Human beings are equally entitled to the protections of law. You seem to be intentionally confused about when a fetus becomes a human in the eyes of the law. It's birth, not conception.Why not let them kill already born children with Downs or other 'defects too?
Some families have the means to care for and support children with birth defects. Most poor families do not. That's what "pro-choice" means. The family chooses whether or not to bring a baby into the world. Not you, not the state, only the people who must provide for or care for these children.
Again, (using YOUR justifications) why can't we use the same justification to kill handicapped children in the minutes, hours, days or weeks AFTER they are born?
By your reasoning, shouldn't we apply the death penalty to drivers with a taillight out?
My logic is that all human beings are equally entitled to the protections of our laws, regardless of whether they are wanted, sick or even capable of breathing on their own. . .
You seem to be intentionally confused about my "logic"
If a HUMAN BEING IN THE FETAL STAGE OF LIFE is NOT a HUMAN being. . . Do tell us all just what the fuck kind of BEING it is. . . Inquiring minds want to know.
Also, give us a link to the scientific resources you are using to support your claim that we HUMAN BEINGS reproduce by way of complete metamorphosis like frogs and butterflies do.
Last edited: