San Francisco mayor bans publicly-funded travel to Indiana in response to "religious freedom" law

I'm sure people are sick and tired of the homosexual's constant frikken whining, threats and bullying the rest of us

If they think that helps people to accept them. THINK AGAIN
 
Best way to fight the faggots is to emphasize that nearly all of them are child molesters. The priest scandal proved that.
 
Did anyone ever hear of someone not from Indiana say: I am going to take the family to Indiana for vacation? Almost like someone going to Oklahoma for vacation :eek:
Gay issues aside. I still wouldn't want to visit Indiana, as there is very little to do there, beyond car racing, getting high on Monsanto fumes, or fracking stuff.
 
Did anyone ever hear of someone not from Indiana say: I am going to take the family to Indiana for vacation? Almost like someone going to Oklahoma for vacation :eek:
Gay issues aside. I still wouldn't want to visit Indiana, as there is very little to do there, beyond car racing, getting high on Monsanto fumes, or fracking stuff.

well, that is true. that is called: laid back. lol
 
Best way to fight the faggots is to emphasize that nearly all of them are child molesters. The priest scandal proved that.
Even if the statistics and facts on the ground totally disagree with that?

Molesting kids is not gender, race or sexual orientation specific. Straight or Gay, doesn't matter statistically - as both do it enough, and no one is genetically disposed to molest kids.

Guess you have never heard that story about the father that had incest with his daughter, and raped her, then forced her to have children - while imprisoning her secretly in his home. Fritz or something was his name, and without a doubt he was straight.
 
Ban travel, to the faggot-hating state, good.
Which one?

There are sooooooo many to choose from.
tongue_smile.gif
 
Why should anyone try to use religion to deprive others of equal rights?
Depends on whether the Objects of the Exercise are sexual perverts engaged in un-clean and filthy and despicable sexual practices and related lifestyle manifestations.

Whatever it takes, to contain such perversion... if it can be hit from the Religious angle, then, all the better... every weapon in the arsenal is fair game.
 
Why should anyone try to use religion to deprive others of equal rights?
Depends on whether the Objects of the Exercise are sexual perverts engaged in un-clean and filthy and despicable sexual practices and related lifestyle manifestations.

Whatever it takes, to contain such perversion... if it can be hit from the Religious angle, then, all the better... every weapon in the arsenal is fair game.

That is not for you alone to decide. That is a collective decision.
 
Why should anyone try to use religion to deprive others of equal rights?
Depends on whether the Objects of the Exercise are sexual perverts engaged in un-clean and filthy and despicable sexual practices and related lifestyle manifestations.

Whatever it takes, to contain such perversion... if it can be hit from the Religious angle, then, all the better... every weapon in the arsenal is fair game.
Live in a 'faggot-loving' state, so have fun with joining the rest of America, when the Supreme Court finally rules against yours.
 
Why should anyone try to use religion to deprive others of equal rights?
Depends on whether the Objects of the Exercise are sexual perverts engaged in un-clean and filthy and despicable sexual practices and related lifestyle manifestations.

Whatever it takes, to contain such perversion... if it can be hit from the Religious angle, then, all the better... every weapon in the arsenal is fair game.

That is not for you alone to decide. That is a collective decision.
No, so far it's been a Judicial Activism decision.

Virtually each time that a Defense of Traditional Marriage sort of referendum has been on a ballot, it has passed, including States like The Land of Fruits and Nuts.

Courts have been overturning them.

It hasn't been The People.

It's been The Courts.

And, when the 'collective decision', as you, yourself, have labeled it, is overturned and frustrated time and again and again, The People start getting pissed.

Where there's a Will, there's a Way.

Especially when it involves The Will of the People.

The ULTIMATE in 'collective decisions'.

You guys are really great about making 'collective decisions' until you don't get your own way, during the course of the decision-making.

And then you resort to the law-courts, and find a way to overturn those 'collective decisions'.

Well... America has had enough... and, on January 20, 2017, we may see the beginnings of yet another paradigm shift.

I look forward to that possibility with great and enjoyable anticipation.
 
Last edited:
Why should anyone try to use religion to deprive others of equal rights?
Depends on whether the Objects of the Exercise are sexual perverts engaged in un-clean and filthy and despicable sexual practices and related lifestyle manifestations.

Whatever it takes, to contain such perversion... if it can be hit from the Religious angle, then, all the better... every weapon in the arsenal is fair game.
Live in a 'faggot-loving' state, so have fun with joining the rest of America, when the Supreme Court finally rules against yours.

"Faggot-loving state"? I'd just like for all of us to live in a "tolerant" state with equal rights for all. How's that?
 
Ban travel, to the faggot-hating state, good.

yeah, but the o/p is a gay bashing nutter. you expected him to be happy?
Hissy fits, in 'Frisco, are so commonplace as to go unnoticed.

stop projecting. the only hissy fit are the rightwingnut gay bashers.

but then again, they're always hating someone ... actually anyone who isn't white, christian and male.

:cuckoo:
 
Economic blackmail as with boycotts shouldn't be how we oppose these kinds of things. Outta use existing law to do that.

"Hey look! The First Amendment! We're already free to exercise our religion. We're just not free to be dicks to people we don't like."
 

Forum List

Back
Top