Republican Admits To Paying Male Prostitute But Says “I’m Not Gay”, LMAO!

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.


Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

And in every single time, they have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Now, I sure hope you are not insinuating that strait couples and straight people have never done such aggregious things. Evil people are evil...regardless of their sexuality.
 
I'm still pretty sure this doesn't actually answer someone getting a free pass from rape and murder as you said here. Oh and here too, where you say the only way a liberal would object is if it happened in church.


The press did give the two murderous homosexual perverts a free pass. None of the major news outlets even mentioned the case. Neither did any of the television news programs.

Also, can you quote a single liberal who objected to behavior of the two sadistic homosexual predators?


What an incredible lie. And to think you actually think anyone would believe you.
 
Closeted gay men ARE a menace to society.

Some of them, in order to either lie to themselves or to lie to everybody else, actaully set out by protesting WAY too much to cover their asses.

Additionally I think a lot of deniers of their own sexual natures tend to be the GAY BASHERS we hear so much about, too.

Since they cannot screw their victims, they beat them up, instead. Sex and violence are, from a male perspective, at least, very close to being the same thing.


That is why if a person is a closeted gay person they ought NOT to be allowed in sensitive positions in government, too.

They're too easily blackmailed.

I suspect that the biggest problem for gays and gay liberation comes mostly from CLOSETED SELF-LOATHING HOMOSEXUAL MEN.
 
Last edited:
He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

These ass-clown Board liberals (which is to say the loud mouth braying jackasses; not all Board liberals qualify) wouldn't comment on President Obama's homosexuality if he turned up in a gay porn video with his tongue stuck down Barney Frank's throat.

The difference? He's a Democratic!


Everyone in this forum knows I am staunchly against homosexuality, you Republitards use homosexuality and homophobia as political weapons to get votes, look at Rick Perry for example you damn moron. If Obama was gay the Republitards and Tea Farties would be even more homophobic.

If you're so "staunchly against homosexuality" then what sets you apart from other Republicans that are also staunchly against homosexuality? I haven't heard any Tea Party folks or even Republican candidates rail against homosexuals in this election. They mainly complain about the debt, spending, and taxes.
You accuse others of "using homosexuality" as a "weapon", but you don't hesitate to use it either.
:eusa_whistle:
 
I'm still pretty sure this doesn't actually answer someone getting a free pass from rape and murder as you said here. Oh and here too, where you say the only way a liberal would object is if it happened in church.


The press did give the two murderous homosexual perverts a free pass. None of the major news outlets even mentioned the case. Neither did any of the television news programs.

Also, can you quote a single liberal who objected to behavior of the two sadistic homosexual predators?

I'm pretty sure everyone's not cool with rape, murder or pedophilia. But you can continue to act like liberals are fine with it, if you want. Building strawmen's your thing, after all.
 
Closeted gay men ARE a menace to society.

Some of them, in order to either lie to themselves or to lie to everybody else, actaully set out by protesting WAY too much to cover their asses.

Additionally I think a lot of deniers of their own sexual natures tend to be the GAY BASHERS we hear so much about, too.

Since they cannot screw their victims, they beat them up, instead. Sex and violence are, from a male perspective, at least, very close to being the same thing.


That is why if a person is a closeted gay person they ought NOT to be allowed in sensitive positions in government, too.

They're too easily blackmailed.

I suspect that the biggest problem for gays and gay liberation comes mostly from CLOSETED SELF-LOATHING HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

The stupidity of your logic is baffling.

According to your logic God must be gay because he hates homosexuality and considers it an abomination.

Do you condone pedophilia? If not that must mean you hate pedophiles. And that must mean you secretly are one.

Does that make any sense? :eusa_eh:
 
Last edited:
And in every single time, they have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Now, I sure hope you are not insinuating that strait couples and straight people have never done such aggregious things. Evil people are evil...regardless of their sexuality.

The point you are so desperately trying to ignore is the fact that the "mainstream" media ignored the Jesse Dirkhising case, but it made the Mathew Sheppard case into a cause celeb. There were no media memorials for Jesse Dirkhising. None of the major newspapers or network news programs even mentioned the case. On the other hand, the Sheppard case was front page news for months.

Crimes committed by homosexuals simply aren't "newsworthy."

And since the whole point of the OP was "guilt by association," then aren't all homosexuals guilty by association with the murderers of Jesse Dirkhising? It seems the guilt by association meme only works with regard to Republicans.

It's just one more example of lib hypocrisy.
 
I'm still pretty sure this doesn't actually answer someone getting a free pass from rape and murder as you said here. Oh and here too, where you say the only way a liberal would object is if it happened in church.


The press did give the two murderous homosexual perverts a free pass. None of the major news outlets even mentioned the case. Neither did any of the television news programs.

Also, can you quote a single liberal who objected to behavior of the two sadistic homosexual predators?


What an incredible lie. And to think you actually think anyone would believe you.

Prove it's a lie. Provide a quote from a major newspaper regarding the case.
 
The press did give the two murderous homosexual perverts a free pass. None of the major news outlets even mentioned the case. Neither did any of the television news programs.

Also, can you quote a single liberal who objected to behavior of the two sadistic homosexual predators?


What an incredible lie. And to think you actually think anyone would believe you.

Prove it's a lie. Provide a quote from a major newspaper regarding the case.

You expect me to prove that liberals do not care about a crime. How very very sad a little man you are.
 
Closeted gay men ARE a menace to society.

Some of them, in order to either lie to themselves or to lie to everybody else, actaully set out by protesting WAY too much to cover their asses.

Additionally I think a lot of deniers of their own sexual natures tend to be the GAY BASHERS we hear so much about, too.

Since they cannot screw their victims, they beat them up, instead. Sex and violence are, from a male perspective, at least, very close to being the same thing.

That is why if a person is a closeted gay person they ought NOT to be allowed in sensitive positions in government, too.

They're too easily blackmailed.

I suspect that the biggest problem for gays and gay liberation comes mostly from CLOSETED SELF-LOATHING HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

The stupidity of your logic is baffling.

According to your logic God must be gay because he hates homosexuality and considers it an abomination.

Do you condone pedophilia? If not that must mean you hate pedophiles. And that must mean you secretly are one.

Does that make any sense? :eusa_eh:
The Hawk, were you aware of this? I wasn't until a couple or three days ago:
On the Pedophilia Issue:
What the APA Should Have Known

By Joseph Nicolosi, Ph.D. and Dale O'Leary
Deconstructionists argue that distinctions between the genders are arbitrary and political. Now, the same argument is being advanced by man-boy love advocates about the distinction between the generations.

An article published last summer in the American Psychological Association's Psychological Bulletin has drawn a recent firestorm of criticism. Talk show hosts and congressmen are calling for investigations. The outrage has focused on the authors' conclusion, based on their analysis of child-molestation studies, that "the negative effects [of sexual abuse] were neither pervasive nor typically intense."
The article was entitled "A Meta-analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples."
APA spokeswoman Rhea Faberman defended publication of the article as part of the scientific work of the organization, saying, "We try to create a lot of dialogue." She labeled "ridiculous" the claim of radio talk-show host Dr. Laura Schlessinger that publication of the article and the attempt to normalize pedophilia were in any way related.
Contrary to Ms. Faberman's assertion, however:


  1. There is a real and growing movement to legitimize and also legalize sexual relations between boys aged 10 to 16 and adult males;
  2. Robert Bauserman, one of the authors of the article, has associated himself with the pedophilia movement through a previous article;
  3. The movement's strategy is to promote the "objective" study of child/adult sex, free of moral considerations;
  4. The APA should have known this before they published the article.
Those who are interested in legalizing sexual relations between adults and children want to change the parameters of the discussion from the "absolutist" moral position, to the "relative" position that it can sometimes be beneficial. The A.P.A. article furthered exactly this position. source

Last week's headline was APA had decided to consider pedophilia as some kind of normal or something.

Strange new world we live in.
 
Last edited:
Closeted gay men ARE a menace to society.

Some of them, in order to either lie to themselves or to lie to everybody else, actaully set out by protesting WAY too much to cover their asses.

Additionally I think a lot of deniers of their own sexual natures tend to be the GAY BASHERS we hear so much about, too.

Since they cannot screw their victims, they beat them up, instead. Sex and violence are, from a male perspective, at least, very close to being the same thing.


That is why if a person is a closeted gay person they ought NOT to be allowed in sensitive positions in government, too.

They're too easily blackmailed.

I suspect that the biggest problem for gays and gay liberation comes mostly from CLOSETED SELF-LOATHING HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

The two sadistic perverts who murdered Jesse Dirkhising were not "closeted gay men," so your thesis is a non sequitur.
 
What an incredible lie. And to think you actually think anyone would believe you.

Prove it's a lie. Provide a quote from a major newspaper regarding the case.

You expect me to prove that liberals do not care about a crime. How very very sad a little man you are.

No, I expect you to prove that the mainstream media gave a crap. That should be a very easy thing to do if its true.

However, we all know it isn't true.
 
Last edited:
Prove it's a lie. Provide a quote from a major newspaper regarding the case.

You expect me to prove that liberals do not care about a crime. How very very sad a little man you are.

No, I expect you to prove that the mainstream media gave a crap. That should be a very easy thing to do if its true.

However, we all know it isn't true.

The mainstream media reports things. OBVIOUSLY you heard about this crime thru that mainstream media who reported it....(unless you were a participant yourself)...ergo, the mainstream media did not ignore it.

Logic isn't your strong suit, is it?
 
You expect me to prove that liberals do not care about a crime. How very very sad a little man you are.

No, I expect you to prove that the mainstream media gave a crap. That should be a very easy thing to do if its true.

However, we all know it isn't true.

The mainstream media reports things. OBVIOUSLY you heard about this crime thru that mainstream media who reported it....(unless you were a participant yourself)...ergo, the mainstream media did not ignore it.

Logic isn't your strong suit, is it?

No quotes from the mainstream media, then.

I didn't think you could find any.
 
No, I expect you to prove that the mainstream media gave a crap. That should be a very easy thing to do if its true.

However, we all know it isn't true.

The mainstream media reports things. OBVIOUSLY you heard about this crime thru that mainstream media who reported it....(unless you were a participant yourself)...ergo, the mainstream media did not ignore it.

Logic isn't your strong suit, is it?

No quotes from the mainstream media, then.

I didn't think you could find any.

Defense Points to CPR Delay - ABC News

So is ABC no longer part of the mainstream media?

Let the back peddling begin....
 
No, I expect you to prove that the mainstream media gave a crap. That should be a very easy thing to do if its true.

However, we all know it isn't true.

The mainstream media reports things. OBVIOUSLY you heard about this crime thru that mainstream media who reported it....(unless you were a participant yourself)...ergo, the mainstream media did not ignore it.

Logic isn't your strong suit, is it?

No quotes from the mainstream media, then.

I didn't think you could find any.

How did YOU find out about it?
Or did you just make it up?

Or did you participate?

Where did cripat go?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top