Satellite Data Shows No Global Warming For Nearly 19 Years.

[CrusaderFrank]

Sure it's a fraction of a degree, but it's CO2, the most powerful GHG EVAH!!!!! Look at what it did to Venus! You can melt lead on the surface of Venus...because CO2!!!!

Want to know why there are absolutely no repeatable lab experiments linking a fraction of a degree change in CO2 with temperature ... well, it's because VENUS!!!! We're afraid that if we experiment too much with CO2, the most powerful GHG EVAH!!!!! that we'll soon be able to melt lead on Earth......or something

And the CrazyFruitcake adds a meaningless dash of denier cult insanity and nonsense.....as usual.

I won't stop trying to educate you and get you to see the error of your cult behavior

I won't stop pointing out what an ignorant and very delusional denier cult nutjob you are, CrazyFruitcake, with nothing to support your denial of the scientific facts confirming the reality and dangers of human caused global warming and its consequent climate changes but your raging insanity and some moldy old bogus myths and demented lies that you were handed by your puppetmasters in the fossil fuel industry.

You have literally no scientific facts, you have HarI Krishna like devotion to "consensus", which is a cult word.

One day you too will realize that

 

[SSDD]

You have literally no scientific facts, you have HarI Krishna like devotion to "consensus", which is a cult word.

One day you too will realize that

Highly doubtful....thunder seems to be the sort who, when he finds something to believe in sticks with it to the end..and when it becomes evident that he put his faith in a loser, breaks down entirely.

 

[Olde Europe]

What are the "dangers" of man made global warming? Care to list them?

Let's just note:

1. You have no clue.

2. You have not the faintest idea where to look for that information.

3. You are not marginally interested in the question, and thus disinclined to put in the work to find the answer on your own.

4. Disinclined to put in any work, you sustain yourself by expecting others to put in the work and to spoon-feed you.

5. Anyone who would answer your question would just further your spoiled-brat laziness, which is not at all conducive towards debate.

But...

Winner x 1
CrusaderFrank​

... you got yourself a like-minded and adoring fan.

For everybody else, here's AR5, WGII: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, with all the information one could hope for, provided one is endowed with the intellectual curiosity and the ability and willingness to read.

 

[Chuz Life]

What are the "dangers" of man made global warming? Care to list them?

Let's just note:

1. You have no clue.

2. You have not the faintest idea where to look for that information.

3. You are not marginally interested in the question, and thus disinclined to put in the work to find the answer on your own.

4. Disinclined to put in any work, you sustain yourself by expecting others to put in the work and to spoon-feed you.

5. Anyone who would answer your question would just further your spoiled-brat laziness, which is not at all conducive towards debate.

But...

Winner x 1
CrusaderFrank​

... you got yourself a like-minded and adoring fan.

For everybody else, here's AR5, WGII: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, with all the information one could hope for, provided one is endowed with the intellectual curiosity and the ability and willingness to read.

Note whatever you like...

I am waiting to see the list.

 

[skookerasbil]

There is definitely warming.........IF.......you accept the data that has been altered by the "climate science" club. Satellite data that has not been rigged is very clear: no warming since 1998. Exceedingly well documented within these pages for those who care to do a little research of their own.

 

[mamooth]

RSS / MSU and AMSU Data / Time Series Trend Browser

If you're a sexually frustrated old hag, or maybe some sort of hag-wannabee crossdresser, you'll scream that those satellite measurements don't show warming, being that lying for your cult is the only thing that sends a religious/sexual tingle up your leg these days.

All the normal people, however, look at the data and very clearly see the warming. This isn't a debate. Anyone claiming the satellites don't show warming is lying.

 

[skookerasbil]

RSS / MSU and AMSU Data / Time Series Trend Browser

If you're a sexually frustrated old hag, or maybe some sort of hag-wannabee crossdresser, you'll scream that those satellite measurements don't show warming, being that lying for your cult is the only thing that sends a religious/sexual tingle up your leg these days.

All the normal people, however, look at the data and very clearly see the warming. This isn't a debate. Anyone claiming the satellites don't show warming is lying.

lol.......s0n.......why do you think they label you guys (?) as "alarmists"? Even using your cherry picking, nobody is impressed with a rise in 0.3*.


Oh......and if the "normal people" reference had ANY substance, the EPA wouldn't be getting it nuts ripped off these days!!

 

[SSDD]

What are the "dangers" of man made global warming? Care to list them?

Let's just note:

1. You have no clue.

2. You have not the faintest idea where to look for that information.

3. You are not marginally interested in the question, and thus disinclined to put in the work to find the answer on your own.

4. Disinclined to put in any work, you sustain yourself by expecting others to put in the work and to spoon-feed you.

5. Anyone who would answer your question would just further your spoiled-brat laziness, which is not at all conducive towards debate.

But...

Winner x 1
CrusaderFrank​

... you got yourself a like-minded and adoring fan.

For everybody else, here's AR5, WGII: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, with all the information one could hope for, provided one is endowed with the intellectual curiosity and the ability and willingness to read.

Sounds like you know what the ideal temperature is for life on planet earth...tell us...what is it?

 

[Crick]

Sounds like you know what the ideal temperature is for life on planet earth.

On what do you base that?

After just watching poster Chuz Life get chewed for being lazy, what makes you think you'd get a response to equally lazy, rhetorical bullshit like that?

 

[Billy_Bob]

trend is to cooling now... with solar predictions now near baseline cooling and increasing clouds will be the rule of the day. New solar predictions by Dr Archibald are out and the next cycle is going to be 1/3 weaker than the SC24..

 

[Crick]

Do you expect that prediction to be as accurate as you've been with the ENSO index? If it's a valid prediction based on climate numbers, you (or Dr Archibald) wouldn't be the only folks making such a prediction. Yet it doesn't seem to be coming from anyone else. So... either you and Archibald know things that none of the several thousand other people (the ones with real educations) making such predictions or the two of you are simply wrong.

Guess which one I'm going with?

 

[Markle]

Meanwhile back in reality, NASA reports that this past February was the 2nd warmest on record

Agreement between the satellite and surface temperature data was good until about the year 2000, but since then NASA has been continuously tampering with their data to create the impression of non-existent warming. Just during the month after the election NASA altered their data even further.

Read more:
No Global Warming For 25 Years | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

 

[RollingThunder]

Meanwhile back in reality, NASA reports that this past February was the 2nd warmest on record

Agreement between the satellite and surface temperature data was good until about the year 2000, but since then NASA has been continuously tampering with their data to create the impression of non-existent warming. Just during the month after the election NASA altered their data even further.

Read more:
No Global Warming For 25 Years | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

And another crackpot conspiracy theory wacko pops up with more deranged drivel and bogus pseudo-science from yet another demented denier cult blog. All of which is based on the laughably insane notion that tens of thousands of scientists working in all the many fields associated with climate studies, in dozens of countries all around the world, ARE ALL IN A GIANT CONSPIRACY, for unknown reasons, to all get the same kind of data in their research as all the others and reach the same logical conclusions.

You seem too stupid to grasp how ridiculous your idiotic distrust and denial of science really is, Murky.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What are the "dangers" of man made global warming? Care to list them?

Let's just note:

1. You have no clue.

2. You have not the faintest idea where to look for that information.

3. You are not marginally interested in the question, and thus disinclined to put in the work to find the answer on your own.

4. Disinclined to put in any work, you sustain yourself by expecting others to put in the work and to spoon-feed you.

5. Anyone who would answer your question would just further your spoiled-brat laziness, which is not at all conducive towards debate.

But...

Winner x 1
CrusaderFrank​

... you got yourself a like-minded and adoring fan.

For everybody else, here's AR5, WGII: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, with all the information one could hope for, provided one is endowed with the intellectual curiosity and the ability and willingness to read.

AR5 is the punchline to the quasi-science, anti-science "climetology" joke. Confronted by a 2 decade pause in temperatures, AR5 fudged the results by inventing a whole new, never before accounted data set: the "excess heat" trapped like a rat in the deep oceans. It's the Bernie Madoff approach to presenting results: you can keep a fraudulent operation in business as long as your backers are willing to accept your doctored results

 

[Whocares386]

Before global warming or another natural disaster, we may be destroy humanity because of irregular population. We're expecting 9.5 billion people in 2050!.. I think it is shame for us because we can't control that.

There is an article explains us its implications:

Population Increase and Its Implications

 

[RollingThunder]

And another crackpot conspiracy theory wacko pops up with more deranged drivel and bogus pseudo-science from yet another demented denier cult blog. All of which is based on the laughably insane notion that tens of thousands of scientists working in all the many fields associated with climate studies, in dozens of countries all around the world, ARE ALL IN A GIANT CONSPIRACY, for unknown reasons, to all get the same kind of data in their research as all the others and reach the same logical conclusions.

You seem too stupid to grasp how ridiculous your idiotic distrust and denial of science really is, Murky.

AR5 is the punchline to the quasi-science, anti-science "climetology" joke. Confronted by a 2 decade pause in temperatures, AR5 fudged the results by inventing a whole new, never before accounted data set: the "excess heat" trapped like a rat in the deep oceans. It's the Bernie Madoff approach to presenting results: you can keep a fraudulent operation in business as long as your backers are willing to accept your doctored results

LOLOLOLOLOL......hey thanks, CrazyFruitcake, for demonstrating my point so quickly, and for once again showing how utterly insane you conspiracy theories are.

 

[SSDD]

LOLOLOLOLOL......hey thanks, CrazyFruitcake, for demonstrating my point so quickly, and for once again showing how utterly insane you conspiracy theories are.

Ever wonder why you universally jump straight to calling people who disagree with you insane thunder?...perhaps trying to convince yourself that you aren't slipping off the deep end perhaps? When people get stuck in a rut and repeat the same response no matter who they are talking to, and no matter what the topic...they are revealing something quite deep and disturbing about themselves.

Just so you know...

 

[frigidweirdo]

Scientists with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a study Thursday claiming there’s no hiatus in global warming. But new satellite-derived temperature measurements show there’s been no global warming for 18 years and six months.

Read more: Satellite Data Shows No Global Warming For Nearly 19 Years

Yeah, er... Lord Christopher Monckton, the third viscount Monckton of Brenchley is, according to your article, a "climate expert".

Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley - Wikipedia

"a British public speaker[1] and hereditary peer. He is known for his work as a journalist, Conservative political advisor, UKIP political candidate, and for his invention of the mathematical puzzle Eternity"

Hmm, not much about him being a climate expert.

"In recent years his public speaking has garnered attention due to his advocacy of climate change denial"

Basically this is fake news.

 

[miketx]

Where are the cave drawings that show past climate? Ever wonder why we have the same liberals supporting this lie time and time again?

 

[Old Rocks]

In the Sahara, you dumb fuck.