Reebok joins the “Gender” Madness…

[Curried Goats]

What size skirt do you wear soiboi?

Some cultures are fancier than others I guess...

 

[Bob Blaylock]

This is why people hate the left. They embrace men in skirts and call anyone who thinks this fucking sick shit is fucking sick a bigot.

Men in skirts isn't the worst of it.

Sick fucks like Tainted Tommy call us “bigots” to want to protect children from pedophiles.

 

[Curried Goats]

Men in skirts isn't the worst of it.

Sick fucks like Tainted Tommy call us “bigots” to want to protect children from pedophiles.

Bigots often talk about wanting to "protect children" as an excuse for promoting their bigotry. At the end of the day you both are making claims of bigotry on one side and pedophilia on the other. It's on you to provide evidence of your claims. Wearing skirts isn't a sign of pedophilia, which isn't gender specific. Pedophiles go after both boys and girls but you're not opposed to girls wearing skirts are you?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Bigots often talk about wanting to "protect children" as an excuse for promoting their bigotry. At the end of the day you both are making claims of bigotry on one side and pedophilia on the other. It's on you to provide evidence of your claims. Wearing skirts isn't a sign of pedophilia, which isn't gender specific. Pedophiles go after both boys and girls but you're not opposed to girls wearing skirts are you?

You have, on multiple occasions, openly defended pedophile sand their foul activities.

It is no wonder that you hate and dismiss any who want children to be protected from the sorts of abuse that you openly defend and advocate.

You are one seriously fucked-up piece of subhuman shit.

And it's no wonder that you defend this shit as well.

 

[Curried Goats]

You have, on multiple occasions, openly defended pedophile sand their foul activities.

That's a claim. Now, can you provide any evidence to support it?

It is no wonder that you hate and dismiss any who want children to be protected from the sorts of abuse that you openly defend and advocate.

Which would be what? Describe this abuse.

You are one seriously fucked-up piece of subhuman shit.

There there.

And it's no wonder that you defend this shit as well.

Again, what shit? You've provided no evidence of me defending any sort of pedophilia.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Faggotry

 

[Orangecat]

What a flaming faggot. I wonder which liberal USMB poster that is?

I'm certain they'd plead the 5th under interrogation.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Again, what shit? You've provided no evidence of me defending any sort of pedophilia.

Everywhere that you are defending any of this fucked-up sexual perversion being “taught” to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

Everywhere that you defend “gender-affirming care” being applied to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

Every time you defend “Drag Queens”, faggots, trannies, and related fucked-up sexual perverts being given access to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

And every time you condemn sane, decent people for opposing this and other related shit being done to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

 

[Curried Goats]

Everywhere that you are defending any of this fucked-up sexual perversion being “taught” to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

If it's everywhere you'd think you'd be able to produce some...

Everywhere that you defend “gender-affirming care” being applied to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

No. Gender affirming care isn't pedophilia. It doesn't become pedophilia just because a soy boy like you is all in their feels.

Every time you defend “Drag Queens”, faggots, trannies, and related fucked-up sexual perverts being given access to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

No, we're just giving you enough to prove your bigotry.

And every time you condemn sane, decent people for opposing this and other related shit being done to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

You people aren't sane. You're deplorable mutants who's ideas exist on the fringes of decent society.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Everywhere that you are defending any of this fucked-up sexual perversion being “taught” to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

Everywhere that you defend “gender-affirming care” being applied to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

Every time you defend “Drag Queens”, faggots, trannies, and related fucked-up sexual perverts being given access to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

And every time you condemn sane, decent people for opposing this and other related shit being done to children, you are openly, blatantly defending the sexual abuse of children; you are defending pedophilia.

^^ crackpot

 

[Zincwarrior]

It takes a Scot to wear a skirt.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

No. Gender affirming care isn't pedophilia. It doesn't become pedophilia just because a soy boy like you is all in their feels.

When applied to children, yes, it absolutely and undeniably is; as is every other involvement of children in fucked-up sexual perversions.

You people aren't sane. You're deplorable mutants who's ideas exist on the fringes of decent society.

You believe that a boy can be a girl. This proves you to be a fucked-up loon.

This leaves you in no position whatsoever to cast aspersions on anyone else's mental soundness.

 

[marvin martian]

Check this out. A “Unisex Pride Skirt”. Very obviously a feminine garment, but they are selling it as part of their “Gender-Free Unity Collection”, and implying that it is to be worn by male, female, or any of the other 54i genders. And showing it worn by a model that appears to be male, for rather light-loafered values of “male”.

I guess Reebok no longer wants the business of people who are not fucked in the heads, and who still know the difference between male and female.

Pride Skirt - Chalk | Reebok

Shop for Pride Skirt - Chalk at Reebok.com. See all the styles and colors of Pride Skirt - Chalk at the official Reebok online store. You are who you are all year long. So, show up and stand out every single month of the year when you wear this Reebok tennis-inspired skirt. The signature logo...

www.reebok.com

View attachment 812560

I had no idea that company still existed.

 

[marvin martian]

It takes a Scot to wear a skirt.
View attachment 812817

We call them Scots. You call them women.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I had no idea that company still existed.

They still make shoes and athletic gear. Not expensive. No bigs.

 

[Zincwarrior]

We call them Scots. You call them women.

Sometimes I call them fuzzie wuzzies.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

They still make shoes and athletic gear. Not expensive. No bigs.

And women's skirts that they try to sell as being also appropriate for men or for any of the 2+54i genders to wear.

 

[Zincwarrior]

And women's skirts that they try to sell as being also appropriate for men or for any of the 2+54i genders to wear.

Fair enough. I just get shoes. I am not certain where the wife gets her stuff.

 

[d0gbreath]

And women's skirts that they try to sell as being also appropriate for men or for any of the 2+54i genders to wear.

If you don't want to wear a skirt Bob. Don't wear one.

 

[blackhawk]

I buy New Balance I don’t think they have boarded the bat shit crazy train yet.