so, how about if they were guilty as hell, but you had no evidence you could use
what would you do then?
What do you think the mossad would do? they should be our model for how we handle terrorists, no?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
so, how about if they were guilty as hell, but you had no evidence you could use
what would you do then?
so, how about if they were guilty as hell, but you had no evidence you could use
what would you do then?
so he got out of GITMO an dsaid you know what..I'm goign to join Al Queda and they just give him the top spot for Yemen.
Not like he was affliated with them before
Just like politicians leave office not affiliated with any company and get CEO and top lobbyist positions.
name them, these politicians and the CEO jobs they got and the top lobbyist positions they got and from what companies/firms. then tell me the number of politicians who retired who did not do this.
does starting your own firm/company equal a strike against them? is the free market allergic to politicians starting their own firms?
Ray, you've been in combat, right?We need to change this thread to "Denial on the Right"
If they had any kind of evidence they would have kept him just like the 248 still there. They let him go without any charges.
I can't believe the fucking cop out you righties are putting out here.
Bush and Company totally fucked up the whole Gitmo thing. Now we need to either kill them or hold them indefinately.
What the fuck is the problem with finally trying them and determining if they are guilty or innocent.
I quit on this one. Brain dead cognitive dissonance.
I never said it was a strike. I was just pointing out that it's not as far fetched as some people think. It happens. But, I will google it real quick for ya.
We need to change this thread to "Denial on the Right"
If they had any kind of evidence they would have kept him just like the 248 still there. They let him go without any charges.
I can't believe the fucking cop out you righties are putting out here.
Bush and Company totally fucked up the whole Gitmo thing. Now we need to either kill them or hold them indefinately.
What the fuck is the problem with finally trying them and determining if they are guilty or innocent.
I quit on this one. Brain dead cognitive dissonance.
okay. you were inferring though, no? the example you sent me was egregious. even the article said 'heavy-handed' and I know pols who went out of politics who had people banging down the pol's door to get them to sign on for their knowledge ability to get access to the corridors of power.
it happens lots, but not as often as some would make one believe it does.
Ray, you've been in combat, right?
If he had ties with Al Quaeda before, why did the release him??????????
Hold me for six years in a Chinese prison and torture me, I sure as hell would do the same thing.
Let's get to the bottom line. Who is responsible for this total fuck up with these prisoners? Bush fucked up detaining them, now we need to kill them. What a buch of real Americans.
Also, funny that this guy is a frigging Saudi not an Iraqi or Afgahni?
when did prisioners of war ever have trials? My uncle was a prisoner of war in germany. Held there until the war was over. Then thankfully the germans turned him loose.
We need to change this thread to "Denial on the Right"
If they had any kind of evidence they would have kept him just like the 248 still there. They let him go without any charges.
I can't believe the fucking cop out you righties are putting out here.
Bush and Company totally fucked up the whole Gitmo thing. Now we need to either kill them or hold them indefinately.
What the fuck is the problem with finally trying them and determining if they are guilty or innocent.
I quit on this one. Brain dead cognitive dissonance.
so he got out of GITMO an dsaid you know what..I'm goign to join Al Queda and they just give him the top spot for Yemen.
Not like he was affliated with them before
See, stupid statements like this make anything you say of little value. There was a reason this guy was detained, and there was a reason he couldn't be tried.
says who? reasonable people have disagreed. what do you base your opinion on? The word of people not sworn under oath?You make the assumption that everyone in the world should have the right to a fair and speedy trial, regardless of what their objectives may be. These people are not criminals in the normal sense; they are enemy combatants and always will be.
Bush did not fuck up by detaining them; he did the only thing he could do that made any sense. But you just won't get it until we get hit again, even harder next time. You think these people hate Americans because of GW? You are completely lost.
No, I really wasn't. I'm not saying it's wrong but it could be the same with this guy. They knew he was in Guantanimo and they knew he had contact with other prisoners. Maybe they said they would take care of his family for information and give him a well paying post in the administration/organization. I don't condone what he did but there is more to this than is being released. I understand your point though.