Poll: Is Bernie Sanders too extreme to win the General Election?

[alpine]

I like the old dude, but he'll likely go the way of Ron Paul on the Republican side. His Party powers-that-be will likely turn on him and go with Clinton. Doesn't look like the country's ready for him.

Doubtful--They know that Bernie is still playing with kids gloves on.

The Big Banks have their Candidate. The cash is going to Clinton. I don't think Sanders stands a chance.

The one who knows that the most is Sanders.

However, he has woken a sleeping giant. A mass of people that truly hates capitalism. It is not a revolution as of yet. However, it is not good for the structure of the Party

The next couple of decades can become a perilous time for the Democrats "Big Tent". Especially if the far left take their signals from the far right and realize that now is the time to split and form their own party.

The liberals were cheering about the changing Demographics!! But "what if" it come with changing political alliances as well?

We could very well see an ideological pure "Right" and "Left" party with Liberal Republicans and Big Corp Liberals making up the middle!! Where would you stand in this new alignment!!??

Power would be hard to come by in such a system. In fact, the grip of power would be very slippery, changing hands as fast as House changes political make up!!

I thrive for such a future in American politics!

Go Bernie Go!

In fact, these 2 opposites, are quite similar.

This is not about Bernie or Trump.

Demographics never changed. There are 3 layers in this country; poor, mid class, rich.

Mid Class have always been voting with the Rich, up until this election cycle.

Why?

Because Rich fucked MC over with 2008 crash, big time.

Poor was already poor, so they may not have minded much, but MC.....

You dont fuck with the MC, oh you DONT!!!

 

[amrchaos]

You are giving too much credit too the class structure. But there is great strain in the ideological make up as well.

Think about it, the "rich" was not able to screw the middle class without some Democratic enabling. Where was the far left during the bail out? They were being pacified with more handouts and other trinkets!!

OWS demonstrations showed that was not enough

 

[alpine]

You are giving too much credit too the class structure. But there is great strain in the ideological make up as well.

Think about it, the "rich" was not able to screw the middle class without some Democratic enabling. Where was the far left during the bail out? They were being pacified with more handouts and other trinkets!!

OWS demonstrations showed that was not enough

None of this matters.

It is only and only, what is being said that is important, "the message"...

And it don't even matter who says it.


I think Sanders will get this election with his anti rich rhetoric. Very powerful in this climate, even swept Hillary aside, Hillary had to go against the rich and say she will not take any more donations from them.

These people are pissed, you can tell...
And you cant really negotiate with people when they are pissed...

 

[ScienceRocks]

Cruz is far more extreme and is less likely to win the general. Obama won by 360 electorals in 2008 and 332 in 2012 against the idea of reducing welfare, cutting science and other dumb republican ideas. Bernie is closer to Obama.

 

[Billy000]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

Bernie Sanders has about as much chance of becoming President as I do - NONE.

I think if people judge him on his core values, he has the chance of winning in 2016.

If as president could he transform our healthcare system? Probably not, but many of his other policies are obtainable and I know he would continue to push policies that would help the middle class and poor.

Let's also not forget he is currently beating Trump and any other republican by a large margin in hypothetical matchups of the general population.

 

[OKTexas]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

You forgot the third reason, dems don't seem to like to elect actors to the presidency. That alone leaves Bernie at the curb.

 

[OKTexas]

Cruz is far more extreme and is less likely to win the general. Obama won by 360 electorals in 2008 and 332 in 2012 against the idea of reducing welfare, cutting science and other dumb republican ideas. Bernie is closer to Obama.

Lying again matt, your dear leader didn't win by any such margins. Just talking out of your ass again I guess.

 

[OKTexas]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

Bernie Sanders has about as much chance of becoming President as I do - NONE.

I think if people judge him on his core values, he has the chance of winning in 2016.

If as president could he transform our healthcare system? Probably not, but many of his other policies are obtainable and I know he would continue to push policies that would help the middle class and poor.

Let's also not forget he is currently beating Trump and any other republican by a large margin in hypothetical matchups of the general population.

Right, right up to the point where congress tells him to shove it.

 

[Billy000]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

Bernie Sanders has about as much chance of becoming President as I do - NONE.

I think if people judge him on his core values, he has the chance of winning in 2016.

If as president could he transform our healthcare system? Probably not, but many of his other policies are obtainable and I know he would continue to push policies that would help the middle class and poor.

Let's also not forget he is currently beating Trump and any other republican by a large margin in hypothetical matchups of the general population.

Right, right up to the point where congress tells him to shove it.

Yeah I'm sure they would be much more receptive to Cruz's plan to raise taxes on the middle class.

 

[Interpol]

No, Bernie is not "too extreme". His positions on practically everything are where mainstream Americans stand.

We don't want boots on the ground in the Middle East, neither does Bernie.

We insist on having more Muslim nations participate with boots on the ground in their own neighborhood, and so does Bernie.

Even a majority of Republican voters want Medicare and Social Security strengthened, not weakened, and so does Bernie.

Young people want more affordable college tuition, so does Bernie.

The country elected Barack Obama to two resounding victories partly because they wanted a public option, not forced private insurance purchases, and that's where Bernie stands, too.

Even on the right, people wanted some of those big banks to be allowed to fail, to be broken up, and for some Wall Streeters to be thrown in jail, which is exactly where Bernie stands.

A majority of even Republican voters think the rich should be paying more fair tax rates, and that's where Bernie stands.

Some folks can bandy about the word "radical" all they want, but there's absolutely nothing particularly radical about Bernie Sanders' overall position that our government belongs to WE THE PEOPLE, not billionaire multi-national corporations. Even many Republicans have this position, which is why Bernie did so well with independent voters in Iowa.

When you throw "radical" at somebody and then people hear him out and realize he's right on a whole grocery list of issues, it just makes the people calling him names look stupid, and only empowers Bernie Sanders, who is actually a totally reasonable person and candidate for the office of the presidency.

There isn't one other candidate who I feel has the back of average, hard-working people, no matter what their political ideology might be.

 

[OKTexas]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

Bernie Sanders has about as much chance of becoming President as I do - NONE.

I think if people judge him on his core values, he has the chance of winning in 2016.

If as president could he transform our healthcare system? Probably not, but many of his other policies are obtainable and I know he would continue to push policies that would help the middle class and poor.

Let's also not forget he is currently beating Trump and any other republican by a large margin in hypothetical matchups of the general population.

Right, right up to the point where congress tells him to shove it.

Yeah I'm sure they would be much more receptive to Cruz's plan to raise taxes on the middle class.

Deflection noted, I'm not going to help you derail the thread. If you want to talk about Cruz policies, start a new thread.

 

[Rustic]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

Blind leading the blind

 

[Mac1958]

Jumping up & down and pointing at Sanders and screaming "socialist!" isn't nearly as effective a tactic any more, especially when so many Republicans seem to attack any government involvement in anything as "socialist". They've jumped the shark and now they're getting bitten by it. Most Americans don't look at any given government program as "socialism".

I doubt Sanders could win the general, but as always, that depends on who he's running against. If it's Trump or Cruz, he has a better chance.

Rather than screaming "socialist", it sure would be nice to see the Republicans calmly and intelligently provide better alternatives and explanations. Calm and intelligence are good.
.

 

[Rustic]

The old nutsack that is Bernese who's policy's will only make sense to a tiny group of pie in the sky delusional progressives, there is no money to pay for the pie in the sky.
Lol

 

[Political Junky]

The old nutsack that is Bernese who's policy's will only make sense to a tiny group of pie in the sky delusional progressives, there is no money to pay for the pie in the sky.
Lol

Germany and Canada do it and they're ranked #1 & #2 nations in the world.

 

[Billy000]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

Bernie Sanders has about as much chance of becoming President as I do - NONE.

I think if people judge him on his core values, he has the chance of winning in 2016.

If as president could he transform our healthcare system? Probably not, but many of his other policies are obtainable and I know he would continue to push policies that would help the middle class and poor.

Let's also not forget he is currently beating Trump and any other republican by a large margin in hypothetical matchups of the general population.

Right, right up to the point where congress tells him to shove it.

Yeah I'm sure they would be much more receptive to Cruz's plan to raise taxes on the middle class.

Deflection noted, I'm not going to help you derail the thread. If you want to talk about Cruz policies, start a new thread.

The point is any presidential candidate faces opposition in congress.

 

[OKTexas]

Bernie Sanders has about as much chance of becoming President as I do - NONE.

I think if people judge him on his core values, he has the chance of winning in 2016.

If as president could he transform our healthcare system? Probably not, but many of his other policies are obtainable and I know he would continue to push policies that would help the middle class and poor.

Let's also not forget he is currently beating Trump and any other republican by a large margin in hypothetical matchups of the general population.

Right, right up to the point where congress tells him to shove it.

Yeah I'm sure they would be much more receptive to Cruz's plan to raise taxes on the middle class.

Deflection noted, I'm not going to help you derail the thread. If you want to talk about Cruz policies, start a new thread.

The point is any presidential candidate faces opposition in congress.

And my point is without a major change in the make up of congress, Bernies pipe dreams have zero chance of becoming reality.

 

[dannyboys]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

HEY Pocahontas! How about you have the class to use quotation marks when you C&P someone else's OP?????
Or do you know what the word 'class' means?

 

[dannyboys]

Take a close look at the issues on Bernie's web site and his plans to address them. Most are merely platitudes but many are only things he could do if he had dictatorial powers with a lot of backup. Both of which he or any president will never have.

The number of naïve rubes and kids he's gathering is both hilarious and scary at the same time.

-----------------------------------------

Remember Jane Fonda born with a fucking CAPITALIST! silver spoon in her mouth and the fucking traitor John Kerry sending out 'dog whistles' supporting the communists in N. V.?
All the fucking idiot hippies wearing Chairman Mao hats?
It's hilarious! These fucking hippies had kids who realised their parents were fucking losers. These kids earned 'real educations' and helped themselves and America prosper. THEIR kids are now the supporters of the Marxist Bernie Sanders. Go fucking figure.

 

[dannyboys]

Personally, I don't believe America is quite ready for his socialist utopia. Even if he would win the Democratic Primary and swing more moderate - he would lose many of his young supporters. I would guess that Republicans are salivating at the thought of facing Sanders in the General Election.

Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

The blunt truth: I just can’t see Bernie Sanders winning a general election. Three months ago, I thought it might be possible, maybe. But watching the campaign unfold as it has, and given some time to ponder how circumstances might play themselves out, I’ve become less convinced that he could beat any of the Republicans. He’d probably have the best shot against Ted Cruz. But in that case, as we now know, Mike Bloomberg would get in, and I think he’d be formidable, but I don’t want to get into why here. That’s another column, if indeed it ever needs to be written.

This column is about Sanders’s chances, which I think are virtually nil for two reasons.

Reason one: He’s not an enrolled Democrat. Understand that I say this not as a judgment on him, but as a description of what would surely become, were he the nominee, a deep, practical liability. Let me explain.

Now, the second reason. I think Sanders is uniquely vulnerable to scorching foreign-policy attacks.

My feeling that Sanders could win a general election was never strong, based on the usual stuff, i.e., 74-year-old socialist from Vermont. But recently I’ve been reflecting on these two matters, his lack of affiliation with the party whose standard he wants to bear, and his unique vulnerability to attack on foreign policy at a time when those issues are much more in the forefront of voters’ minds than usual. As I’ve written before, current general election head-to-head polling is meaningless, since conservatives haven’t yet spent a dollar attacking him. If he’s the nominee, they’re going to spend at least five hundred million of them doing that. And some Democrats, more likely a lot of Democrats, are going to run away from him. I can’t see how that ends well.

More: Bernie Sanders Isn’t Electable, and Here’s Why

It's not his extremism that bothers me ...it's his stupid solutions to our pressing problems.

He thinks pixie dust is going to pay for all his free shit

Nope.

The old nutsack that is Bernese who's policy's will only make sense to a tiny group of pie in the sky delusional progressives, there is no money to pay for the pie in the sky.
Lol

Germany and Canada do it and they're ranked #1 & #2 nations in the world.

Germany and Canada provides free college and university education for everyone?
Germany and Canada provides free healthcare for everyone? Dear God you really are a fucking idiot!
'Free' Health Care in Canada Costs More Than It's Worth