Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet the numbers are trending within the margin or for Romney.
"Comfy zone" as JoeB131 likes to put it for an incumbent.
Nationwide or battleground? We don't elect the president by popular vote, remember? It's all about the Electoral College.
Currently even the most favorable polls for Obama shows Romney leading in electorial votes. 204-201
Of course, I could be wrong, but I don't ever remember a candidate running on limiting the rights of Americans.
Of course, I could be wrong, but I don't ever remember a candidate running on limiting the rights of Americans.
Sure you do, like forcing people to buy a product they may not want or need, you just don't care when a member of your political party does it because you're a dishonest and dishonorable liar.
Yeah, Americans have been brainwashed for so long that they think a return to the original intents and purposes of the Constitution is anti-American. I keep saying, we force people to take classes, pass an exam and get a license to paint someone's toe nails or cut their hair, but we let alomst any moron that shows up cast a vote for the leader of the free world and then we wonder why we have leaders that have led this nation to the very brink or destruction.
Of course, I could be wrong, but I don't ever remember a candidate running on limiting the rights of Americans.
Adviser Reaffirms Romney Support For Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment | TPM LiveWire"Governor Romney supports a federal marriage amendment to the Constitution that defines marriage as an institution between a man and a woman," Buchanan told BuzzFeed. "Governor Romney also believes, consistent with the 10th Amendment, that it should be left to states to decide whether to grant same-sex couples certain benefits, such as hospital visitation rights and the ability to adopt children. I referred to the Tenth Amendment only when speaking about these kinds of benefits not marriage."
given the number of people who support romney's beliefs about marriage, you can hardly consider it anti american.
Multiple wives?
I have been mistaken for a very long time as it seems I have misunderstood the constitution. I thought it ensured our rights and limited powers of government. Guess I had it backwards.
given the number of people who support romney's beliefs about marriage, you can hardly consider it anti american.
given the number of people who support romney's beliefs about marriage, you can hardly consider it anti american.
Segregation is unamerican, too, yet if it were put to a vote in certain parts of the county, it would pass resoundingly. The purpose of the constitution and the courts is to protect us from mob rule p
given the number of people who support romney's beliefs about marriage, you can hardly consider it anti american.
Segregation is unamerican, too, yet if it were put to a vote in certain parts of the county, it would pass resoundingly. The purpose of the constitution and the courts is to protect us from mob rule p
given the number of people who support romney's beliefs about marriage, you can hardly consider it anti american.
Multiple wives?