Republicans Finally Admit They Have No Incriminating Evidence on Joe Biden

i8lo8n7hy10b1.png


millions of SARs generated every year.
very small proportion are an actual crime.

Holy shit. You weren't joking. Literally millions of SARs a year.


With about 4% resulting in follow up by Law Enforcement. ANd a tiny subset of that 4% resulting in any charges or convictions.
 

The IRS has removed the “entire investigative team” from its years-long probe into Hunter Biden in what has been described as retaliation against a whistleblower who alleged a coverup in the case, according to a report from the New York Post.


The move was allegedly ordered by the U.S. Department of Justice, according to a letter sent to Congress by the whistleblower’s attorneys. “Today the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Criminal Supervisory Special Agent we represent was informed that he and his entire investigative team are being removed from the ongoing and sensitive investigation of the high-profile, controversial subject about which our client sought to make whistleblower disclosures to Congress,” attorneys Tristan Leavitt and Mark Whyte wrote. “He was informed the change was at the request of the Department of Justice,” the letter continued.


In April, the whistleblower came forward and accused the Biden Administration of obstructing the investigation into the president’s son. The agent, who has overseen the Hunter Biden probe since 2020, has not publicly identified Hunter Biden as the subject of his claims, though Congressional sources have, according to the New York Post.


In a letter addressed to multiple US Senators, the agent’s attorneys revealed had already made legally protected disclosures internally at the IRS, through counsel to the U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, and to the Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General.


After the sacking of the investigative team, the whistleblower has claimed that the move is retaliation from the Biden Administration. “On April 27, 2023, IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel appeared before the House Committee on Ways and Means. He testified: ‘I can say without any hesitation there will be no retaliation for anyone making an allegation or a call to a whistleblower hotline.’ However, this move is clearly retaliatory and may also constitute obstruction of a congressional inquiry,” the agent’s lawyers continued in Monday’s letter.


“Our client has a right to make disclosures to Congress … He is protected by 5 U.S.C. § 2302 from retaliatory personnel actions—including receiving a ‘significant change in duties, responsibilities, or working conditions’ (which this clearly is) because of his disclosures to Congress,” the letter continued. “Any attempt by any government official to prevent a federal employee from furnishing information to Congress is also a direct violation of longstanding appropriations restriction. Furthermore, 18 U.S.C. § 1505 makes it a crime to obstruct an investigation of Congress.”


The removal of the team came just hours after special counsel John Durham released his long-awaited report on the origins of the infamous Trump-Russia probe. Durham concluded that the FBI should never have opened the investigation and found that they had no evidence of collusion between then-candidate Trump’s team and Russian intelligence agencies.
 
Well then. That changes things.

Republicans Finally Admit They Have No Incriminating Evidence on Joe Biden
A 65-page report, a press conference, and nothing to show for it

Republicans’ big investigation into the Biden family has revealed … not a lot.
The House GOP accused Joe Biden and his family on Wednesday of engaging in business with foreign entities—but were unable to provide any actual evidence linking the president to any wrongdoing.
House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer released a 65-page memo detailing a sprawling investigation into Biden and some of his relatives, particularly his son Hunter Biden. Nowhere in the massive document was there a specific allegation of a crime committed by Biden or any of his relatives.

So you think

Setting up 20 shell companies that produce nothing and give no service, using 12 seperate banks to move money from China, Russia, Romania, Ukraine, Burisma, and others - triggering Suspicious Bank Activity Reports because each transfer equals a count of money laundering, before depositing money into 11 different Biden family member accounts - to include Joe's grandkids - is perfectly legal and presents no criminal issue whatsoever?

:shok:

TrumpLaugh.jpg
 
So you think

Setting up 20 shell companies that produce nothing and give no service, using 12 seperate banks to move money from China, Russia, Romania, Ukraine, Burisma, and others - triggering Suspicious Bank Activity Reports because each transfer equals a count of money laundering, before depositing money into 11 different Biden family member accounts - to include Joe's grandkids - is perfectly legal and presents no criminal issue whatsoever?

:shok:

View attachment 785938

There's no evidence that Joe Biden set up even one of those 20 'shell companies'. Or received a single bank transfer.

So much for 'judgment day', eh, buddy?
 


So its okay if China, Russia, Romania, Burisma, Ukraine, and others pay the ENTIRE Biden family - even the grandkids - millions of dollars...

....AS LONG AS THERE IS NO RECORD / EVIDENCE OF VP / PRESIDRNT BIDEN TAKING ANY....


.....because paying the entireBidren family millions could in no way influence / compromise Joe Biden....?!

That is what you're saying?!

TrumpLaugh.jpg
 
So its okay if China, Russia, Romania, Burisma, Ukraine, and others pay the ENTIRE Biden family - even the grandkids - millions of dollars...

....AS LONG AS THERE IS NO RECORD / EVIDENCE OF VP / PRESIDRNT BIDEN TAKING ANY....


.....because paying the entireBidren family millions could in no way influence / compromise Joe Biden....?!

That is what you're saying?!

View attachment 785939

Laughing.....and where are the bank transfers to Joe Biden? Where are the SARs against Joe Biden? Where's the direct evidence of Joe Biden breaking any law?

These are such a simple questions and yet they sends you fleeing every time I ask it.
 
So you think

Setting up 20 shell companies that produce nothing and give no service, using 12 seperate banks to move money from China, Russia, Romania, Ukraine, Burisma, and others - triggering Suspicious Bank Activity Reports because each transfer equals a count of money laundering, before depositing money into 11 different Biden family member accounts - to include Joe's grandkids - is perfectly legal and presents no criminal issue whatsoever?

:shok:

View attachment 785938

Then why didn't the GOP do anything? If all that's true, then they would've found something to tag Biden with.
 
You go ahead and think that. The only reason Biden isn't being impeached is because of who the current VP is.
That current VP makes no fucking difference.
An impeachment would fail in the Senate so Harris would never even sniff the Presidency, and you know it.
Just another lame excuse, because in reality, you have NO EVIDENCE to impeach biden.
 
Sure it does. People with common sense don't want Kamel-Toe to be president.
No Shit Sherlock.
I can't stand her either.

The point was....... Harris being VP has nothing to do with lack of impeachment for biden, as you claim.

The reason biden isn't being impeached is .........
Lack of a crime.

The only reason Biden isn't being impeached is because of who the current VP is.
 
Lennhy, you are looking silly again. Do you really think the Repubs have enough evidence to impeach Biden, get it through the Senate and throw him out of office? And you think the only reason the Repubs dont is the VP?
Impeaching riquires ZERO evidence. Remember? You guys did it to Trump TWICE without any evidence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top