORS in Global Warming models that COMPLETELY undermine climate theory!!! » The Right Scoop -

Sorry, this is a non-starter. You violated the inherent truth of liberalism

evidence your objection to the climate science is one of ideology and not science and truth

how is that, holmes?

When people are talking about climate science and you riff off into ideology ...

please, go shit in a hat and call it ice-cream

Seems you have coprophilic tendencies!!

Greg