President Obama nominates Loretta Lynch as next Attorney General

Shittdude, You made two totally ignorant, stupid and racist statements:
1. She's unqualified because she is Black.
2. No Black person could be smarter than a White Person.

Now, you have made other equally stupid and untrue comments about a person you have never met.

Pretty much pegs you as a shittydude racist.

Carry on...
 
In her favor, Rudy Giuliani was on a Fox program the other night and said she was a good prosecutor; that he had worked with her and thought she was an appropriate choice.

In a Democratic Administration, she probably is about as law and order as you get.

Now, on the negative side:

1. No one should be chosen because they are of a protected class (black, woman, etc.). That's reverse discrimination and it is every bit the same as original discrimination.

2. I am very concerned about her closeness to Al Sharpton.

3. As I posted earlier, the fact that she is a sorority sister (contemporaneous and at the same school) as Holder's wife smacks of elitism and the buddy system. Imagine if this was the W Administration and the principals were white.

4. Finally, can't we please for once have someone who did not go to an Ivy League university? There are plenty of excellent schools -- and top notch graduates -- elsewhere in the country.
 
In her favor, Rudy Giuliani was on a Fox program the other night and said she was a good prosecutor; that he had worked with her and thought she was an appropriate choice.

In a Democratic Administration, she probably is about as law and order as you get.

Now, on the negative side:

1. No one should be chosen because they are of a protected class (black, woman, etc.). That's reverse discrimination and it is every bit the same as original discrimination.

2. I am very concerned about her closeness to Al Sharpton.

3. As I posted earlier, the fact that she is a sorority sister (contemporaneous and at the same school) as Holder's wife smacks of elitism and the buddy system. Imagine if this was the W Administration and the principals were white.

4. Finally, can't we please for once have someone who did not go to an Ivy League university? There are plenty of excellent schools -- and top notch graduates -- elsewhere in the country.

Well, sparky, when you become president - you can choose whomever you wish. Until then...
 
I don't know much about her other than what I read about her recently, but I would disqualify her based on her association with Al Sharpton. That's more than enough reason to disqualify her.
 
1. Obama is President.
2. Obama is Democrat.
3. AG is cabinet position.
4. Presidents choose cabinet members.
5. End of story.
 
Last edited:
president's anti white choices have to be confirmed...

How is Lynch "anti-white" - because she's not white? Why should Lynch not be confirmed - because she's black and knows Al Sharpton? Funny...and racist...

she more than "knows" sharpton.

How about a white AG that is friends with david duke?
you'd be ok with that, wouldn't you?...right?

:popcorn:

How about a white AG that is friends with Al Sharpton? Many people have friends who are political opposites - even family members.
 
Last edited:
president's anti white choices have to be confirmed...

How is Lynch "anti-white" - because she's not white? Why should Lynch not be confirmed - because she's black and knows Al Sharpton? Funny...and racist...

she more than "knows" sharpton.

How about a white AG that is friends with david duke?
you'd be ok with that, wouldn't you?...right?

:popcorn:

How about a white AG that is friends with Al Sharpton? Many people have friends who are political opposites - even family members.

She should not be confirmed. We don't need another racist AG.
 
president's anti white choices have to be confirmed...

How is Lynch "anti-white" - because she's not white? Why should Lynch not be confirmed - because she's black and knows Al Sharpton? Funny...and racist...

she more than "knows" sharpton.

How about a white AG that is friends with david duke?
you'd be ok with that, wouldn't you?...right?

:popcorn:

How about a white AG that is friends with Al Sharpton? Many people have friends who are political opposites - even family members.

She should not be confirmed. We don't need another racist AG.

Please provide "credible" proof that Lynch is a racist.
 
In her favor, Rudy Giuliani was on a Fox program the other night and said she was a good prosecutor; that he had worked with her and thought she was an appropriate choice.

In a Democratic Administration, she probably is about as law and order as you get.

Now, on the negative side:

1. No one should be chosen because they are of a protected class (black, woman, etc.). That's reverse discrimination and it is every bit the same as original discrimination.

2. I am very concerned about her closeness to Al Sharpton.

3. As I posted earlier, the fact that she is a sorority sister (contemporaneous and at the same school) as Holder's wife smacks of elitism and the buddy system. Imagine if this was the W Administration and the principals were white.

4. Finally, can't we please for once have someone who did not go to an Ivy League university? There are plenty of excellent schools -- and top notch graduates -- elsewhere in the country.

Well, sparky, when you become president - you can choose whomever you wish. Until then...

I'm sure you were full of complaints about W's picks, and you will also complain about the picks of our coming Republican President in 2016.

In the meantime, I have the right to make comments about this pick and what I see are problems with it.
 
president's anti white choices have to be confirmed...

How is Lynch "anti-white" - because she's not white? Why should Lynch not be confirmed - because she's black and knows Al Sharpton? Funny...and racist...

she more than "knows" sharpton.

How about a white AG that is friends with david duke?
you'd be ok with that, wouldn't you?...right?

:popcorn:

How about a white AG that is friends with Al Sharpton? Many people have friends who are political opposites - even family members.

She should not be confirmed. We don't need another racist AG.

Please provide "credible" proof that Lynch is a racist.



Obama AG Nominee Lynch: Voter ID Laws were Passed by Racist Southerners, Must be Stopped
• November 8, 2014

In a speech given at Long Beach earlier this year, President Obama’s new nominee for Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, specifically called out voter ID laws as racist and schools as disproportionately using zero tolerance policies against minorities.
The remarks came at the end of a long speech, explaining the examples that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela set for people.

Ms. Lynch then began talking about the inequities that she sees in the United States.

“There’s still more work to do,” Ms. Lynch explained. “People tell us the Dream is not realized because dreams never are. Mandela and King knew we had to continue working, and I’d be remiss if I didn’t tell you, that under this President and under this Attorney General, that the Department of Justice is committed to following through with those dreams.”
She continued, “50 years after the march on Washington, 50 years after the civil rights movement, we stand in this country at a time when we see people trying to take back so much of what Dr. King fought for. We stand in this country. People try and take over the State House and reverse the goals that have been made in voting in this country.
“But I’m proud to tell you that the Department of Justice has looked at these laws and looked at what’s happening in the Deep South, and in my home state of North Carolina has brought lawsuits against those voting rights changes that seek to limit out ability to stand up and exercise our rights as citizens. And those lawsuits will continue.”

Ms. Lynch was no doubt talking about the Justice Department’s lawsuit against North Carolina to stop their voter ID laws. Eric Holder even used the same kind of language as Lynch: “Allowing limits on voting rights that disproportionately exclude minority voters would be inconsistent with our ideals as a nation,” he explained.

It is plain to see that Ms. Lynch is arguing that people in the “Deep South” have passed these laws so that minority voters would be disenfranchised.
 
1. Obama is President.
2. Obama is Democrat.
3. AG is cabinet position.
4. Presidents choose cabinet members.
5. End of story.

With the advice and consent of the Senate. If I were a Senator, I'd vote against her.

Lynch should have no problem getting Senate confirmation. Wall Street loves her.

The Republican Senate Will Love Loretta Lynch
that's the same wall street that obama bailed out, right?
 
Simple fact.

She will be approved during the lame duck session.

End of the rant. BHO like GWB has the right to have who he wants in his cabinet.
 
How is Lynch "anti-white" - because she's not white? Why should Lynch not be confirmed - because she's black and knows Al Sharpton? Funny...and racist...

she more than "knows" sharpton.

How about a white AG that is friends with david duke?
you'd be ok with that, wouldn't you?...right?

:popcorn:

How about a white AG that is friends with Al Sharpton? Many people have friends who are political opposites - even family members.

She should not be confirmed. We don't need another racist AG.

Please provide "credible" proof that Lynch is a racist.



Obama AG Nominee Lynch: Voter ID Laws were Passed by Racist Southerners, Must be Stopped
• November 8, 2014

In a speech given at Long Beach earlier this year, President Obama’s new nominee for Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, specifically called out voter ID laws as racist and schools as disproportionately using zero tolerance policies against minorities.
The remarks came at the end of a long speech, explaining the examples that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela set for people.

Ms. Lynch then began talking about the inequities that she sees in the United States.

“There’s still more work to do,” Ms. Lynch explained. “People tell us the Dream is not realized because dreams never are. Mandela and King knew we had to continue working, and I’d be remiss if I didn’t tell you, that under this President and under this Attorney General, that the Department of Justice is committed to following through with those dreams.”
She continued, “50 years after the march on Washington, 50 years after the civil rights movement, we stand in this country at a time when we see people trying to take back so much of what Dr. King fought for. We stand in this country. People try and take over the State House and reverse the goals that have been made in voting in this country.
“But I’m proud to tell you that the Department of Justice has looked at these laws and looked at what’s happening in the Deep South, and in my home state of North Carolina has brought lawsuits against those voting rights changes that seek to limit out ability to stand up and exercise our rights as citizens. And those lawsuits will continue.”

Ms. Lynch was no doubt talking about the Justice Department’s lawsuit against North Carolina to stop their voter ID laws. Eric Holder even used the same kind of language as Lynch: “Allowing limits on voting rights that disproportionately exclude minority voters would be inconsistent with our ideals as a nation,” he explained.

It is plain to see that Ms. Lynch is arguing that people in the “Deep South” have passed these laws so that minority voters would be disenfranchised.

Where is the "link" for your article? So far - you are plagiarizing...
 

Forum List

Back
Top