President Trump appears to float MAJOR shakeup!

Yeah, the fact that Trump is criticizing the people investigating him isn't exactly new. He knows it would be political suicide to fire Mueller. There just are not enough Trump fanatics in the country to float that one.
President Trump doesn't have to fire him. AG Sessions can and should. Its not INDEPENDENT when you hire the enemies lawyers to "investigate" its a witch hunt.


Everyone LOVED Mueller.








Until he started to investigate.

Or until he started filling his team with Clinton supporters which looks like bias, stupid stupid move on his part

There's both Dems and Republicans on his team. Does the presence of Republicans look like bias and a stupid stupid move on his part? :rolleyes:

I SAID Clinton supporters, his team is full of them. Save it for someone that doesn't know the score. Idiotic move on Mueller's part
 
Yeah, the fact that Trump is criticizing the people investigating him isn't exactly new. He knows it would be political suicide to fire Mueller. There just are not enough Trump fanatics in the country to float that one.
President Trump doesn't have to fire him. AG Sessions can and should. Its not INDEPENDENT when you hire the enemies lawyers to "investigate" its a witch hunt.


Everyone LOVED Mueller.








Until he started to investigate.

Or until he started filling his team with Clinton supporters which looks like bias, stupid stupid move on his part

There's both Dems and Republicans on his team. Does the presence of Republicans look like bias and a stupid stupid move on his part? :rolleyes:

I SAID Clinton supporters, his team is full of them. Save it for someone that doesn't know the score. Idiotic move on Mueller's part

Oh brother.

"Clinton" supporters - they voted Dem, probably like a bunch of "Trump" supporters voted Republican in the anyone but Clinton/Trump mode.

This is a pathetic argument because it implies people can't possibly be professional and do their jobs. Are we so divided and partisan? I guess so.
 
President Trump doesn't have to fire him. AG Sessions can and should. Its not INDEPENDENT when you hire the enemies lawyers to "investigate" its a witch hunt.


Everyone LOVED Mueller.








Until he started to investigate.

Or until he started filling his team with Clinton supporters which looks like bias, stupid stupid move on his part

There's both Dems and Republicans on his team. Does the presence of Republicans look like bias and a stupid stupid move on his part? :rolleyes:

I SAID Clinton supporters, his team is full of them. Save it for someone that doesn't know the score. Idiotic move on Mueller's part

Oh brother.

"Clinton" supporters - they voted Dem, probably like a bunch of "Trump" supporters voted Republican in the anyone but Clinton/Trump mode.

This is a pathetic argument because it implies people can't possibly be professional and do their jobs. Are we so divided and partisan? I guess so.

You guess a lot of stuff. The moment Muller started doing it he lost credibility, that and he's chummy with the weasel Comey. That right here is where he should rescue himself after the memo/tape crap
 
Mueller is very well respected on both sides of the aisle, he has a great record of civil and military service. AND he's a Republican.

Like I said - they loved him until he started to investigate.
 
This is the most indepth and informative article on Russian actions yet and it's damning: Obama’s secret struggle to punish Russia for Putin’s election assault

Partisans are fools not to take it seriously.


For a long time now, I've asked why the RWs side against the US and with Pooting. They never really answer.

I never thought I would see this in my own country and I'm ashamed of them, just as Im ashed of the racism, antisemitism, the hatred and disdain for children in the US and around the world and on and on.

A segment of the US lives in its own very nasty bubble.

Thanks for posting this.

accuse-the-other-side-of-that-which-you-are-guilty-10588066.png

"They rig elections folks, they rig elections." - Donald J. Trump
 
This is the most indepth and informative article on Russian actions yet and it's damning: Obama’s secret struggle to punish Russia for Putin’s election assault

Partisans are fools not to take it seriously.


Conflating two subjects is what regressives do best. Subject 1: Russia did their thing.
Subject 2: Accusations that the Trump campaign some how coordinated with Russia.
There's evidence of Subject 1, so far none for Subject 2.

You want folks to take it seriously, stop trying to intermingle the two separate subjects.


.

I consistently haven't but both the left and the RIGHT have done so. When we try to talk about Russian hacking - the RIGHT cry No Collusion! (This is their newest rallying cry - it used to be No Evidence of Russian Hacking).

There are actually 3 subjects:
Russian hacking and attempts to influence the election - this is by far the most serious.
Possible colusion with Trump Campaign members.
Possible colusion with Trump himself.

Subject #1 - is pretty much substantiated.
Subject #2 - is currently under investigation
Subject #3 - doesn't seem likely (which is why Trump needs to STFU and let them do their work instead of doing stuff that looks like cover up and obstruction)


If you want to look at it that way, on Subject 2 - many who have been involved with unclassified and classified briefings say there is no evidence of wrong doing on people involved in the campaign.

Subject 3: Comey came right out and said Trump was not being investigated. Would have been nice if Comey had said that publicly in Jan, instead of keeping quiet and fueling all the regressive speculation. Personally I think his refusal to do so is what got him fired. Trump got what he wanted by firing Comey, Comey finally told the public what he said 3 different times privately.


.

The reason I say what I did on subject 2 and 3 is it is still UNDER investigation - it's not concluded.

It would have been highly inappropriate to say anything before it's concluded - that is the way they normally do this. Why would you expect Trump to be handled any differently?


What was there to conclude on Trump, when there never was an investigation on him? Even after the press said there was an obstruction investigation, the Deputy AG came out and said don't believe everything you read form anonymous sources. The only thing you can bet on, at this point, on collusion and obstruction, is the regressives will drag out the narrative as long as possible. Shiff admitted that have nothing that could be presented to a jury.


.
 
Yeah, the fact that Trump is criticizing the people investigating him isn't exactly new. He knows it would be political suicide to fire Mueller. There just are not enough Trump fanatics in the country to float that one.

I hope you're right. I didn't think there were enough crazies to elect that orange fool.
oh so you're stepping out that putin voted? how many times and where?

Wow. Your silly crap is on high today, isn't it?
it's your comment jack.

Refresh my memory. Where did I say anything like that?
I see you ain't got the smarts to look at your own post. well here:
I hope you're right. I didn't think there were enough crazies to elect that orange fool.
 
Yeah, the fact that Trump is criticizing the people investigating him isn't exactly new. He knows it would be political suicide to fire Mueller. There just are not enough Trump fanatics in the country to float that one.
President Trump doesn't have to fire him. AG Sessions can and should. Its not INDEPENDENT when you hire the enemies lawyers to "investigate" its a witch hunt.

The fact is that the lawyers that Mueller hired has outstanding legal records.

James Quarles was assistant prosecutor for the Watergate investigation

Andrew Weismann is the current head of the Justice Department's Criminal Frauds Division. He was a prosecutor in the Enron case and has tried numerous cases against mobsters which includes the Gambino and Genovese crime families

Jeannie Rhee worked for the Justice Department as a advisor to the President and AG on issues of executive power and national security

Michael Dreeben is a deputy in the Solicitor General's office. He has argued more than 100 cases before the Supreme Court

The fact is that you consider anyone who stands on principle to be a enemy.
well if they stood on principles they'd say there is no there and close the investigation now that we know there never was a hack.
 
President Trump doesn't have to fire him. AG Sessions can and should. Its not INDEPENDENT when you hire the enemies lawyers to "investigate" its a witch hunt.

Sessions can. I'm not sure, but I think he is the only person that can. Of course, he promised to recuse himself from this investigation, and nobody would believe he would fire him unless trump told him to.
Just because he recused himself doesn't mean he isn't paying attention to what's going on. Everyone can see what's going on.

If he recused himself, he can't poke his nose into it and fire anybody.
how would you know? ruh-roh

Because that's what recusal means dumb ass,
whoa, if they are going after someone's financials off on a tangent, then he is back in. or any obstruction, because the initial investigation was russia on counter intelligence. Going after an individual bank account for no reason can now include him. see how that works, the counsel went astray. time to pick up the pole and reel him in.
 
Yeah, the fact that Trump is criticizing the people investigating him isn't exactly new. He knows it would be political suicide to fire Mueller. There just are not enough Trump fanatics in the country to float that one.
President Trump doesn't have to fire him. AG Sessions can and should. Its not INDEPENDENT when you hire the enemies lawyers to "investigate" its a witch hunt.


Everyone LOVED Mueller.








Until he started to investigate.

Or until he started filling his team with Clinton supporters which looks like bias, stupid stupid move on his part

You'll grab at anything to whine about, won't you? My mechanic has stock in Ford. Does that mean I can't trust him to work on a Dodge?
 
I hope you're right. I didn't think there were enough crazies to elect that orange fool.
oh so you're stepping out that putin voted? how many times and where?

Wow. Your silly crap is on high today, isn't it?
it's your comment jack.

Refresh my memory. Where did I say anything like that?
I see you ain't got the smarts to look at your own post. well here:
I hope you're right. I didn't think there were enough crazies to elect that orange fool.

What has MY remark got to do with the dumb shit you are accusing me of, dumb ass? I didn't mention Putin.
 
Sessions can. I'm not sure, but I think he is the only person that can. Of course, he promised to recuse himself from this investigation, and nobody would believe he would fire him unless trump told him to.
Just because he recused himself doesn't mean he isn't paying attention to what's going on. Everyone can see what's going on.

If he recused himself, he can't poke his nose into it and fire anybody.
how would you know? ruh-roh

Because that's what recusal means dumb ass,
whoa, if they are going after someone's financials off on a tangent, then he is back in. or any obstruction, because the initial investigation was russia on counter intelligence. Going after an individual bank account for no reason can now include him. see how that works, the counsel went astray. time to pick up the pole and reel him in.

It's known that he has financial dealings with Russia. Those records could shine a light on any involvement he might have had with Russia attacking our elections. If you want to talk about going off on a tangent, how did an investigation into Vince Foster's death or Whitewater end up digging into Clinton's blowjob?
 
Yeah, the fact that Trump is criticizing the people investigating him isn't exactly new. He knows it would be political suicide to fire Mueller. There just are not enough Trump fanatics in the country to float that one.
President Trump doesn't have to fire him. AG Sessions can and should. Its not INDEPENDENT when you hire the enemies lawyers to "investigate" its a witch hunt.


Everyone LOVED Mueller.








Until he started to investigate.
Nope. Until he loaded his team with the enemy. They hate President Trump for beating their messiah in November and CAN NOT be expected to be truthful nor fair.
 
Just because he recused himself doesn't mean he isn't paying attention to what's going on. Everyone can see what's going on.

If he recused himself, he can't poke his nose into it and fire anybody.
how would you know? ruh-roh

Because that's what recusal means dumb ass,
whoa, if they are going after someone's financials off on a tangent, then he is back in. or any obstruction, because the initial investigation was russia on counter intelligence. Going after an individual bank account for no reason can now include him. see how that works, the counsel went astray. time to pick up the pole and reel him in.

It's known that he has financial dealings with Russia. Those records could shine a light on any involvement he might have had with Russia attacking our elections. If you want to talk about going off on a tangent, how did an investigation into Vince Foster's death or Whitewater end up digging into Clinton's blowjob?
You know that how?
 
If he recused himself, he can't poke his nose into it and fire anybody.
how would you know? ruh-roh

Because that's what recusal means dumb ass,
whoa, if they are going after someone's financials off on a tangent, then he is back in. or any obstruction, because the initial investigation was russia on counter intelligence. Going after an individual bank account for no reason can now include him. see how that works, the counsel went astray. time to pick up the pole and reel him in.

It's known that he has financial dealings with Russia. Those records could shine a light on any involvement he might have had with Russia attacking our elections. If you want to talk about going off on a tangent, how did an investigation into Vince Foster's death or Whitewater end up digging into Clinton's blowjob?
You know that how?

Which part?
 
how would you know? ruh-roh

Because that's what recusal means dumb ass,
whoa, if they are going after someone's financials off on a tangent, then he is back in. or any obstruction, because the initial investigation was russia on counter intelligence. Going after an individual bank account for no reason can now include him. see how that works, the counsel went astray. time to pick up the pole and reel him in.

It's known that he has financial dealings with Russia. Those records could shine a light on any involvement he might have had with Russia attacking our elections. If you want to talk about going off on a tangent, how did an investigation into Vince Foster's death or Whitewater end up digging into Clinton's blowjob?
You know that how?

Which part?
Financial part! Seemed obvious except to you. Funny
 
Because that's what recusal means dumb ass,
whoa, if they are going after someone's financials off on a tangent, then he is back in. or any obstruction, because the initial investigation was russia on counter intelligence. Going after an individual bank account for no reason can now include him. see how that works, the counsel went astray. time to pick up the pole and reel him in.

It's known that he has financial dealings with Russia. Those records could shine a light on any involvement he might have had with Russia attacking our elections. If you want to talk about going off on a tangent, how did an investigation into Vince Foster's death or Whitewater end up digging into Clinton's blowjob?
You know that how?

Which part?
Financial part! Seemed obvious except to you. Funny


Trump's Been Talking About His Business Interests in Russia for 30 Years
 

Forum List

Back
Top