PA on the edge as opposition to talks with apartheid Israel widens

[rhodescholar]

Or maybe "the endless, mindless (Islamic) violence and terrorism is a response to Wall Street speculation in killing people and breaking their shit?

Only a mentally ill retard would think that the taliban and al qaeda exist in any way shape or form due to the West...or the muslim brotherhood, or hezbollah, etc., etc.,

When the taliban destroyed the buddhist statues, was that because of the west also, monkey?

The pakistani madrassas are funded by saudi money whose wahhabist strain preaches hatred - is that due to the west also, monkey?

You're so stupid and clueless, stop buying the ron paul BS and use your tiny brain to think, monkey...

 

[rhodescholar]

Inheritance is not mentioned in your link.

Guess you got caught in yet another lie, idiot moron

 

[P F Tinmore]

Inheritance is not mentioned in your link.

Guess you got caught in yet another lie, idiot moron

What lie? Name one place where people cannot inherit property from their parents.

 

[rhodescholar]

What lie? Name one place where people cannot inherit property from their parents.

Mentally sick moron, where does the official UN definition of a refugee state anything about inherited property?

IT DOESN'T, FUCKING IDIOT.

Then you lied again, claiming that the pal arabs did not have "special rights," which I clearly proved was a lie:

""The major exception is the 4,600,000 Palestinian refugees under the authority of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), who are the only group to be granted refugee status to the descendants of refugees according to the above definition.[3]"

------------------------------

So that is TWO lies you were caught making...how much of a fucking zero are you now...

 

[P F Tinmore]

What lie? Name one place where people cannot inherit property from their parents.

Mentally sick moron, where does the official UN definition of a refugee state anything about inherited property?

IT DOESN'T, FUCKING IDIOT.

Then you lied again, claiming that the pal arabs did not have "special rights," which I clearly proved was a lie:

""The major exception is the 4,600,000 Palestinian refugees under the authority of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), who are the only group to be granted refugee status to the descendants of refugees according to the above definition.[3]"

------------------------------

So that is TWO lies you were caught making...how much of a fucking zero are you now...

That's right. They did not negate this natural right.

 

[The Infidel]

 

[rhodescholar]

That's right. They did not negate this natural right.

Tell us idiot asshole, where the "right" was granted in the first place by the UN official definition, ****?

Try again, scumbag...

 

[P F Tinmore]

That's right. They did not negate this natural right.

Tell us idiot asshole, where the "right" was granted in the first place by the UN official definition, ****?

Try again, scumbag...

They are Palestinians. The land is in Palestine. Inheritance would be by Palestinian law. What would the UN have to do with it?

 

[GHook93]

The important part of the article is the Palestinians are getting tired of Abbas and his gang. Abbas has already been kicked out of Gaza and his popularity is taking a dive in the West Bank. His policies are those of Israel and the US and those policies are a detriment to the rights of the Palestinians. There is a growing call for his removal.

Abbas is an important part of the occupation. The US has given him hundreds of millions in money, training, and weapons for the purpose of working in coordination with Israeli forces. If, probably when, Abbas is removed all that will be turned loose in Palestine, free for the taking.

Fine if you want war, then don't cry when there are more and wide spread Cast Leads. Don't when the blockade on Gaza gets more intense. Don't cry when Jews fight back!

 

[GHook93]

Facts are stubborn things...

"The fact that the Israel-Palestine conflict grinds on without resolution might appear to be rather strange. For many of the world's conflicts, it is difficult even to conjure up a feasible settlement. In this case, it is not only possible, but there is near universal agreement on its basic contours: a two-state settlement along the internationally recognized (pre-June 1967) borders -- with "minor and mutual modifications," to adopt official U.S. terminology before Washington departed from the international community in the mid-1970s.

"The basic principles have been accepted by virtually the entire world, including the Arab states (who go on to call for full normalization of relations), the Organization of Islamic States (including Iran), and relevant non-state actors (including Hamas). A settlement along these lines was first proposed at the U.N. Security Council in January 1976 by the major Arab states. Israel refused to attend the session. The U.S. vetoed the resolution, and did so again in 1980. The record at the General Assembly since is similar.

"There was one important and revealing break in U.S.-Israeli rejectionism. After the failed Camp David agreements in 2000, President Clinton recognized that the terms he and Israel had proposed were unacceptable to any Palestinians. That December, he proposed his "parameters": imprecise, but more forthcoming. He then stated that both sides had accepted the parameters, while expressing reservations."

If you became convinced the above quote was historically accurate, would that change your opinion regarding which side in this conflict truly wants peace?

A Middle East Peace...

This is revisionist history! I love how they state Iran accepted Israel in the 70s, yes Douche Bag because the Shah was in power in Iran at the time. Iran was an allie of Israel in the 50s-70s you stupid fuck.

The Arabs have always called for millions of enemies of the State being relocated to Israel. That would be unacceptable to anyone. The Camp David Accords were unacceptable! Laughable, It stated with an offer of 95% of what the Arabs requested and was bumped up to 98%! Absolutely revisionist history. Cumpsky is making it like the Arabs have been cool with an Israeli state from the 70s. Laughable the fact that he states Israel wouldn't attend the meeting. LIAR, Israel is never allowed to attend the meetings, Israel has requested for years to have a representative attend the Arab League Conference and they are always denied!

 

[Shogun]

The important part of the article is the Palestinians are getting tired of Abbas and his gang. Abbas has already been kicked out of Gaza and his popularity is taking a dive in the West Bank. His policies are those of Israel and the US and those policies are a detriment to the rights of the Palestinians. There is a growing call for his removal.

Abbas is an important part of the occupation. The US has given him hundreds of millions in money, training, and weapons for the purpose of working in coordination with Israeli forces. If, probably when, Abbas is removed all that will be turned loose in Palestine, free for the taking.

Fine if you want war, then don't cry when there are more and wide spread Cast Leads. Don't when the blockade on Gaza gets more intense. Don't cry when Jews fight back!

fair enough... don't cry holocaust when JERUSALEM AND TEL AVIV GET NUKED.

 

[Shogun]

that's right. They did not negate this natural right.

tell us idiot asshole, where the "right" was granted in the first place by the un official definition, ****?

Try again, scumbag...

hey! You big pussy!


Sign up to any forums lately using my nickname?

 

[GHook93]

That's right. They did not negate this natural right.

Tell us idiot asshole, where the "right" was granted in the first place by the UN official definition, ****?

Try again, scumbag...

They are Palestinians. The land is in Palestine. Inheritance would be by Palestinian law. What would the UN have to do with it?

Interesting you will say all this, but when it comes to ethnically cleansing all the Jews from the West Bank, you are all for it. If some one says the Arab Settlements in Israel must be ethnically cleased and those people must be transfered to the West Bank you would call them a racist. But you openly call for a Jew free Palestine. Why shouldn't the settlers be allowed to stay and become Jewish Palestinians? After all most of the settlements have been constructed by Palestinian laborers! The Jewish Palestinian would be subject to Palestinian laws, rights and taxes! They would be Palestinian citizen. A hypocrite like you probably has a 1000s reasons why its different, most lack any creditability or logic. But people like you are natural hypocrites. You demand an ethnically cleased Jew Free Palestine, while SCREAMING for Arab rights in Israel!

 

[georgephillip]

Facts are stubborn things...

"The fact that the Israel-Palestine conflict grinds on without resolution might appear to be rather strange. For many of the world's conflicts, it is difficult even to conjure up a feasible settlement. In this case, it is not only possible, but there is near universal agreement on its basic contours: a two-state settlement along the internationally recognized (pre-June 1967) borders -- with "minor and mutual modifications," to adopt official U.S. terminology before Washington departed from the international community in the mid-1970s.

"The basic principles have been accepted by virtually the entire world, including the Arab states (who go on to call for full normalization of relations), the Organization of Islamic States (including Iran), and relevant non-state actors (including Hamas). A settlement along these lines was first proposed at the U.N. Security Council in January 1976 by the major Arab states. Israel refused to attend the session. The U.S. vetoed the resolution, and did so again in 1980. The record at the General Assembly since is similar.

"There was one important and revealing break in U.S.-Israeli rejectionism. After the failed Camp David agreements in 2000, President Clinton recognized that the terms he and Israel had proposed were unacceptable to any Palestinians. That December, he proposed his "parameters": imprecise, but more forthcoming. He then stated that both sides had accepted the parameters, while expressing reservations."

If you became convinced the above quote was historically accurate, would that change your opinion regarding which side in this conflict truly wants peace?

A Middle East Peace...

This is revisionist history! I love how they state Iran accepted Israel in the 70s, yes Douche Bag because the Shah was in power in Iran at the time. Iran was an allie of Israel in the 50s-70s you stupid fuck.

The Arabs have always called for millions of enemies of the State being relocated to Israel. That would be unacceptable to anyone. The Camp David Accords were unacceptable! Laughable, It stated with an offer of 95% of what the Arabs requested and was bumped up to 98%! Absolutely revisionist history. Cumpsky is making it like the Arabs have been cool with an Israeli state from the 70s. Laughable the fact that he states Israel wouldn't attend the meeting. LIAR, Israel is never allowed to attend the meetings, Israel has requested for years to have a representative attend the Arab League Conference and they are always denied!

Did you even bother to read Chomsky's article?

" A settlement along these lines was first proposed at the U.N. Security Council in January 1976 by the major Arab states. Israel refused to attend the session. The U.S. vetoed the resolution, and did so again in 1980. The record at the General Assembly since is similar."

That would be the UN Security Council session, Einstein.

Elites in the US and Israel are making too much money stealing Arab land,water, and natural gas to have any interest in peace.

"One crucial element of Israel's criminal siege, little reported, is the naval blockade. Peter Beaumont reports from Gaza that, "on its coastal littoral, Gaza's limitations are marked by a different fence where the bars are Israeli gunboats with their huge wakes, scurrying beyond the Palestinian fishing boats and preventing them from going outside a zone imposed by the warships." According to reports from the scene, the naval siege has been tightened steadily since 2000. Fishing boats have been driven steadily out of Gaza's territorial waters and toward the shore by Israeli gunboats, often violently without warning and with many casualties. As a result of these naval actions, Gaza's fishing industry has virtually collapsed; fishing is impossible near shore because of the contamination caused by Israel's regular attacks, including the destruction of power plants and sewage facilities.

These Israeli naval attacks began shortly after the discovery by the BG (British Gas) Group of what appear to be quite sizeable natural gas fields in Gaza's territorial waters. Industry journals report that Israel is already appropriating these Gazan resources for its own use, part of its commitment to shift its economy to natural gas. The standard industry source reports:

"Israel's finance ministry has given the Israel Electric Corp. (IEC) approval to purchase larger quantities of natural gas from BG than originally agreed upon, according to Israeli government sources [which] said the state-owned utility would be able to negotiate for as much as 1.5 billion cubic meters of natural gas from the Marine field located off the Mediterranean coast of the Palestinian controlled Gaza Strip.

"Last year the Israeli government approved the purchase of 800 million cubic meters of gas from the field by the IEC.... Recently the Israeli government changed its policy and decided the state-owned utility could buy the entire quantity of gas from the Gaza Marine field. Previously the government had said the IEC could buy half the total amount and the remainder would be bought by private power producers."

"The pillage of what could become a major source of income for Gaza is surely known to U.S. authorities. It is only reasonable to suppose that the intention to appropriate these limited resources, either by Israel alone or together with the collaborationist Palestinian Authority, is the motive for preventing Gazan fishing boats from entering Gaza's territorial waters."

Revise that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Tell us idiot asshole, where the "right" was granted in the first place by the UN official definition, ****?

Try again, scumbag...

They are Palestinians. The land is in Palestine. Inheritance would be by Palestinian law. What would the UN have to do with it?

Interesting you will say all this, but when it comes to ethnically cleansing all the Jews from the West Bank, you are all for it. If some one says the Arab Settlements in Israel must be ethnically cleased and those people must be transfered to the West Bank you would call them a racist. But you openly call for a Jew free Palestine. Why shouldn't the settlers be allowed to stay and become Jewish Palestinians? After all most of the settlements have been constructed by Palestinian laborers! The Jewish Palestinian would be subject to Palestinian laws, rights and taxes! They would be Palestinian citizen. A hypocrite like you probably has a 1000s reasons why its different, most lack any creditability or logic. But people like you are natural hypocrites. You demand an ethnically cleased Jew Free Palestine, while SCREAMING for Arab rights in Israel!

You must not view my posts. I have never called for the expulsion of Jews nor have I posted any links that promote expulsion.

 

[blu]

ghook is getting desperate lololol

 

[rhodescholar]

The jew haters here are also mentally ill liars.

Some of them claim the pal arabs descendants have a right to move to israel - except most of the arab muslims alive in 1948 are now long dead - and the UN definition of a refugee does not included descendants.

Other mentally ill posters make up nonsense about how israel and the US is taking arab resources, except there has been tens of trillions of dollars paid to the arab muslims by the US, Israel and rest of the West for their oil since the 1900s. This is the LARGEST transfer of wealth in the history of mankind, but when the mentally ill racist trash seize on a lie to try and defend their idiocy, facts mean nothing...

 

[P F Tinmore]

She comes in peace.

Oppress this!!!

 

[hipeter924]

She comes in peace.

Oppress this!!!

 

[P F Tinmore]

She comes in peace.

Oppress this!!!

Good comeback, retard.