OWS protesters branded as terrorists by our lovely government

[Stephanie]

Well, in a way they deserved it..

they terrorized people and their properties..

 

[Connery]

The FBI as with all agencies of this type have a responsibility to investigate all potential threats of this nature. Further, OWS could have been used as a means for violent entities to commit crimes for which OWS may have not been involved with. Smart move on the part of the government.

 

[boedicca]

OWS is a terrorist organization. It isn't a muslim terrorist organization.

OWS is filled with the typical Anarchists who use any pretext to vandalize and loot law-abiding people.

 

[Billo_Really]

The FBI as with all agencies of this type have a responsibility to investigate all potential threats of this nature. Further, OWS could have been used as a means for violent entities to commit crimes for which OWS may have not been involved with. Smart move on the part of the government.

The FBI deliberately put field agents in their crowds to start violence.

You're full of shit and are basically defending the equivalent of the Gestapo.

 

[boedicca]

The FBI as with all agencies of this type have a responsibility to investigate all potential threats of this nature. Further, OWS could have been used as a means for violent entities to commit crimes for which OWS may have not been involved with. Smart move on the part of the government.

The FBI deliberately put field agents in their crowds to start violence.

You're full of shit and are basically defending the equivalent of the Gestapo.

You are incredibly ignorant. The people who started violence are the same Anarchists who infiltrate most protests against western civilization.

 

[Billo_Really]

OWS is filled with the typical Anarchists who use any pretext to vandalize and loot law-abiding people.

Like those kids getting maced?

Sitting in a public space, is vandalism?

 

[Connery]

The FBI as with all agencies of this type have a responsibility to investigate all potential threats of this nature. Further, OWS could have been used as a means for violent entities to commit crimes for which OWS may have not been involved with. Smart move on the part of the government.

The FBI deliberately put field agents in their crowds to start violence.

You're full of shit and are basically defending the equivalent of the Gestapo.

Kindly provide some reference material to support your allegations.

 

[boedicca]

OWS is filled with the typical Anarchists who use any pretext to vandalize and loot law-abiding people.

Like those kids getting maced?

Sitting in a public space, is vandalism?

Read up on how Occupy Oakland (really, Oakland as the epicenter of Wall Street Power - give me a frelling break) vandalized the city.

Occupy Oakland Violence: Peaceful Occupy Protests Degenerate Into Chaos

[ame=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86XhCwHhwn8]Occupy Oakland[/ame]


A simple search will yield a lot of results.

 

[daveman]

The FBI as with all agencies of this type have a responsibility to investigate all potential threats of this nature. Further, OWS could have been used as a means for violent entities to commit crimes for which OWS may have not been involved with. Smart move on the part of the government.

The FBI deliberately put field agents in their crowds to start violence.

You're full of shit and are basically defending the equivalent of the Gestapo.

Kindly provide some reference material to support your allegations.

Degree of difficulty: Use RATIONAL sources, tenderloin. Not your usual prog horseshit.

 

[Billo_Really]

You are incredibly ignorant. The people who started violence are the same Anarchists who infiltrate most protests against western civilization.

I'm ignorant? You make general statements and use innuendo as proof. I can back up what I say with specifics!

Washington, D.C.
On the very first day of the Occupation of Wall Street, we saw infiltration by the police. We were leaving Zucotti Park and were stopped in traffic by the rear of the park. We saw an unmarked van open, in the front seat were two uniformed police and out of the back came two men dressed as occupiers wearing backpacks, sweatshirts, and jeans. They walked into Zucotti Park and became part of the crowd.

In the first week of the Occupation of Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC we saw the impact of two right wing infiltrators. A peaceful protest was planned at the drone exhibit at the Smithsonian Institution. The plan was for a banner drop and a die-in under the drones. But, as protesters arrived at the museum two people ran out in front, threatening the security guards and causing them to pepper spray protesters and tourists. Patrick Howley, an assistant editor for the American Spectator, wrote a column bragging about his role as an agent provocateur. A few days later we uncovered the second infiltrator, Michael Stack, when he was urging people on Freedom Plaza to resist police with force. We later learned he was from the Leadership Institute which trains youth in right wing ideology and tactics. We were told he had also been at Occupy Wall Street provoking violence.

Were "Pat" and "Mike", the "Anarchists" you were referring to?

Oakland, Ca.
There have been a handful of other reports around the country of infiltration. In Oakland, CopWatch filmed an Oakland police officer infiltrating. And, in another video CopWatch includes audio tape of an Oakland police chief, Howard Jordan, talking about how police departments all over the country infiltrate, not just to monitor protesters but to manipulate and direct them.

Was "Howard" the "Anarchist" you were referring to?

Los Angeles, Ca.
There were also reports in Los Angeles of a dozen undercover police in the encampment before they were forcibly evicted by the police. The raid by the LA police was brutal and resulted in mass arrests, with most charges dropped, but with others mistreated in jails. Similar pre-raid undercover activities were reported in Nashville,Tennessee.

There is nothing more patriotic, than exercising ones right to dissent. And there's nothing more anti-American, than criminalizing that right.

 

[Billo_Really]

Degree of difficulty: Use RATIONAL sources, tenderloin. Not your usual prog horseshit.

There are no more credible sources than the people who were there.

See above for the source.

 

[daveman]

There is nothing more patriotic, than exercising ones right to dissent. And there's nothing more anti-American, than criminalizing that right.

[email protected]

AttackWatch!!

 

[daveman]

Degree of difficulty: Use RATIONAL sources, tenderloin. Not your usual prog horseshit.

There are no more credible sources than the people who were there.

See above for the source.

Yes, because they have NO AGENDA at all.

 

[daveman]

That's what happens when radicalized liberals are "elected" to office.

Obama's not a liberal!

He doesn't have liberal policies and there's not a single liberal in his Cabinet!

You're fuckin' nuts! And your lack of outrage on this issue, shows you're also anti-American.

Were you similarly outraged when Christian veteran gun-owning, small-government-supporting conservatives were labeled "potential domestic terrorists" by this Administration?

No?

Then feel free to eat shit.

Hey, Skippy: You deliberately missed this post.

 

[Billo_Really]

Yes, because they have NO AGENDA at all.

That's completely irrelevent to eye-witness testimoney of what went down.

And the police chief that said the same thing? He had an agenda, yet corroborated exactly what the OWS were saying.

 

[boedicca]

[loinboy]OWS protestors are the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human beings I've ever known in my life.[/loinboy]

 

[skookerasbil]

What a genius............anarchists are terrorists you dummy.

 

[Billo_Really]

Were you similarly outraged when Christian veteran gun-owning, small-government-supporting conservatives were labeled "potential domestic terrorists" by this Administration?

No?

Then feel free to eat shit.

It was my understanding, far right, anti-government, militia groups, were the ones being put on the "watch list".

Just because someone ones a gun, doesn't mean they are a potential domestic terrorist.

But people who make statements like, "Maybe next time, we'll come back and solve this problem with our 2nd Amendment rights!"

Now that's a potential terrorist!

 

[daveman]

Yes, because they have NO AGENDA at all.

That's completely irrelevent to eye-witness testimoney of what went down.

And the police chief that said the same thing? He had an agenda, yet corroborated exactly what the OWS were saying.

Didn't I tell you that prog horseshit was not allowed?

 

[daveman]

Were you similarly outraged when Christian veteran gun-owning, small-government-supporting conservatives were labeled "potential domestic terrorists" by this Administration?

No?

Then feel free to eat shit.

It was my understanding, far right, anti-government, militia groups, were the ones being put on the "watch list".

Just because someone ones a gun, doesn't mean they are a potential domestic terrorist.

But people who make statements like, "Maybe next time, we'll come back and solve this problem with our 2nd Amendment rights!"

Now that's a potential terrorist!

Exactly as I suspected.

So eat shit.