NightFox
Wildling
Stop being intellectually dishonest Fox. It's beneath you. The gop was not anti-free trade, immigration and pro deficit until W took down the establishment paving the way for the takeover of Birthirsim.There was no brand of Trumpism until W killed the gop brand. The gop as we knew it since at least Eisenhower is dead, and probably for good at least as a "Republican" brand. It's not an adaptive argument to look at reality. The gop is now a nativisit white nationalism.Nice adaptive argument device you got there. You're argument went from He killed the brand to ; there's two brands and only one of them is one of them is dead.The GOP controls the House because of STATE politics, not the natl gop brand,Er..ummm.. if he killed it, how come the GOP has control of the legislative branch and the executive branch of the federal government, not to mention the majority of governorships and state legislatures? Looks to me like he just put it to sleep long enough for ONimrod to get elected.
Just like everything else Georgy Boy did, he gave it a try but ultimately fucked it up.
Hmmmm… when did the GOP change it's name and branding to "Trump"? Trump is the current face of the brand not the brand itself and based on current political realities the "brand" is doing ok from the federal level right on down the line.which is now the brand of Trump,
What does any of that have to do with the GOP "brand" ?which has nothing to do with princlples of limited govt and fiscal discipline. And the gop controls the WH and SC because of Comey.
Er..umm.. just because you see it that way doesn't mean that it's the "brand", you're defining a political party "brand" by nothing more than the current party leader, which is silly. It's like trying to define the Coca-Cola brand by nothing more than who the current CEO is and what your personal perception of him/her is.
Say what ? Are we both living in the same country? There have been prominent "anti-free trade, immigration and pro deficit" elements in the GOP since at least the Nixon era.
You are substituting your own personal perceptions of Trump and the extremes for the GOP "brand", your personal perceptions of Trump, et. al. do not equal the general perception of the party "brand" (which is associated primarily with social/fiscal conservatism, pro-business, low taxes, pro-military and small(er) government ) AND ONCE AGAIN the political realities indicate that the GOP "brand" is doing fine post-Bush, in fact the numbers indicate that it's doing better now than it did before Prince George entered the national stage.
WTF is "Birthirsim"?