jillian
Princess
.
One can only imagine how much time and effort Eric Holder and his staff spent trying to incriminate Officer Darren Wilson. Alas, it appears the policeman has been exonerated.
As I recall, there was a group of people here (do I really need to identify them?) who spent a similar amount of effort assuming the worst about Wilson's actions, declaring him guilty without knowing what the Grand Jury knew, and (of course) leveraging his assumed "guilt" to essentially condemn (white) police officers everywhere.
First, some congratulations. You were able to destroy the career of a (white) police officer, and you played a role in the environment that put his life at risk, and that of his family. As I understand it, he's still (understandably) in hiding.
You have also doubtlessly intimidated (white) police officers from coast to coast, who will now often (understandably) think twice when dealing with black suspects, which could not only put their own lives at further risk, but also possibly the lives and safety of other victims or potential victims.
Evidently this was all part of the plan, so congratulations on that victory.
Now that you have that, I'm curious. Do you:
(a) ...have even the tiniest bit of remorse or regret for the words you used regarding Officer Wilson? A little bit of shame or embarrassment? Or...
(b) ...plan on just avoiding, denying and/or deflecting so that you don't have to be responsible for the nasty words and sentiments you have provided?
So is it (a) or (b)?
Nice to pretend that holder wasn't fair.
Let me know when the rightwingnuts express one note of regret that the cops in the area engaged in a pattern and practice of racism
There was no indication of that about Wilson, who is the actual topic of the thread. You just provide more ignorant deflection from the real subject.
No. There wasn't ENOUGH for a civil rights action. There was for an indictment but the DA screwed it up intentionally
More BS, the DOJ agreed with the conclusions of the grand jury and was more specific as to why, the evidence didn't support anything but the ultimate conclusion that Wilson acted properly.
You don't understand the criteria for a 1983 action OR for an indictment.