Biden Bribery Breadcrumbs Leave Only One Possible Conclusion: Deep-State Partisans Buried The Evidence

[meaner gene]

McConnell a deep state DC shill, shocker.

Actually it's to show the reflexive reaction to anybody who stands up to Trump.

 

[candycorn]

The ironic part is that one of the first people to call for the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump for January 6th, was Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell.

I didn’t know that.

 

[meaner gene]

I didn’t know that.

McConnell had to convince the republicans in the senate, not to convict Trump of the insurrection they personally witnessed. McCarthy needed to pull a rabbit out of the hat, why Trump should avoid conviction.

And that rabbit was that they didn't need to convict Trump. That Trump could/would face criminal and civil charges.

 

[Rawley]

actually, there us another conclusion, maybe there is no evidence biden could be as innocent as trump himself and we would never know it!

of course, if there is evidence or if the whistleblower shows up and speaks truth i might believe this shit, until then, this is just more "bengazi"

Really? The $20,000,000 that they have already traced to the Bidens when Hunter was in the depths of his crack addition doesn't give you any pause?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If you can show that it was earned criminally, sure thing. Go for it.

 

[meaner gene]

Really? The $20,000,000 that they have already traced to the Bidens when Hunter was in the depths of his crack addition doesn't give you any pause?

Not until even a penny of that money is shown to have gone to Joe Biden.

 

[Rawley]

Not until even a penny of that money is shown to have gone to Joe Biden.

And it never has to be shown that a penny did, for him to be guilty of bribery. But even someone as ignorant of the law as you Ratty understands that.

 

[mamooth]

And it never has to be shown that a penny did, for him to be guilty of bribery. But even someone as ignorant of the law as you Ratty understands that.

Well, you'd have to show he took any money.

And you have no evidence for that. Your masters made a story up, and you fell for it.

Like most Trump cultists, you can't grasp that "There is evidence" and "Someone told me there is evidence" are not the same thing.

 

[Rawley]

Well, you'd have to show he took any money.

Nope. Don't have to show he took a dime.

18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses

www.law.cornell.edu

And you have no evidence for that. Your masters made a story up, and you fell for it.
Like most Trump cultists, you can't grasp that "There is evidence" and "Someone told me there is evidence" are not the same thing.

LOL You gotta go back and ask to for some different talking point. Chanting NO EVIDENCE while the evidence is piling higher than a elephant's eye is only making you Bidenfluffers look like stooges.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If you can show that it was earned criminally, sure thing. Go for it.

 

[rampart]

Really? The $20,000,000 that they have already traced to the Bidens when Hunter was in the depths of his crack addition doesn't give you any pause?

if that money is crooked, why haven't charges been filed? i really do not care about these people,

if hunter, or joe is given a fair trial and executed or sent to quantanamo or whatever, ms harrus will be a great president.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If the evidence warrants indictments, good.

So far, it appears they have not.

The GOP has to do much better than this.

“When you have a political party that embraces the subordination of women, the subordination of people of color, the subordination of gender non-conforming people, and the subordination of non-Christians, then it’s not a party that embraces democracy. It’s a party that is looking for a fascist leader and is going to find one.” - Dr. Judith Herman

 

[Rawley]

if that money is crooked, why haven't charges been filed? i really do not care about these people,

Because the DOJ is on the tank for the Bidens.

if hunter, or joe is given a fair trial and executed or sent to quantanamo or whatever, ms harrus will be a great president.

Put down the bong.

 

[Rawley]

If the evidence warrants indictments, good.

So far, it appears they have not.

The GOP has to do much better than this.

“When you have a political party that embraces the subordination of women, the subordination of people of color, the subordination of gender non-conforming people, and the subordination of non-Christians, then it’s not a party that embraces democracy. It’s a party that is looking for a fascist leader and is going to find one.” - Dr. Judith Herman

LOL

You keep worrying about all the "gender non-conforming people." We'll take care of Biden.

 

[Dragonlady]

Biden Bribery Breadcrumbs Leave Only One Possible Conclusion: ​

Deep-State Partisans Buried The Evidence​

Who buried the Biden bribery scandal?
Mounting evidence of deep-state corruption and cover-ups demands an answer.​

Who Buried The Biden Bribery Scandal?

The Biden bribery breadcrumbs leave only one possible conclusion: Corrupt deep-state partisans buried the evidence.

thefederalist.com

6 Sep 2023 ~~ By Margot Cleveland

The Federalist’s blockbuster exclusive on Tuesday revealed U.S. Attorney David Weiss was spoonfed The New York Times’ false narrative that the Pittsburgh U.S. attorney had pushed the Delaware office to investigate Rudy Giuliani’s claims of Biden family corruption. That revelation adds new texture to the IRS whistleblowers’ earlier testimony. More importantly, it suggests a select few DOJ and FBI agents buried the FD-1023 sent to Delaware for further investigation — a report memorializing a “highly credible” FBI confidential human source’s claims that Burisma paid $5 million bribes each to Hunter and Joe Biden.
On Dec. 11, 2020, The New York Times ran an article titled, “Material from Giuliani Spurred a Separate Justice Depart. Pursuit of Hunter Biden.” As I previously detailed, the Times’ reporting was “replete with falsehoods and deceptive narratives,” and sought to paint the “then-U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Scott Brady, whom Barr had tasked with screening any new material related to Ukraine,” as a partisan hack out to get the Bidens. The article falsely represented Brady as pushing the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office to investigate the Bidens based on material provided by Rudy Giuliani.
However, as a whistleblower would later confide in Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Pittsburgh U.S. attorney’s office had sought the investigation not of Giuliani material, but of separate intel provided by a longtime and “highly credible” confidential human source (CHS) on which agents briefed the Delaware office.
As Grassley explained in a July 2023 letter to Weiss, “[O]n October 23, 2020, Justice Department and FBI Special Agents from the Pittsburgh Field Office briefed Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf, one of your top prosecutors, and FBI Special Agents from the Baltimore Field Office with respect to the contents of the FBI-generated FD-1023 alleging a criminal bribery scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden.”
Grassley would later release a minimally redacted copy of the FD-1023, which confirmed the information provided to the Delaware office came not from Giuliani, but from the CHS.
An individual familiar with that Oct. 23 meeting previously confirmed to The Federalist that Weiss was not present for it. That detail gained new significance last week when FOIA documents, obtained by the Heritage Foundation following its lawsuit against the DOJ, revealed that one of Weiss’s top assistant U.S. attorneys forwarded him the Times article portraying the Pittsburgh evidence as originating from Giuliani.
~Snip~
So the key question, as Grassley asked Weiss, is when did he first learn of the FD-1023?
Weiss has yet to answer that question. But IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley’s testimony and supplemental affidavit suggest Wolf and the Baltimore agents briefed by Pittsburgh about the FD-1023 buried that evidence.
During Shapley’s testimony to the House Ways and Means Committee, the IRS special agent made no mention of the FD-1023. Later, though, after former Attorney General William Barr confirmed to The Federalist that the FD-1023 had been sent to Delaware for further investigation, Shapley submitted a supplemental affidavit.
With the Times piece purportedly sourced to “five current and former law enforcement officials and others with knowledge of F.B.I. interactions with the Justice Department,” unless someone told Weiss about the FD-1023 or its contents, Weiss would have had no basis to know the Pittsburgh office had given the Delaware office independent evidence of Biden family corruption. And this was evidence that had already been partially corroborated, as the Pennsylvania-based agents detailed in the briefing on Oct. 23, 2020.
~Snip~
This again raises the question: Who knew of the FD-1023, and when did Weiss learn of its existence?
From Grassley’s whistleblower, it appears Wolf included at least two Baltimore field office agents in the brief. However, from Shapley’s testimony, it appears the Baltimore field agents Wolf allowed to participate in the briefing were not the ones working Hunter’s case — which makes no sense.
That is, unless you are trying to bury the evidence.
So the key question, as Grassley asked Weiss, is when did he first learn of the FD-1023?




Commentary:
Who buried the Biden Bribery Scandal?
Such a mystery, if only we had a clue, just one little bitty clue...
It’s like the guy looking for his dime under a street lamp..
I asked him ..”where did you drop it?”... he said” down the street near that tree.”
I asked “then why you looking for it here?” He said, ”there’s more light”, just can’t seem to find a clue anywhere....
We have paper trails of Biden treason, bribery and quid pro quo, witnesses, and an exorbitant tax debt after just 2 short years of Lesko Brandon. If Trump wins next term will anything of happened to any of the criminals being uncovered now? What about doin anything about the folks that lied, obfuscated, financed, made excuses for, covered up or hid anything illegal that helped the criminals we are finding about now to do what they have done?
Deep-State partisans cannot and won’t walk free very long to many spot lights on them and a lot of public anger will keep the heat on the hacks re-election it’s all they have going for them.
To many records have been kept.

Another phoney bribery story with NO EVIDENCE OF ANY WRONGDOING.

 

[Dragonlady]

LOL

You keep worrying about all the "gender non-conforming people." We'll take care of Biden.

Take care of???? Republicans can't take care of anything. They can't even rid their party of the albatross that is Donald Trump, and it's not for lack of trying.

Mitch McConnell has even begged the Democrats to indict him so Republicans are rid of Trump. Republicans want him gone, but they don't have the balls to disavow him.

 

[rampart]

Because the DOJ is on the tank for the Bidens.

Put down the bong.

are they? trump appointed their director. that makes him one of the "best people."

 

[meaner gene]

And it never has to be shown that a penny did, for him to be guilty of bribery. But even someone as ignorant of the law as you Ratty understands that.

Yes, bribery the primary can direct the bribe or benefit go to third parties, but that requires the person accused of bribery to direct the payment or benefit to a third party. In this case Hunter is both the primary and the beneficiary. Which leaves Joe out of the equation unless you can show Joe received the 10% Hunter charged.
And so far, nobody, not even Comer has shown that.

 

[Rawley]

Yes, bribery the primary can direct the bribe or benefit go to third parties, but that requires the person accused of bribery to direct the payment or benefit to a third party. In this case Hunter is both the primary and the beneficiary. Which leaves Joe out of the equation unless you can show Joe received the 10% Hunter charged.

Nope. I'd tell to read the law, but that would be like asking my schnauzer to drive me to Ralphs.

 

[Rawley]

are they? trump appointed their director. that makes him one of the "best people."

Head of the DOJ is the Attorney General and he did not appoint Garland.