Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Just because I don't fall for the chicken little routine every time you morons hear Trump say something doesn't make me a hack.
You stated that you call people that call Repub women names assholes, but it is ok for people to call Dem women names...that is what makes you a hack.
On the other hand your sides pavlovian response to anything he does of "IMPEACH TREASON DRUMF FUH FUH FUH GAARRRGGGLLLE NARRGGLE SNARF" is what hackery is all about.
My side? This is my side....Libertarian Party This was who I voted for in the last two elections...Gary Johnson - Wikipedia
So, feel free to provide some links to my side calling for impeachment of Trump.
As for my views on impeachment...North Korea fires another missile, government shutdown looming...
No, Progressives claim that things like this are "hurtful" then throw it out the window when a woman has conservative/libertarian viewpoints. It's hypocrisy pure and simple
You bash Trump along with the progs, you are nothing more than a useful dupe.
I love the SCOTUS and I love my tax cut. I'm happy about that dumbfuck.I think she does a pretty good job. Too bad she works for a dumbfuck.
did he make the same claims about women's rights that the left has made? hmmmmm that's one you'll have to prove. without that, then he is no hypocrite. And you then are a liar again.No, Progressives claim that things like this are "hurtful" then throw it out the window when a woman has conservative/libertarian viewpoints. It's hypocrisy pure and simple
Yes, yes it is. But it is no different than your hypocrisy, so why are you whining about it?
You bash Trump along with the progs, you are nothing more than a useful dupe.
I do bash Trump, because as a Libertarian I do not agree with much of what he is doing.
Watched a report this morning about Trumps position on if Russia is still trying to influence our elections and she had to yet again, clarify his position.I think she does a pretty good job. Too bad she works for a dumbfuck.
question asked and answered. it seems your issue is with the person that redundantly asks the same question over and over. She is merely obliging them. I wish she'd tell them to eat shit and die. but she has far more class than I at that point.Watched a report this morning about Trumps position on if Russia is still trying to influence our elections and she had to yet again, clarify his position.I think she does a pretty good job. Too bad she works for a dumbfuck.
I think she does a pretty good job. Too bad she works for a dumbfuck.
remember the good old days of obammy's terms where the Press Secretary got lobbed grapefruits? You know pointless question that had nothing to do with our country and its security and obammy's position? remember those days of hypocrisy?Watched a report this morning about Trumps position on if Russia is still trying to influence our elections and she had to yet again, clarify his position.I think she does a pretty good job. Too bad she works for a dumbfuck.
What insults to her looks? Other thanAdd to that all the insults about her looks.Trump says so much stupid shit, she is constantly under fire and left to clean up his mess.
Why she remains there is a mystery.
.
no it isn't, retards in a sandbox make more sense.I think she does a pretty good job. Too bad she works for a dumbfuck.
I have no love for the Huckaboo clan, but one has to admit she gets hit with a flame thrower quit a bit for her boss for no other reason then Trumps her boss. Most of the questions the retarded press corps ask just need to be ignored they are so fucking dumb. It’s like watching retards argue in a sandbox.
stalking eh? Dream girl is she?What insults to her looks? Other thanAdd to that all the insults about her looks.Trump says so much stupid shit, she is constantly under fire and left to clean up his mess.
Why she remains there is a mystery.
.my siglinephotos of her.
Change, not clarify. His answer was crystal clear.Watched a report this morning about Trumps position on if Russia is still trying to influence our elections and she had to yet again, clarify his position.I think she does a pretty good job. Too bad she works for a dumbfuck.
Grow up. How many unflattering comments and photos of Hillary have you seen from the right wing fever swamps. Or USMB.That's a good point, hateful internet cowards are the issue.Add to that all the insults about her looks.Trump says so much stupid shit, she is constantly under fire and left to clean up his mess.
Why she remains there is a mystery.
.
Who insults her about her looks? Nobody that isn't hiding behind an internet username.
.
Quote Michelle Wolf’s insult to huckabilly’s looks. I dare you.Who insults her about her looks? Nobody that isn't hiding behind an internet username.
Have you already forgotten Michelle Wolf?
That doesn’t attack her looks either.Its appearance.That's not attacking her for her looks. That you think she's being attacked for her looks tells about you more than anything. Spicer was mocked for his ill fitting suits. They weren't attacking his looks, but his fashion choice.
Do i need to post definitions and synonyms?
Just shut up, good lord.
Appearance and looks are not the same thing. Mocking her fashion choices is not attacking her looks by any stretch of the imagination. She's not "attacked" for her looks outside of a comment section. That you think commentary about her clothing is commenting on her attractiveness tell us how you feel about her looks and nothing more.
OK. She's a lying bitch. That didn't insult her looks, did it?
She hasn't been "attacked" for her looks. RWers, who obviously don't find her attractive, perceive anything said about her to be about her looks...but that's on THEM. Wolf never said anything about her attractiveness or lack thereof. They perceived an attack on her looks because they see her as unattractive.
Watch Chelsea Handler Call Sarah Huckabee Sanders A 'Whore'
“That harlot that they’re dressing up and trolloping out every day?” Handler said. “I mean, one day she has no makeup on at all, the next she has six-foot-long eyelashes, she’s got cleavage and summer whore lipstick all over her face. Can you believe what they turned her into? A proper trollop.”
Amazing, from a party that has gone after Hillary’s looks for 25 years.Its appearance.
Do i need to post definitions and synonyms?
Just shut up, good lord.
Appearance and looks are not the same thing. Mocking her fashion choices is not attacking her looks by any stretch of the imagination. She's not "attacked" for her looks outside of a comment section. That you think commentary about her clothing is commenting on her attractiveness tell us how you feel about her looks and nothing more.
Dodge, duck, dip, dive......and dodge.
Where is the dodge? When the RW went after Obama about his tan suit, did you perceive those attacks to be about his looks or the suit?
Keep trying to justify gutless personal attacks on her looks.
Anything for the cause, eh comrade?
No, Progressives claim that things like this are "hurtful" then throw it out the window when a woman has conservative/libertarian viewpoints. It's hypocrisy pure and simple
Yes, yes it is. But it is no different than your hypocrisy, so why are you whining about it?
You bash Trump along with the progs, you are nothing more than a useful dupe.
I do bash Trump, because as a Libertarian I do not agree with much of what he is doing.
That doesn’t attack her looks either.Its appearance.
Do i need to post definitions and synonyms?
Just shut up, good lord.
Appearance and looks are not the same thing. Mocking her fashion choices is not attacking her looks by any stretch of the imagination. She's not "attacked" for her looks outside of a comment section. That you think commentary about her clothing is commenting on her attractiveness tell us how you feel about her looks and nothing more.
OK. She's a lying bitch. That didn't insult her looks, did it?
She hasn't been "attacked" for her looks. RWers, who obviously don't find her attractive, perceive anything said about her to be about her looks...but that's on THEM. Wolf never said anything about her attractiveness or lack thereof. They perceived an attack on her looks because they see her as unattractive.
Watch Chelsea Handler Call Sarah Huckabee Sanders A 'Whore'
“That harlot that they’re dressing up and trolloping out every day?” Handler said. “I mean, one day she has no makeup on at all, the next she has six-foot-long eyelashes, she’s got cleavage and summer whore lipstick all over her face. Can you believe what they turned her into? A proper trollop.”
You suck at this.
Amazing, from a party that has gone after Hillary’s looks for 25 years.Appearance and looks are not the same thing. Mocking her fashion choices is not attacking her looks by any stretch of the imagination. She's not "attacked" for her looks outside of a comment section. That you think commentary about her clothing is commenting on her attractiveness tell us how you feel about her looks and nothing more.
Dodge, duck, dip, dive......and dodge.
Where is the dodge? When the RW went after Obama about his tan suit, did you perceive those attacks to be about his looks or the suit?
Keep trying to justify gutless personal attacks on her looks.
Anything for the cause, eh comrade?
