Palin: Share The Wealth

This thread is perfect for an undecided voter to read to help them make a decision about who to vote for.

We have two situations:

Situation A: The people of Alaska "share the wealth" of that State's natural resources equally and consider the State's natural resources the people's, not the government's.

Situation B: A tax filer making over a certain income (as determined by the Federal government) has their taxes increased so a check can be sent to a tax filer who pays zero Federal Tax thus "spreading the wealth".

McCain supporters agree with "A" and oppose "B".

Obama supporters agree with "B" and don't see the difference between "A" and "B".



Wow, can you say full of shit?
 
except, it wasnt used by the state, it was given equally to ALL Alaskans
reguardless of their incomes

Oh my, that's an excellent point and the socialists no matter how they spin their myopic definition of socialism will never understand the idiocy of calling Sarah Palin a socialist.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, they turn a blind eye to coercive redistribution of wealth via taxation...... *crickets*
 
Last edited:
Seems the Libs would only be happy if:

A. The oil companies got to keep all the money

or

B. The State of Alaska taxed the oil companies and gave to Alaskans who pay no taxes.

or

C. There was no oil drilling at all!

No wonder there are so many Libs in New York City: They get to pay taxes to the the City of NY, State of NY and the Federal government!
 
Seems the Libs would only be happy if:

A. The oil companies got to keep all the money

Only if they agree to pay off elected officials, it's the corruption donchaknow.


B. The State of Alaska taxed the oil companies and gave to Alaskans who pay no taxes.

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need (or needs).... Hmmm, I think I have heard that somewhere.

There was no oil drilling at all!

Now you're talking!

Good points paperboy, all of them. :clap2:
 
should we once again be amused by the backpeddling?

Palin governs and supports socialist ideals within her own state, giving the people of alaska money they didn't EARN and yet here she is saying Obama is a socialist because he wants to raise taxes by 3% on the wealthiest 1% of America?!

:lol:

Ever notice that every argument that mcCain/Palin make against Obama can be applied to themselves? now that's funny stuff
 
Seems the Libs would only be happy if:

A. The oil companies got to keep all the money

or

B. The State of Alaska taxed the oil companies and gave ONLY to Alaskans who pay no taxes.

or

C. There was no oil drilling at all!

No wonder there are so many Libs in New York City: They get to pay taxes to the the City of NY, State of NY and the Federal government!
one small fix

:D
 
should we once again be amused by the backpeddling?

Palin governs and supports socialist ideals within her own state, giving the people of alaska money they didn't EARN and yet here she is saying Obama is a socialist because he wants to raise taxes by 3% on the wealthiest 1% of America?!

:lol:

Ever notice that every argument that mcCain/Palin make against Obama can be applied to themselves? now that's funny stuff

i'm pretty sure sarah palin didn't write the alaska state constitution.
obeying the law is something i find refreshing in a politician.
 
nah...no chains. wouldn't matter... the "base" would just think she's like joan of arc being sacrificed for her cause.

i'll be honest, i have absolutely no problem with what she did in the case of that trooper; i'd have probably done the same thing.

it'd be wrong, of course, but if somebody threatened to shoot a family member of mine, i'd be prone to overreacting i think.
 
i'll be honest, i have absolutely no problem with what she did in the case of that trooper; i'd have probably done the same thing.

it'd be wrong, of course, but if somebody threatened to shoot a family member of mine, i'd be prone to overreacting i think.
actually, i'd like to think you would have done more in that case

wooten doesnt belong in law enforcement
 
i'll be honest, i have absolutely no problem with what she did in the case of that trooper; i'd have probably done the same thing.

it'd be wrong, of course, but if somebody threatened to shoot a family member of mine, i'd be prone to overreacting i think.

A judge ordered her three times to stop hounding her brother in law. You can act how you wish as a private citizen, but not as governor. Sarah seems to have a problem with being told "no". It doesn't resonate for her as McCain's people have found out, too.
 
A judge ordered her three times to stop hounding her brother in law. You can act how you wish as a private citizen, but not as governor. Sarah seems to have a problem with being told "no". It doesn't resonate for her as McCain's people have found out, too.

actually he told her to stop "disparaging" him. i guess you can try to make the case that trying to get him fired is disparagement, but i think the judge was more concerned with the kid's mom and her relatives going on and on with what a scumbag the guy is in front of the kid.

which he is, but i agree with the judge that it's not right to go on about it in front of the kid.
 
dishonest reporting, the judge didnt order Palin to do anything, that was to her sister, to not disparage him in front of his kids
and warned to stop disparaging him

Judge Warned Palin About Disparaging State Trooper -- Political Wire

I can't find the third one right now.
and that one is the exact same thing
so, either you are lying, or your just too fucking stupid to read what the story actually says and went on the dishonest title
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top