- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,005
- 2,180
So thirty years ago he was colluding with Putin? Dude fk you made me spit my drink againFinancial part! Seemed obvious except to you. FunnyYou know that how?whoa, if they are going after someone's financials off on a tangent, then he is back in. or any obstruction, because the initial investigation was russia on counter intelligence. Going after an individual bank account for no reason can now include him. see how that works, the counsel went astray. time to pick up the pole and reel him in.
It's known that he has financial dealings with Russia. Those records could shine a light on any involvement he might have had with Russia attacking our elections. If you want to talk about going off on a tangent, how did an investigation into Vince Foster's death or Whitewater end up digging into Clinton's blowjob?
Which part?
Trump's Been Talking About His Business Interests in Russia for 30 Years