Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All partys , they radomly called voters.
They did not use their political affliation in the poll.
You are pretending they did without one shread of evidence to show it.
you can go on believing that if it makes you feel better.You guys are losing your grip on this country.
Your ideas themselves are losing it for you
All partys , they radomly called voters.
They did not use their political affliation in the poll.
You are pretending they did without one shread of evidence to show it.
do NOT say I am pretending.
I do not pretend.
They would most certainly show the demographics if it was of both parties or multiple ideologies. WHy wouldnt they?
It would lend credbility to the poll.
You know something TM...you are just way too pathetic in your thinking to argue with anymore.
You will argue till you are blue in the face about something like a poll not having to present demographics of those polled....and if it doesnt, then it is a true "sampling" of ALL thinkers.
That is not just pathetic....it is immature and unrealistic.
and the ironic thing about this poll....
2.161,000 people voted.
The actual amount of those that can vote is much higher (cannot find the numbers, but that is obvious as nowhere near those that are "voters" actually vote in ANY state.
Of that number, a shade over 1 million voted for the Walkers opponent, Barrett.
So to say 1 million of the likely over 3 million voters in Wisonsin would like a recall is pretty much saying nothing at all.....I could have said that without taking a poll.
If anything...it is showing that many who voted fore Walkers opponent (Barrett) are actually NOT for the recall....
You see TM....practice what you preach...DO some research before you spew crap.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZoO0yE8I8&feature=related
Now you are questioning them because you dont like their political bent.
Will you question every rassmusen poll because of the bent of their owner?
You see I dont question Rass because their owner is a right wing proponent.
I question Rass because of their results.
Their results ususally lean to the right of all other polls.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZoO0yE8I8&feature=related
Now you are questioning them because you dont like their political bent.
Will you question every rassmusen poll because of the bent of their owner?
You see I dont question Rass because their owner is a right wing proponent.
I question Rass because of their results.
Their results ususally lean to the right of all other polls.
Sure they do...and why? Becuase those they poll tend to lean to the right. How do I know? Becuase Rasmussen lists the demographics of those polled.
Fox polls also lean to the right. Why? Becuase they clearly state "those that watch fox news were polled"...and I am well aware that fox news has a preominately right leaning audience.
So the question is...why did this polling company NOT do what other polling companies do? Why did they NOT state the demographics?
All partys , they radomly called voters.
They did not use their political affliation in the poll.
You are pretending they did without one shread of evidence to show it.
do NOT say I am pretending.
I do not pretend.
They would most certainly show the demographics if it was of both parties or multiple ideologies. WHy wouldnt they?
It would lend credbility to the poll.
You know something TM...you are just way too pathetic in your thinking to argue with anymore.
You will argue till you are blue in the face about something like a poll not having to present demographics of those polled....and if it doesnt, then it is a true "sampling" of ALL thinkers.
That is not just pathetic....it is immature and unrealistic.
They called them radomly, THAT is what the poll says.
They did not collect party affliation data.
How can they show what they did not collect data on?
and the ironic thing about this poll....
2.161,000 people voted.
The actual amount of those that can vote is much higher (cannot find the numbers, but that is obvious as nowhere near those that are "voters" actually vote in ANY state.
Of that number, a shade over 1 million voted for the Walkers opponent, Barrett.
So to say 1 million of the likely over 3 million voters in Wisonsin would like a recall is pretty much saying nothing at all.....I could have said that without taking a poll.
If anything...it is showing that many who voted fore Walkers opponent (Barrett) are actually NOT for the recall....
You see TM....practice what you preach...DO some research before you spew crap.
How about proving some facts to back those numbers?
Jarhead it is YOUR responsibility to provide YOUR links to where you got YOUR numbers.
Pretending that IM supposed to reserch your every claim is pretty partisan of you.
Heres a fun fact for you , In wisconson you can registar to vote on the day of an election.
There seem to be enough votes to put a recall on the ballot.
How many nes voters will come out just to vote these guys out?
You will be surprized how the youth vote will turn out in these types of elections when they see what the republicans are trying to do.
The youth vote is alway low in the mid term elections.
Jarhead it is YOUR responsibility to provide YOUR links to where you got YOUR numbers.
Pretending that IM supposed to reserch your every claim is pretty partisan of you.
Heres a fun fact for you , In wisconson you can registar to vote on the day of an election.
There seem to be enough votes to put a recall on the ballot.
<gibberish deleted>
Jarhead it is YOUR responsibility to provide YOUR links to where you got YOUR numbers.
If I want to find what someone else says is accurate, I do the quick booleans seach and find the info. I call it personal responsibility. I guess you like having others do the work for you. No problem, I posted the olink for you.
Pretending that IM supposed to reserch your every claim is pretty partisan of you.
I pretended nothing. There is no rule. I live by personal responsibility and it works quite well for me. I prefer to find proof on my own and not count on others to do it for me.
Heres a fun fact for you , In wisconson you can registar to vote on the day of an election.
There seem to be enough votes to put a recall on the ballot.
How many news voters will come out just to vote these guys out?
Just as many that will come out that WANT them in....both parties had voters who did not vote and will in a recall
You will be surprized how the youth vote will turn out in these types of elections when they see what the republicans are trying to do.
Logic says it will have to be an unattainable number seeing as Walker won by 6% points and Barrett already is losing 1/3 of those that voted for him according to your poll.
The youth vote is always low in the mid term elections.
They did it randomly and did not collect the demographics.
Please explain to me what private polling company would be able to stay in business charging clients to take political polls but neglecting to do the one thing ALL political polls do...ask for political affiliation.
That is like hiring a tax accountant who, at tax time, opts not to write off your deductions....one would never stay in business.
