Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The African comment had been refuted, and there is no proof that she said it, Dogbert.
She is not my messiah, and I wouldn't vote for her, unless I had to.
I thought I did hear that some banks were forced to take the money...am I wrong? Having said that, the governments place is not in the private sector...period. They shouldn't have intervened, the companies that were hurting are still hurting for the most part, because they didn't learn anything. When a company has to belly up in court, they come out of BK usually stronger than when they went into it. If they fail, another company comes in and replaces it, and are usually stronger. But the government should not be involved in the manner that it is.
The African comment had been refuted, and there is no proof that she said it, Dogbert.
She is not my messiah, and I wouldn't vote for her, unless I had to.
I thought I did hear that some banks were forced to take the money...am I wrong? Having said that, the governments place is not in the private sector...period. They shouldn't have intervened, the companies that were hurting are still hurting for the most part, because they didn't learn anything. When a company has to belly up in court, they come out of BK usually stronger than when they went into it. If they fail, another company comes in and replaces it, and are usually stronger. But the government should not be involved in the manner that it is.
Except for the ones that, you know, don't come out at all.
And no, no banks were forced to take $$$. They made a choice to do so.
And with that final piece of "logic" of yours, within twenty years, the auto and banking industry would be entirely owned by foreign companies.
The African comment had been refuted, and there is no proof that she said it, Dogbert.
She is not my messiah, and I wouldn't vote for her, unless I had to.
I thought I did hear that some banks were forced to take the money...am I wrong? Having said that, the governments place is not in the private sector...period. They shouldn't have intervened, the companies that were hurting are still hurting for the most part, because they didn't learn anything. When a company has to belly up in court, they come out of BK usually stronger than when they went into it. If they fail, another company comes in and replaces it, and are usually stronger. But the government should not be involved in the manner that it is.
Except for the ones that, you know, don't come out at all.
And no, no banks were forced to take $$$. They made a choice to do so.
And with that final piece of "logic" of yours, within twenty years, the auto and banking industry would be entirely owned by foreign companies.
I remember Paulson forcing them to do so. independently of the savage nation.
I remember Paulson forcing them to do so. independently of the savage nation.
Link? And you're not using savage as a source are you?
so which is worse? saying there are 57 states in the US? (100 percent sure happened) or thinking Africa is a continent? (50 percent sure happened)
No. but I think he's hilarious.
"Female students who come from a Marin County private school to feed and provide services to the homeless "can go in and get raped by them because they seem to like the excitement of it.."
"They say, "Oh, there's a billion of them." I said, "So, kill 100 million of them, then there'll be 900 million of them." I mean, would you rather die — would you rather us die than them?"
so which is worse? saying there are 57 states in the US? (100 percent sure happened) or thinking Africa is a continent? (50 percent sure happened)
Making a slipup or actually believing something? I'd go with actually believing something.
No. but I think he's hilarious.
The same guy who said:
"Female students who come from a Marin County private school to feed and provide services to the homeless "can go in and get raped by them because they seem to like the excitement of it.."
And:
"They say, "Oh, there's a billion of them." I said, "So, kill 100 million of them, then there'll be 900 million of them." I mean, would you rather die would you rather us die than them?"
so obama believes we deserved 9/11, the govt started aids to kill the blacks, and america should be damned because california has a 3 strike law. all worse than believing Africa is a country?
so obama believes we deserved 9/11, the govt started aids to kill the blacks, and america should be damned because california has a 3 strike law. all worse than believing Africa is a country?
Now that is going too far. I don't think Obama believes that. That's like saying anyone who goes to Church believes Homosexuals are deviant creatures or something like that.
not sure what the second quote is in reference to.
I would like to hear the segment of the first one to know who he is talking about and why he said it.
the guy is funny because the things he says are so outrageous.
I would do a much better job than your Messiah. Sarah Palin is to Conservatism as Dr. Pepper is to Medicine. The Africa comment has not been refuted and considering her behavior it's not out of possibility.
As for the Government having voting rights to GM and other lending institutions, nobody forced these companies to do so or take these loans. Or did I miss that memo?
The African comment had been refuted, and there is no proof that she said it, Dogbert.
She is not my messiah, and I wouldn't vote for her, unless I had to.
I thought I did hear that some banks were forced to take the money...am I wrong? Having said that, the governments place is not in the private sector...period. They shouldn't have intervened, the companies that were hurting are still hurting for the most part, because they didn't learn anything. When a company has to belly up in court, they come out of BK usually stronger than when they went into it. If they fail, another company comes in and replaces it, and are usually stronger. But the government should not be involved in the manner that it is.
according to Savidge, they were forced to take the money by Hank Paulson.
So if this did occur, it occurred under Bush. Yet you're blaming Obama.
the answering to Obama happened under obama. the banks being forced to take the money happened under bush.
the answering to Obama happened under obama. the banks being forced to take the money happened under bush.
Yes, but it's not like Obama set it up for that to occur.
