C
crazy canadian
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
No, I mean donated wealth. People who have made it, and then some. Or people who just want to give to charity. Just think about it yourself. My kids just woke up. Gotta go for now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Any form of economics is tyranny? that's nuts.
Originally posted by crazy canadian
How much money is enough for a person?
I asked what each person thinks personally. If you didn't have to worry about anyone else. I'm not deciding for anyone else.
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
or cashews or peanuts. its still the truth in many applications
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
name one.
Originally posted by crazy canadian
Dude with crazy hair:
I'm not saying how much money someone is 'allowed to have', I'm asking you, not fighting you. Do you have an answer?
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
using the courts to outfinance your competitors (the little guy) to enforce some capitalist objective.
Originally posted by crazy canadian
Support Inner City capitalism. Fight for all. I gotta jet.
Originally posted by crazy canadian
No, I mean donated wealth. People who have made it, and then some. Or people who just want to give to charity. Just think about it yourself. My kids just woke up. Gotta go for now.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
That's not illustrative of how economics is tyranny. That's an example of how government can be corrupted.
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
how government can be corrupted or how the judicial process can be abused? either way its still a form of economic tyranny by allowing the wealthier of the two outlast the least wealthy by financial attrition, hence its tyrannical.
Originally posted by gop_jeff
Wow...
1. Government compulsed wealth redistribution should be terminated immediately. The government has no right to force me to pay my hard-earned money to someone else. HOWEVER, I am all for private charities, and I think if there were no welfare programs in the US, private charities, both secualr and (gasp) religious, would step up. In fact, my church runs a halfway house for single moms in our city, and though we are certainly not South Central LA, we have our fair share of poor people, and I'm glad to be helping out.
2. Socialism, as a form of government, goes against the God-given rights that we have, including the right to keep what I earn. If someone wants to form a commune or socialized health/education co-op, more power to them. But by forcing that system on a population, you are, in effect, enslaving that population to the whims of the ruling/elite class, who makes economic decisions for you.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
but it's not economics that's the problem. It's government corruption. If a company puts another out of business without corruption, is that still tyranny by economics?
Anytime a company goes out of business from better competition, it's tyranny. That's truly insane.