Palestine Today

[P F Tinmore]

Israeli soldiers attack Palestinian citizens as they protest land theft for settlement construction in Surif town near the West Bank City of Al-Khalil.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Mohammed and Marwa got married only a few weeks before the Israeli aggression on Gaza last week. An Israeli rocket turned the house of the newlyweds into wreckage.

 

[rylah]

Israeli soldiers attack Palestinian citizens as they protest land theft for settlement construction in Surif town near the West Bank City of Al-Khalil.

So how many Jews are now living in Surif?
I'd like to visit...but we both know this is just bs propaganda.

 

[rylah]

Mohammed and Marwa got married only a few weeks before the Israeli aggression on Gaza last week. An Israeli rocket turned the house of the newlyweds into wreckage.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: WPalestine Todayho Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another one of those pictures that has no specifics context or association to a specific event.

Israeli soldiers attack Palestinian citizens as they protest land theft for settlement construction in Surif town near the West Bank City of Al-Khalil.

(COMMENT)

You cannot trust this commentary from "P F Tinmore."

These are Police Officers, NOT Israeli Soldiers. It is damn hard to tell what is going on here.

You can study this picture all you want.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: WPalestine Todayho Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another one of those pictures that has no specifics context or association to a specific event.

Israeli soldiers attack Palestinian citizens as they protest land theft for settlement construction in Surif town near the West Bank City of Al-Khalil.
View attachment 295296

(COMMENT)

You cannot trust this commentary from "P F Tinmore."

These are Police Officers, NOT Israeli Soldiers. It is damn hard to tell what is going on here.

You can study this picture all you want.


Most Respectfully,
R

These are Police Officers, NOT Israeli Soldiers.

Same shit, different platter.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,Police vs Soldier - What's the difference?

Oh man! You are confused. Your hatred runs so very deep, that you no longer understand "who is who → or → what is what."

• Police vs Soldier - What's the difference? •
The police force, like the military is part of the coercive state. Both of them are uniformed, disciplined and armed bodies; yet they are different in many ways.

1. In the first place, military is called into action rarely only at times of war, emergency or natural disaster; the police force has a day to day involvement in public life. Thus the police is more closer and integrated in the social life, than is the military, which remains alienated.

2. Police are usually unarmed or their arms are primarily for self-defences while military uses arms for defending the country.​

The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.
SOURCE: • ICRC Customary and International Humanitarian Law •

[/indent]

These are Police Officers, NOT Israeli Soldiers.

Same shit, different platter.

(COMMENT)

Hatred is an emotion, outside the Rule of Law (RoL). Reason is a justification for productive action. In this case, you simply have difficulty understanding the language used in the agreement which outlines the civil and security control exercised by the Israelis within Area "C" - and - separating the emotional acts which are prejudicial public order and safety from that which is established under the RoL.

(REMEMBER)

The RoL is ofter disposed of in cases of Arab Palestinian activist movements in which armed struggle has been predetermined to be the only way to liberate Palestine. This basic activist stance is political and spawns civil confrontation with authority as a strategy. The strategy is activism to establish public awareness and garner public sympathy from outside the framework of which comes from societal norms for public order.

The Police operates to give the society from activities outside the norms.

The Soldiers operates to further diplomacy by other means.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[USAF 2023]

Israeli soldiers attack Palestinian citizens as they protest land theft for settlement construction in Surif town near the West Bank City of Al-Khalil.

Thread? No content; What a surprise!

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,Police vs Soldier - What's the difference?

Oh man! You are confused. Your hatred runs so very deep, that you no longer understand "who is who → or → what is what."

• Police vs Soldier - What's the difference? •
The police force, like the military is part of the coercive state. Both of them are uniformed, disciplined and armed bodies; yet they are different in many ways.

1. In the first place, military is called into action rarely only at times of war, emergency or natural disaster; the police force has a day to day involvement in public life. Thus the police is more closer and integrated in the social life, than is the military, which remains alienated.

2. Police are usually unarmed or their arms are primarily for self-defences while military uses arms for defending the country.​

The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.
SOURCE: • ICRC Customary and International Humanitarian Law •

[/indent]

These are Police Officers, NOT Israeli Soldiers.

Same shit, different platter.

(COMMENT)

Hatred is an emotion, outside the Rule of Law (RoL). Reason is a justification for productive action. In this case, you simply have difficulty understanding the language used in the agreement which outlines the civil and security control exercised by the Israelis within Area "C" - and - separating the emotional acts which are prejudicial public order and safety from that which is established under the RoL.

(REMEMBER)

The RoL is ofter disposed of in cases of Arab Palestinian activist movements in which armed struggle has been predetermined to be the only way to liberate Palestine. This basic activist stance is political and spawns civil confrontation with authority as a strategy. The strategy is activism to establish public awareness and garner public sympathy from outside the framework of which comes from societal norms for public order.

The Police operates to give the society from activities outside the norms.

The Soldiers operates to further diplomacy by other means.


Most Respectfully,
R

From the Palestinian's perspective (the wrong end of a gun) is there any substantial difference.

Seems like an overkill for dealing with an unarmed civilian population.

 

[rylah]

Seems like an overkill for dealing with an unarmed civilian population.

What a silly sound byte.
Let me ask you, do you imagine all the "honor" killings and unending family disputes cause deaths with sticks and shovels?

Unarmed civilian population:

Here's another one for some context from Al- Monitor:

Palestinians up in arms over weapons proliferation
The PA is criticized for failing to end the spread of weapons among citizens in the West Bank, where family disputes often end tragically.

So much for your "unarmed population" sound byte.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

 

[rylah]

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

So in response to Israel's surgical assassination of their military commander,
they respond shooting indiscriminately on civilian population - they're lowlife cowards.

Also notice how all their rockets are placed in residential areas.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

So in response to Israel's surgical assassination of their military commander,
they respond shooting indiscriminately on civilian population - they're lowlife cowards.

Also notice how all their rockets are placed in residential areas.

A clear demonstration that the withdrawal from Gaza was a mistake.

 

[USAF 2023]

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

So in response to Israel's surgical assassination of their military commander,
they respond shooting indiscriminately on civilian population - they're lowlife cowards.

Also notice how all their rockets are placed in residential areas.

A clear demonstration that the withdrawal from Gaza was a mistake.

Which is why they will never withdraw from the W. Bank or E. Jerusalem

 

[rylah]

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

So in response to Israel's surgical assassination of their military commander,
they respond shooting indiscriminately on civilian population - they're lowlife cowards.

Also notice how all their rockets are placed in residential areas.

A clear demonstration that the withdrawal from Gaza was a mistake.

Which is why they will never withdraw from the W. Bank or E. Jerusalem

Yes, and just to think that the person who did it, when was a commander in the army,
on his own initiative against the orders from the govt, conquered the entire Sinai peninsula.

"What You see from there, is not what You see from here"...as he explained once quoting a verse from a song.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I'll say this just once!

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

(COMMENT)

Any day is a good day to kill a terrorist.

The Arab Palestinians have no special dispensation to conduct acts of terrorism.

Do you think that any of the North African and Middle East nations [like al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)] want to declare any armed group in their territory that presents themselves as fighting for independence and self-determination to be legal?

Do you think that:

◈ The UK wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Real Irish Republican Army:
  
• Orange Volunteers:
  
• Real Ulster Freedom Fighters:

◈ The Turish Republic wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Kurdistan Communities Union
• Kurdistan Freedom Hawks

◈ The Thailand wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Barisan Revolusi Nasional
• Gerakan Mujahidin Islam Patani
• Islamic Liberation Front of Patani

◈ The Russian Fededration wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Caucasus Emirate

• Kataib al-Khoul
• Arab Mujahideen in Chechnya
• Riyad-us Saliheen Brigade of Martyrs

• Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Caucasus Province

◈ India wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Communist Party of India
  
• Harkat-ul-Mujahideen
• Hizbul Mujahideen
• Indian Mujahideen
• Khalistan Commando Force
• Khalistan Zindabad Force
• Lashkar-e-Taiba
• Maoist Communist Party of Manipur
• United Jihad Council
  
• United Liberation Front of Assam

◈ France wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Comité Régional d'Action Viticole
  
• National Liberation Front of Corsica

◈ Egypt wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Al Furqan Brigades
• Al-Qaeda in Sinai Peninsula
• Ansar al-Sharia
• Egyptian Islamic Jihad
• The Hasm Movement
• Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
• Soldiers of Egypt

◈ Columbia wants to say the following are legitimate?

• The Black Eagles
  
• Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia
  
• Indigenous Revolutionary Armed Forces of the Pacific
  
• National Liberation Army
• Popular Liberation Army
  
• Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
• FARC dissidents

I could go on, but I think you see the point. Every one of these entities (and there are many - many more) is no different in the political context that that of the various Arab Palestinian organizations. If the UN declares the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) Movments as Internationally legitimate as an armed liberation organization, then under the "equal under the law" concept, all these are just as legitimate. (That is not going to happen.)

And many of these entities mentioned here are just as diabolical as the HoAP.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[USAF 2023]

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

Israel targets Islamic Jihad leader, sending message to Iran

Your " point?"

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I'll say this just once!

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

(COMMENT)

Any day is a good day to kill a terrorist.

View attachment 295437

The Arab Palestinians have no special dispensation to conduct acts of terrorism.

Do you think that any of the North African and Middle East nations [like al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)] want to declare any armed group in their territory that presents themselves as fighting for independence and self-determination to be legal?

Do you think that:

◈ The UK wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Real Irish Republican Army:
  
• Orange Volunteers:
  
• Real Ulster Freedom Fighters:

◈ The Turish Republic wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Kurdistan Communities Union
• Kurdistan Freedom Hawks

◈ The Thailand wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Barisan Revolusi Nasional
• Gerakan Mujahidin Islam Patani
• Islamic Liberation Front of Patani

◈ The Russian Fededration wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Caucasus Emirate

• Kataib al-Khoul
• Arab Mujahideen in Chechnya
• Riyad-us Saliheen Brigade of Martyrs

• Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Caucasus Province

◈ India wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Communist Party of India
  
• Harkat-ul-Mujahideen
• Hizbul Mujahideen
• Indian Mujahideen
• Khalistan Commando Force
• Khalistan Zindabad Force
• Lashkar-e-Taiba
• Maoist Communist Party of Manipur
• United Jihad Council
  
• United Liberation Front of Assam

◈ France wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Comité Régional d'Action Viticole
  
• National Liberation Front of Corsica

◈ Egypt wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Al Furqan Brigades
• Al-Qaeda in Sinai Peninsula
• Ansar al-Sharia
• Egyptian Islamic Jihad
• The Hasm Movement
• Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
• Soldiers of Egypt

◈ Columbia wants to say the following are legitimate?

• The Black Eagles
  
• Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia
  
• Indigenous Revolutionary Armed Forces of the Pacific
  
• National Liberation Army
• Popular Liberation Army
  
• Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
• FARC dissidents

I could go on, but I think you see the point. Every one of these entities (and there are many - many more) is no different in the political context that that of the various Arab Palestinian organizations. If the UN declares the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) Movments as Internationally legitimate as an armed liberation organization, then under the "equal under the law" concept, all these are just as legitimate. (That is not going to happen.)

And many of these entities mentioned here are just as diabolical as the HoAP.


Most Respectfully,
R

Do you mean that the Palestinians cannot fight for their rights?

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I'll say this just once!

Palestinians fire rockets after Israel assassinates Islamic Jihad commander in Gaza

(COMMENT)

Any day is a good day to kill a terrorist.

View attachment 295437

The Arab Palestinians have no special dispensation to conduct acts of terrorism.

Do you think that any of the North African and Middle East nations [like al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)] want to declare any armed group in their territory that presents themselves as fighting for independence and self-determination to be legal?

Do you think that:

◈ The UK wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Real Irish Republican Army:
  
• Orange Volunteers:
  
• Real Ulster Freedom Fighters:

◈ The Turish Republic wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Kurdistan Communities Union
• Kurdistan Freedom Hawks

◈ The Thailand wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Barisan Revolusi Nasional
• Gerakan Mujahidin Islam Patani
• Islamic Liberation Front of Patani

◈ The Russian Fededration wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Caucasus Emirate

• Kataib al-Khoul
• Arab Mujahideen in Chechnya
• Riyad-us Saliheen Brigade of Martyrs

• Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Caucasus Province

◈ India wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Communist Party of India
  
• Harkat-ul-Mujahideen
• Hizbul Mujahideen
• Indian Mujahideen
• Khalistan Commando Force
• Khalistan Zindabad Force
• Lashkar-e-Taiba
• Maoist Communist Party of Manipur
• United Jihad Council
  
• United Liberation Front of Assam

◈ France wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Comité Régional d'Action Viticole
  
• National Liberation Front of Corsica

◈ Egypt wants to say the following are legitimate?

• Al Furqan Brigades
• Al-Qaeda in Sinai Peninsula
• Ansar al-Sharia
• Egyptian Islamic Jihad
• The Hasm Movement
• Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
• Soldiers of Egypt

◈ Columbia wants to say the following are legitimate?

• The Black Eagles
  
• Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia
  
• Indigenous Revolutionary Armed Forces of the Pacific
  
• National Liberation Army
• Popular Liberation Army
  
• Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
• FARC dissidents

I could go on, but I think you see the point. Every one of these entities (and there are many - many more) is no different in the political context that that of the various Arab Palestinian organizations. If the UN declares the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) Movments as Internationally legitimate as an armed liberation organization, then under the "equal under the law" concept, all these are just as legitimate. (That is not going to happen.)

And many of these entities mentioned here are just as diabolical as the HoAP.


Most Respectfully,
R

Do you mean that the Palestinians cannot fight for their rights?

According to Tinmore, these are their " rights"





GASP !!! Do I see HASIDIC Jews praying at the Western Wall? And these are THEIR RIGHTS

 

[P F Tinmore]