Roberts Justice or Injustice

[bigrebnc1775]

Not sure if anyone has cover this but I would like to discuss the last part of Roberts reason for ruling for obamacare

“ It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.”

Read more: Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts did right in saving Obamacare - NY Daily News

OK Roberts if it's not your job and voting doesn't doesn't help the people who do we turn too? Guns?

 

[Lakhota]

What a guy!

 

[Lakhota]

Wrath of Cons: Chief Justice John Roberts bashed as ‘traitor’ after casting key vote to uphold health care law

The usual suspects go collectively insane | The Zingularity

The Persecution Of Chief Justice John Roberts Begins: Threats Of 2nd Amendment “Remedies”! | The Progressive Professor

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What a guy!

The same guy who said the courts are not there too protect you?
I bet you love Bush now?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Wrath of Cons: Chief Justice John Roberts bashed as ‘traitor’ after casting key vote to uphold health care law

The usual suspects go collectively insane | The Zingularity

The Persecution Of Chief Justice John Roberts Begins: Threats Of 2nd Amendment “Remedies”! | The Progressive Professor

Stop the god damn spam. If you can't discus the OP move the fuck on.

 

[Lakhota]

It ain't spam. It reflects the wrath of you lunacons.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How can Roberts justify what he said

“ It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.”

When the majority of Americans did not want obamacaretax?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It ain't spam. It reflects the wrath of you lunacons.

I don't give a fuck if conservatives call Roberts a traitor or what ever. I want to discuss how he can justify what he said.

 

[Lakhota]

It ain't spam. It reflects the wrath of you lunacons.

I don't give a fuck if conservatives call Roberts a traitor or what ever. I want to discuss how he can justify what he said.

Fair enough. I just hope no one starts calling this great man a socialist.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It ain't spam. It reflects the wrath of you lunacons.

I don't give a fuck if conservatives call Roberts a traitor or what ever. I want to discuss how he can justify what he said.

Fair enough. I just hope no one starts calling this great man a socialist.

The man just said the courts are not there too protect you. Do you even care what that might mean? Get off your obamacare stupor and pay attention.

 

[Lakhota]

I don't give a fuck if conservatives call Roberts a traitor or what ever. I want to discuss how he can justify what he said.

Fair enough. I just hope no one starts calling this great man a socialist.

The man just said the courts are not there too protect you. Do you even care what that might mean? Get off your obamacare stupor and pay attention.

Obama and Justice Roberts are just trying to do what the The Heritage Foundation recommended in 1989.

 

[old navy]

The comment from the Chief Justice is odd on its face but factual if one believes the Court made their decision based on the constitution.

Obama and crew advertised the individual mandate in the PPACA as constitutional under the commerce clause. When the Solicitor argued the case in court, it all of a sudden became a tax.

Back to the comment. Chief Justice Roberts has reminded the electorate that elections have consequences and if the People do not approve of the policy of the current administration, changes can be made in four months.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Fair enough. I just hope no one starts calling this great man a socialist.

The man just said the courts are not there too protect you. Do you even care what that might mean? Get off your obamacare stupor and pay attention.

Obama and Justice Roberts are just trying to do what the The Heritage Foundation recommended in 1989.

Not talking about 1989
I'm talking about what he said yesterday
June 28 2012

“ It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.”

Aren't you the least bit concerned that a Justice of the high court doesn't think it's the job of the court to protect the people?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The comment from the Chief Justice is odd on its face but factual if one believes the Court made their decision based on the constitution.

Obama and crew advertised the individual mandate in the PPACA as constitutional under the commerce clause. When the Solicitor argued the case in court, it all of a sudden became a tax.

Back to the comment. Chief Justice Roberts has reminded the electorate that elections have consequences and if the People do not approve of the policy of the current administration, changes can be made in four months.

I really don't want this discussion to go off track
But what do you do when it seems that voting does not make any change? There is only one recourse to turn too.

 

[Lakhota]

Personally, I thought Roberts DID protect the people with his final vote; however, he may have changed his mind along the way.

Was the Dissent Originally a Majority Opinion? | The Volokh Conspiracy

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Personally, I thought Roberts DID protect the people with his final vote; however, he may have changed his mind along the way.

Was the Dissent Originally a Majority Opinion? | The Volokh Conspiracy

How did he protect THE PEOPLE?

“ It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.”

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Isn't anyone concerned about Roberts comment?

 

[Lakhota]

Isn't anyone concerned about Roberts comment?

Nope, not me.

 

[Lakhota]

Matt Davis, Former GOP Spokesman, Suggests 'Armed Rebellion' After Supreme Court Ruling

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Isn't anyone concerned about Roberts comment?

Nope, not me.

I can see that so if the court over turned Roe vs Wade you wouldn't care?