OK so you know more than the people that were there and all the scientist that reviewed the forensics. God it must hurt to be so fucking smart.
Well I am smart. But not smart enough to figure out what part of my scenario differs greatly from the people who wrote the report you mentioned. So point out to me how it differs.
Did the cop pull right up to the suspects?
Did the cop try and get out and got slammed back in the vehicle and punched?
Did the cop and kid fight for the cops gun?
Did the kid get shot?
Did the kid back away from the SUV?
And the cop got out and started firing?
And the kid charged the cop cause of trying to save his (Browns) life?
Ahha, that's not what the report says is it? No one can ask the kid what motivated him to charge at a cop shooting him over and over. He's dead. It just couldn't be that that was the only course of action he had. Well he could have turned and been shot in the back. Which ultimately would have been better for all. Seeing as how the cop was determined to kill the kid anyway.
The report you like believes this kid was such a bad mother fucker that even after being shot 5 or 6 times that he was gonna kill that nice police man that wouldn't stop shooting him.
Believe what you want. None of us were there. The cop was a pussy and deserves the nightmares and whatever else is coming his way. As far as I am concerned.