Our CREATED solar system ---- what you are not being told

[rightwinger]

Yes there are simple creatures...mollusks, clams , troglodytes
Their fossilized remains are not found with dinosaurs and human remains
It shows....EVOLUTION

God is a simplistic explanation for how life became

Oh....I actually read your link
It was silly

Mollusks, clams, and troglodytes are NOT simple creatures . They also happen to be aquatic, which means that they didn't live with land animals and there is no reason that they would be found with land animals. There are several very good reasons for this. The FLOOD would have turned most marshy areas to muddy swamps as the rains continued. This would likely kill aquatic creatures in such areas first, as animals and humanity moved to higher ground. The dinosaurs would have died early because they could only venture so high. And humans and birds would have died last as they could either fly of venture ever upward -- until they ran out of places to go. Then again aquatic creatures would have been stranded and covered in muck as the water retreated into the ocean basins GOD had created, as the mountains were pushed upward. It all makes sense to me. I don't know why you cannot at least see things other than what evolutionist spout . They don't know everything --- they were not there and they don't accept divine revelation. But they do believe each other! And they love to hear themselves talk... Sorry, I'm not being very charitable ---- but then, when have evolutionists..?

If there was a flood of that magnitude

Where did the water go?

Read the description of the New earth in Revelations. It is most likely very similar to the "New" earth that GOD originally created for Adam & Eve. The earth was smoother and the oceans were likely shallower and much smaller. There is every likelihood that the surface of the earth was honeycombed with subterranean caverns and reservoirs filled with water. These may likely have been under strategic necessary pressure. There is also the possibility that some sort of canopy of water/ice surrounded the earth to protect everything from ultraviolet light from the sun and slowed the aging process of everything. The oxygen levels at that time likely more concentrated...

Then GOD allowed something to happen. The canopy became unstable and the surface of the planet convulsed. The water shot up as geysers out of the earth. Volcanoes erupted and the canopy rained down upon the planet. This happened in stages over a period of 40 days and longer. As a year progressed, some ares began to drop and deepen and other areas began to rise --- allowing land to reappear and a wind began to dry out the exposed areas.

The earth is presently covered 70% by water. The oceans NOW run 7 miles deep in some areas. The water is still visible and even unseen underground... We now know that there is water under mountains and in many areas. Anyway, that is my feeble attempt at understanding the FLOOD that GOD allowed to happen. This theory certainly does not go against what the Bible does inform us. And it does explain why we see layers of strata. They represent various phases of the FLOOD, the volcanic, meteoric showers, and the drying and resurfacing of this planet. PLUS, since the FLOOD, the earth has never fully recovered and is still convulsing to this very day.

Wow...quite impressive

But if that is the way the earth handled the generation of water and the depletion of water, there would still be evidence of those capability today

There isn’t

And GOD HIMSELF said to Noah that HE would never again bring a Flood of the magnitude to destroy all flesh. And that is evident today.

Yet, there is no geological evidence of a flood of that magnitude

 

[rightwinger]

Tempest in a Testament

What is the point of all this fuss anyway, and why is something as useless and impractical as evolution or creationism taught in the schools, wasting our time, energy, and tax dollars? It's not like we are going to create life somewhere and have to know how. Remember, science fiction is slanted towards the sensational, not the useful or even the possible. In our decadent quibbling times, only the irrelevant and unproductive become issues. This debate is the Kim Kardashian of scientific progress.

A creationist scientist is not going to try to get his experiment to work by letting God do it. He confines that belief to obscure prehistory and proceeds in his actual work just like an atheist scientist would.

The issue at hand is that children are being influenced to believe that there is only MATERIALISM. There is no spirituality because GOD is not real... Schools have replaced philosophy and deep thought with millions of years, a series of accidents, and memorization of select propaganda. They are not allowed the freedom to conclude that Dragons and Dinosaurs are one in the same. They are not allowed to fathom that Noah's Flood likely created most of the fossils that are discovered. Students are dissuaded from perusing the logic that finding dinosaur flesh likely means that such bones cannot be millions of years old, but merely thousands at the most... Evolution is undermining inquiry because it cannot stand upon it own merits with competition. It must eliminate other trains of thought or find itself losing its authority and preeminence.

To advocate that this sort of ignorance and stupidity be taught to children is reckless, irresponsible, and reprehensible.

To presume that others know better than you what is good and practical for your children --- is want is ignorant, stupid, reckless, irresponsible, and reprehensible. If you disagree, I suggest you speak to someone who lived through Stalinism, the Chinese cultural revolution or Nazi Germany. It isn't pretty.

Then your next step would be to consider the evidence. You are not doing this. You are not in a position to lecture anyone. You know less than nothing about evolution amd contstantly say hilariously incorrect things about it , yet presume to judge the truth of it. Even for a child, that is bad behavior.

This has to be the pot trying to call the kettle black. SO, exactly how many different species have "evolutionists" developed from their experimentation with the fruit fly? Have they trained bacteria to walk out of the slime? Do they observe evolution or do they actually ONLY observe variety within species (even those they tamper with endlessly)? Your bad behavior is exhibited every time you apply the F word.

Maybe they can create creatures out of thin air

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You think clams and mollusks have advanced brains?

If there was a flood....ALL creatures would have sunk to the bottom and there would have been a mixture of all complexities of animals

There weren’t

Animals forming fossils would have been buried in layers as they died --- immediately. Those that died and were not so buried would have dissolved, decomposed or been eaten as were the drowned passengers of the Titanic leaving only pairs of shoes in less than 100 years.

You don't know what you are talking about. You need to do some research.

The only fossils that exist occurred when the fossilized organism was quickly buried. If left exposed for any length of time the organism will decay and disappear. I don't believe I can be clearer than that. Fossils are the product of QUICK burial of one sort or another. If you don't get that, I suggest you do your own research.

Which you are using as an argument against fossils in limestone, and you could be more clearly wrong about every bit of it.

Limestone forms quickly under pressure.

So? Stop just vomiting out authoritative statements without forming an argument around them.

 

[LittleNipper]

This program, by a former atheist/evolutionist, demonstrates that what evolutionists have predicted in fact is not what astronomers observes. In fact, they insist on using catastrophic events to explain these ambiguities. Oddly, they will not accept the Flood of Noah as such a catastrophic event on earth even though there is enough water to cover the entire earth with 1.5 depth of water. The reason for this seems to be obvious. Evolutionists do not want to accept either a young creation nor a CREATOR! Watch the following and be astounded:

Why is this in the science forum?

Because truth is the foundation of science, not merely naturalism. And it is rather hoped that someone like yourself would devise a perfect experiment to prove some of this correct instead of just mouthing off in an exclusive sort of way and walking the "party line".

Truth yes, your blind faith not so much. Have this moved to the religious section where it belongs. Leave the science section for actual science.

My faith isn't blind. Are my prayers answered? Does archaeology verify the various places mentioned in the Bible? Can Scientists concoct living biological organisms from inert materials? Have evolutionists been able to develop new species from mating fruit flies? Who exhibits blind faith? --- clearly it's those who reject GOD.

 

[LittleNipper]

Mollusks, clams, and troglodytes are NOT simple creatures . They also happen to be aquatic, which means that they didn't live with land animals and there is no reason that they would be found with land animals. There are several very good reasons for this. The FLOOD would have turned most marshy areas to muddy swamps as the rains continued. This would likely kill aquatic creatures in such areas first, as animals and humanity moved to higher ground. The dinosaurs would have died early because they could only venture so high. And humans and birds would have died last as they could either fly of venture ever upward -- until they ran out of places to go. Then again aquatic creatures would have been stranded and covered in muck as the water retreated into the ocean basins GOD had created, as the mountains were pushed upward. It all makes sense to me. I don't know why you cannot at least see things other than what evolutionist spout . They don't know everything --- they were not there and they don't accept divine revelation. But they do believe each other! And they love to hear themselves talk... Sorry, I'm not being very charitable ---- but then, when have evolutionists..?

If there was a flood of that magnitude

Where did the water go?

Read the description of the New earth in Revelations. It is most likely very similar to the "New" earth that GOD originally created for Adam & Eve. The earth was smoother and the oceans were likely shallower and much smaller. There is every likelihood that the surface of the earth was honeycombed with subterranean caverns and reservoirs filled with water. These may likely have been under strategic necessary pressure. There is also the possibility that some sort of canopy of water/ice surrounded the earth to protect everything from ultraviolet light from the sun and slowed the aging process of everything. The oxygen levels at that time likely more concentrated...

Then GOD allowed something to happen. The canopy became unstable and the surface of the planet convulsed. The water shot up as geysers out of the earth. Volcanoes erupted and the canopy rained down upon the planet. This happened in stages over a period of 40 days and longer. As a year progressed, some ares began to drop and deepen and other areas began to rise --- allowing land to reappear and a wind began to dry out the exposed areas.

The earth is presently covered 70% by water. The oceans NOW run 7 miles deep in some areas. The water is still visible and even unseen underground... We now know that there is water under mountains and in many areas. Anyway, that is my feeble attempt at understanding the FLOOD that GOD allowed to happen. This theory certainly does not go against what the Bible does inform us. And it does explain why we see layers of strata. They represent various phases of the FLOOD, the volcanic, meteoric showers, and the drying and resurfacing of this planet. PLUS, since the FLOOD, the earth has never fully recovered and is still convulsing to this very day.

Wow...quite impressive

But if that is the way the earth handled the generation of water and the depletion of water, there would still be evidence of those capability today

There isn’t

And GOD HIMSELF said to Noah that HE would never again bring a Flood of the magnitude to destroy all flesh. And that is evident today.

Yet, there is no geological evidence of a flood of that magnitude

With all the canyons, all the deserts, all the coal fields, all the fossil graveyards, all the strata, and you say there is no evidence? All of this points to THE FLOOD and not millions of years...

 

[Old Rocks]

And all of them from different eras. Little Nipper, you are pathetic.

 

[Crepitus]

This program, by a former atheist/evolutionist, demonstrates that what evolutionists have predicted in fact is not what astronomers observes. In fact, they insist on using catastrophic events to explain these ambiguities. Oddly, they will not accept the Flood of Noah as such a catastrophic event on earth even though there is enough water to cover the entire earth with 1.5 depth of water. The reason for this seems to be obvious. Evolutionists do not want to accept either a young creation nor a CREATOR! Watch the following and be astounded:

Why is this in the science forum?

Because truth is the foundation of science, not merely naturalism. And it is rather hoped that someone like yourself would devise a perfect experiment to prove some of this correct instead of just mouthing off in an exclusive sort of way and walking the "party line".

Truth yes, your blind faith not so much. Have this moved to the religious section where it belongs. Leave the science section for actual science.

My faith isn't blind. Are my prayers answered? Does archaeology verify the various places mentioned in the Bible? Can Scientists concoct living biological organisms from inert materials? Have evolutionists been able to develop new species from mating fruit flies? Who exhibits blind faith? --- clearly it's those who reject GOD.

Uh huh, sure.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If there was a flood of that magnitude

Where did the water go?

Read the description of the New earth in Revelations. It is most likely very similar to the "New" earth that GOD originally created for Adam & Eve. The earth was smoother and the oceans were likely shallower and much smaller. There is every likelihood that the surface of the earth was honeycombed with subterranean caverns and reservoirs filled with water. These may likely have been under strategic necessary pressure. There is also the possibility that some sort of canopy of water/ice surrounded the earth to protect everything from ultraviolet light from the sun and slowed the aging process of everything. The oxygen levels at that time likely more concentrated...

Then GOD allowed something to happen. The canopy became unstable and the surface of the planet convulsed. The water shot up as geysers out of the earth. Volcanoes erupted and the canopy rained down upon the planet. This happened in stages over a period of 40 days and longer. As a year progressed, some ares began to drop and deepen and other areas began to rise --- allowing land to reappear and a wind began to dry out the exposed areas.

The earth is presently covered 70% by water. The oceans NOW run 7 miles deep in some areas. The water is still visible and even unseen underground... We now know that there is water under mountains and in many areas. Anyway, that is my feeble attempt at understanding the FLOOD that GOD allowed to happen. This theory certainly does not go against what the Bible does inform us. And it does explain why we see layers of strata. They represent various phases of the FLOOD, the volcanic, meteoric showers, and the drying and resurfacing of this planet. PLUS, since the FLOOD, the earth has never fully recovered and is still convulsing to this very day.

Wow...quite impressive

But if that is the way the earth handled the generation of water and the depletion of water, there would still be evidence of those capability today

There isn’t

And GOD HIMSELF said to Noah that HE would never again bring a Flood of the magnitude to destroy all flesh. And that is evident today.

Yet, there is no geological evidence of a flood of that magnitude

With all the canyons, all the deserts, all the coal fields, all the fossil graveyards, all the strata, and you say there is no evidence? All of this points to THE FLOOD and not millions of years...

And yet all the people who taught us everything we know about all of that say it directly contradicts this flood myth nonsense.

 

[james bond]

Mollusks, clams, and troglodytes are NOT simple creatures . They also happen to be aquatic, which means that they didn't live with land animals and there is no reason that they would be found with land animals. There are several very good reasons for this. The FLOOD would have turned most marshy areas to muddy swamps as the rains continued. This would likely kill aquatic creatures in such areas first, as animals and humanity moved to higher ground. The dinosaurs would have died early because they could only venture so high. And humans and birds would have died last as they could either fly of venture ever upward -- until they ran out of places to go. Then again aquatic creatures would have been stranded and covered in muck as the water retreated into the ocean basins GOD had created, as the mountains were pushed upward. It all makes sense to me. I don't know why you cannot at least see things other than what evolutionist spout . They don't know everything --- they were not there and they don't accept divine revelation. But they do believe each other! And they love to hear themselves talk... Sorry, I'm not being very charitable ---- but then, when have evolutionists..?

If there was a flood of that magnitude

Where did the water go?

Read the description of the New earth in Revelations. It is most likely very similar to the "New" earth that GOD originally created for Adam & Eve. The earth was smoother and the oceans were likely shallower and much smaller. There is every likelihood that the surface of the earth was honeycombed with subterranean caverns and reservoirs filled with water. These may likely have been under strategic necessary pressure. There is also the possibility that some sort of canopy of water/ice surrounded the earth to protect everything from ultraviolet light from the sun and slowed the aging process of everything. The oxygen levels at that time likely more concentrated...

Then GOD allowed something to happen. The canopy became unstable and the surface of the planet convulsed. The water shot up as geysers out of the earth. Volcanoes erupted and the canopy rained down upon the planet. This happened in stages over a period of 40 days and longer. As a year progressed, some ares began to drop and deepen and other areas began to rise --- allowing land to reappear and a wind began to dry out the exposed areas.

The earth is presently covered 70% by water. The oceans NOW run 7 miles deep in some areas. The water is still visible and even unseen underground... We now know that there is water under mountains and in many areas. Anyway, that is my feeble attempt at understanding the FLOOD that GOD allowed to happen. This theory certainly does not go against what the Bible does inform us. And it does explain why we see layers of strata. They represent various phases of the FLOOD, the volcanic, meteoric showers, and the drying and resurfacing of this planet. PLUS, since the FLOOD, the earth has never fully recovered and is still convulsing to this very day.

Wow...quite impressive

But if that is the way the earth handled the generation of water and the depletion of water, there would still be evidence of those capability today

There isn’t

And GOD HIMSELF said to Noah that HE would never again bring a Flood of the magnitude to destroy all flesh. And that is evident today.

Yet, there is no geological evidence of a flood of that magnitude

Ha ha. You are blind as a bat with no sonar. Did you just concuss yourself? The observable evidence is we're the only planet with 3/4 water on its surface.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If there was a flood of that magnitude

Where did the water go?

Read the description of the New earth in Revelations. It is most likely very similar to the "New" earth that GOD originally created for Adam & Eve. The earth was smoother and the oceans were likely shallower and much smaller. There is every likelihood that the surface of the earth was honeycombed with subterranean caverns and reservoirs filled with water. These may likely have been under strategic necessary pressure. There is also the possibility that some sort of canopy of water/ice surrounded the earth to protect everything from ultraviolet light from the sun and slowed the aging process of everything. The oxygen levels at that time likely more concentrated...

Then GOD allowed something to happen. The canopy became unstable and the surface of the planet convulsed. The water shot up as geysers out of the earth. Volcanoes erupted and the canopy rained down upon the planet. This happened in stages over a period of 40 days and longer. As a year progressed, some ares began to drop and deepen and other areas began to rise --- allowing land to reappear and a wind began to dry out the exposed areas.

The earth is presently covered 70% by water. The oceans NOW run 7 miles deep in some areas. The water is still visible and even unseen underground... We now know that there is water under mountains and in many areas. Anyway, that is my feeble attempt at understanding the FLOOD that GOD allowed to happen. This theory certainly does not go against what the Bible does inform us. And it does explain why we see layers of strata. They represent various phases of the FLOOD, the volcanic, meteoric showers, and the drying and resurfacing of this planet. PLUS, since the FLOOD, the earth has never fully recovered and is still convulsing to this very day.

Wow...quite impressive

But if that is the way the earth handled the generation of water and the depletion of water, there would still be evidence of those capability today

There isn’t

And GOD HIMSELF said to Noah that HE would never again bring a Flood of the magnitude to destroy all flesh. And that is evident today.

Yet, there is no geological evidence of a flood of that magnitude

Ha ha. You are blind as a bat with no sonar. Did you just concuss yourself? The observable evidence is we're the only planet with 3/4 water on its surface.

That is not evidence for the truth of a global flood myth. In fact, it is evidence against it, as the water can only cover that portion of the surface.

 

[james bond]

Read the description of the New earth in Revelations. It is most likely very similar to the "New" earth that GOD originally created for Adam & Eve. The earth was smoother and the oceans were likely shallower and much smaller. There is every likelihood that the surface of the earth was honeycombed with subterranean caverns and reservoirs filled with water. These may likely have been under strategic necessary pressure. There is also the possibility that some sort of canopy of water/ice surrounded the earth to protect everything from ultraviolet light from the sun and slowed the aging process of everything. The oxygen levels at that time likely more concentrated...

Then GOD allowed something to happen. The canopy became unstable and the surface of the planet convulsed. The water shot up as geysers out of the earth. Volcanoes erupted and the canopy rained down upon the planet. This happened in stages over a period of 40 days and longer. As a year progressed, some ares began to drop and deepen and other areas began to rise --- allowing land to reappear and a wind began to dry out the exposed areas.

The earth is presently covered 70% by water. The oceans NOW run 7 miles deep in some areas. The water is still visible and even unseen underground... We now know that there is water under mountains and in many areas. Anyway, that is my feeble attempt at understanding the FLOOD that GOD allowed to happen. This theory certainly does not go against what the Bible does inform us. And it does explain why we see layers of strata. They represent various phases of the FLOOD, the volcanic, meteoric showers, and the drying and resurfacing of this planet. PLUS, since the FLOOD, the earth has never fully recovered and is still convulsing to this very day.

Wow...quite impressive

But if that is the way the earth handled the generation of water and the depletion of water, there would still be evidence of those capability today

There isn’t

And GOD HIMSELF said to Noah that HE would never again bring a Flood of the magnitude to destroy all flesh. And that is evident today.

Yet, there is no geological evidence of a flood of that magnitude

Ha ha. You are blind as a bat with no sonar. Did you just concuss yourself? The observable evidence is we're the only planet with 3/4 water on its surface.

That is not evidence for the truth of a global flood myth. In fact, it is evidence against it, as the water can only cover that portion of the surface.

Sez the lowest common denominator. You just do not get it.

 

[LittleNipper]

And all of them from different eras. Little Nipper, you are pathetic.

There is NO positive proof of any of this, only uniformitarian conjecture. Different areas suggests worldwide. You are blind.

 

[LittleNipper]

The issue at hand is that children are being influenced to believe that there is only MATERIALISM. There is no spirituality because GOD is not real... Schools have replaced philosophy and deep thought with millions of years, a series of accidents, and memorization of select propaganda. They are not allowed the freedom to conclude that Dragons and Dinosaurs are one in the same. They are not allowed to fathom that Noah's Flood likely created most of the fossils that are discovered. Students are dissuaded from perusing the logic that finding dinosaur flesh likely means that such bones cannot be millions of years old, but merely thousands at the most... Evolution is undermining inquiry because it cannot stand upon it own merits with competition. It must eliminate other trains of thought or find itself losing its authority and preeminence.

To advocate that this sort of ignorance and stupidity be taught to children is reckless, irresponsible, and reprehensible.

To presume that others know better than you what is good and practical for your children --- is want is ignorant, stupid, reckless, irresponsible, and reprehensible. If you disagree, I suggest you speak to someone who lived through Stalinism, the Chinese cultural revolution or Nazi Germany. It isn't pretty.

Then your next step would be to consider the evidence. You are not doing this. You are not in a position to lecture anyone. You know less than nothing about evolution amd contstantly say hilariously incorrect things about it , yet presume to judge the truth of it. Even for a child, that is bad behavior.

This has to be the pot trying to call the kettle black. SO, exactly how many different species have "evolutionists" developed from their experimentation with the fruit fly? Have they trained bacteria to walk out of the slime? Do they observe evolution or do they actually ONLY observe variety within species (even those they tamper with endlessly)? Your bad behavior is exhibited every time you apply the F word.

Maybe they can create creatures out of thin air

SO, were exactly did the fish come from? And while blinking a car into existence is funny, the fact remains that MAN (whose in the image of GOD) designed the automobile, starting with cars like the "curve dash" Oldsmobile then the "Tin-Lizzie". Each one was a separate fabrication. Oh, there was some duplication of various mechanical parts through the years; however, this is only because they existed to do the same thing in an established environment.

So, what are the evolutionists hiding? More than you likely suspect! And it would seem for obvious reasons.

 

[LittleNipper]

And should we really trust evolutionists? Evolutionists Confess to Lying | CEH

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Has this thread been moved to the conspiracy theory section yet?

 

[LittleNipper]

Has this thread been moved to the conspiracy theory section yet?

Why should it? There is plenty of scientific data being promoted, it's just not to YOUR liking. Just because you cannot accept GOD doesn't mean that GOD isn't real. Just like the totally blind man from birth who cannot perceive color. That doesn't mean that color doesn't exist and that others realize that it does.

New Discoveries in Fossils that Refute Darwinism Ignored by Evolutionists

 

[Old Rocks]

And all of them from different eras. Little Nipper, you are pathetic.

There is NO positive proof of any of this, only uniformitarian conjecture. Different areas suggests worldwide. You are blind.

You are an idiot. Many methods of dating have proven the fossils are from many different time periods. These methods are based on the same physical laws which govern the building of our nuclear reactors.

 

[Rosy]

This program, by a former atheist/evolutionist, demonstrates that what evolutionists have predicted in fact is not what astronomers observes. In fact, they insist on using catastrophic events to explain these ambiguities. Oddly, they will not accept the Flood of Noah as such a catastrophic event on earth even though there is enough water to cover the entire earth with 1.5 depth of water. The reason for this seems to be obvious. Evolutionists do not want to accept either a young creation nor a CREATOR! Watch the following and be astounded:

There isn't even another solar system in range to compare ours too, so saying that it was build is dumb as there is no evidence.

How is your foil hat

 

[indiajo]

Just because the surface of this planet isn't smooth now, doesn't scientifically prove it wasn't at sometime in the past. The fool is the atheist who digs his own hole and jumps in.

You don't know what scientific evidence is, do you?
And if you don't know that, don't dare to talk about "prove".

 

[fncceo]

Does anyone here have any tiniest idea of how big the universe is?

Bigger than Texas?