Wildman
Gold Member
Where does this foolish PC end?
my take;
Where does this libertard, foolishness PC end?
my answer;
NEVER !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where does this foolish PC end?
Just wondering: Should we rename Washington DC because Washington had slaves? Tear down the Jefferson memorial? Rename Washington state?
Where does this foolish PC end?
They would have had MORE power to keep them as slavesActually you are now being totally ignorant of what the 3/5s rule meantYou now show your complete ignorance.
It ONLY applied to counting population for apportioning representatives. The south wanted slaves to count as a full person, the north wanted them not counted at all
Those exra representatives for four million slaves meant that the south had more power to keep them slaves
Done being an asshole now?
LOL, don't you feel smug proving my point?
What would have happened had the South been given the power to count them as full "person"?
You are not a bright individual kid.
Showing you have no fucking idea what you are babbling about
Seriously?
I will restate my position....it's not that you aren't a bright individual....it's that you are an ignorant moron bereft of the ability to even understand what you yourself are talking about
The 3/5ths clause was an attempt to even the playing field electorally kid, stick with me and I'll learn ya.
Ummmk?
Even the playing field?
By counting people with no rights as citizens? Then using the additional "uneven" representation to ensure they remain enslaved? You effectively had elective representatives of people with no rights as citizens
You are dumber than you look
Our liberal founding fathers never believed thatActually....they were fighting "taxation without representation"Sure they weren't Conservatives, wanting things in the colonies to remain the same, rejecting the Kings ever increasing taxes?
Imagine that.......every man having a right to vote for his representative
Another LIBERAL concept still fought against by conservatives
How about the right to vote when you have no skin in the game?
No one should have the right to vote for free shit from the ones who pay...PERIOD!!!!
Another conservative who doesn't understand the concept of the inalienable right to vote.
I understand all to well the liberal mindset.
If you dont pay into the pot you shouldnt have any say in how it's spent.
That is a conservative value. You must have money to vote
BTW, since you apparently are linking rebellion with being liberal by trying to claim the founders as liberal. Are you arguing that the confederate states were liberals? That those Western PA folks were liberals during the Whiskey rebellion? That, gasp, Cliven Bundy and his band of merry men are liberals?
Ummmm....no shit ShirlockThey would have had MORE power to keep them as slavesActually you are now being totally ignorant of what the 3/5s rule meant
It ONLY applied to counting population for apportioning representatives. The south wanted slaves to count as a full person, the north wanted them not counted at all
Those exra representatives for four million slaves meant that the south had more power to keep them slaves
Done being an asshole now?
LOL, don't you feel smug proving my point?
What would have happened had the South been given the power to count them as full "person"?
You are not a bright individual kid.
Showing you have no fucking idea what you are babbling about
Seriously?
I will restate my position....it's not that you aren't a bright individual....it's that you are an ignorant moron bereft of the ability to even understand what you yourself are talking about
The 3/5ths clause was an attempt to even the playing field electorally kid, stick with me and I'll learn ya.
Ummmk?
Even the playing field?
By counting people with no rights as citizens? Then using the additional "uneven" representation to ensure they remain enslaved? You effectively had elective representatives of people with no rights as citizens
You are dumber than you look
Your lack of education betrays you, the slaves were "owned" , had no "Right" to Vote and yet could have been counted as a citizen and help the South gain more Congressional Representation thereby gaining an unfair advantage in said congress, the 3/5th's clause aimed to render that advantage null and void.
You should have taken a real constitutional class.
I own two houses......does that mean I get to vote for Hillary twice?Our liberal founding fathers never believed thatActually....they were fighting "taxation without representation"
Imagine that.......every man having a right to vote for his representative
Another LIBERAL concept still fought against by conservatives
How about the right to vote when you have no skin in the game?
No one should have the right to vote for free shit from the ones who pay...PERIOD!!!!
Another conservative who doesn't understand the concept of the inalienable right to vote.
I understand all to well the liberal mindset.
If you dont pay into the pot you shouldnt have any say in how it's spent.
That is a conservative value. You must have money to vote
The Founding Fathers believe only property owners should be allowed to vote because they had a stake in the outcome. That means welfare deadbeats like you wouldn't get a say.
Ummmm....no shit ShirlockThey would have had MORE power to keep them as slavesLOL, don't you feel smug proving my point?
What would have happened had the South been given the power to count them as full "person"?
You are not a bright individual kid.
Showing you have no fucking idea what you are babbling about
Seriously?
I will restate my position....it's not that you aren't a bright individual....it's that you are an ignorant moron bereft of the ability to even understand what you yourself are talking about
The 3/5ths clause was an attempt to even the playing field electorally kid, stick with me and I'll learn ya.
Ummmk?
Even the playing field?
By counting people with no rights as citizens? Then using the additional "uneven" representation to ensure they remain enslaved? You effectively had elective representatives of people with no rights as citizens
You are dumber than you look
Your lack of education betrays you, the slaves were "owned" , had no "Right" to Vote and yet could have been counted as a citizen and help the South gain more Congressional Representation thereby gaining an unfair advantage in said congress, the 3/5th's clause aimed to render that advantage null and void.
You should have taken a real constitutional class.
You think repeating what I just posted makes you appear smarter?
I own two houses......does that mean I get to vote for Hillary twice?Our liberal founding fathers never believed thatHow about the right to vote when you have no skin in the game?
No one should have the right to vote for free shit from the ones who pay...PERIOD!!!!
Another conservative who doesn't understand the concept of the inalienable right to vote.
I understand all to well the liberal mindset.
If you dont pay into the pot you shouldnt have any say in how it's spent.
That is a conservative value. You must have money to vote
The Founding Fathers believe only property owners should be allowed to vote because they had a stake in the outcome. That means welfare deadbeats like you wouldn't get a say.
I'm a liberal......we get free stuffI have no doubt he has 2 houses.
one on Park Place, the other on Boardwalk
Just wondering: Should we rename Washington DC because Washington had slaves? Tear down the Jefferson memorial? Rename Washington state?
Where does this foolish PC end?
Why should we rename monuments to our liberal founders?
Just wondering: Should we rename Washington DC because Washington had slaves? Tear down the Jefferson memorial? Rename Washington state?
Where does this foolish PC end?
Why should we rename monuments to our liberal founders?
Washington and Jefferson were slave owners. By your definition, they were evil and must be removed from history. BTW, they were not even close to today's liberals.
Just wondering: Should we rename Washington DC because Washington had slaves? Tear down the Jefferson memorial? Rename Washington state?
Where does this foolish PC end?
Why should we rename monuments to our liberal founders?
Washington and Jefferson were slave owners. By your definition, they were evil and must be removed from history. BTW, they were not even close to today's liberals.
They were a product of their times and the greatest liberals of their day
Not according to history. Democrats thought blacks were slaves and still do. They pay them to stay in the ghetto.Imagine a world where a certain class was born to rule over those who were born to lower classes
Your position in society was based on your birth, not what you accomplish after your birth
The liberals of the day stood up and declared.......All men are created equal
They created a country where the lowest farm hand had the same vote as the richest land owner
Thank a liberal
.
Not according to history. Democrats thought blacks were slaves and still do. They pay them to stay in the ghetto.Imagine a world where a certain class was born to rule over those who were born to lower classes
Your position in society was based on your birth, not what you accomplish after your birth
The liberals of the day stood up and declared.......All men are created equal
They created a country where the lowest farm hand had the same vote as the richest land owner
Thank a liberal
.
Just wondering: Should we rename Washington DC because Washington had slaves? Tear down the Jefferson memorial? Rename Washington state?
Where does this foolish PC end?
Why should we rename monuments to our liberal founders?
Washington and Jefferson were slave owners. By your definition, they were evil and must be removed from history. BTW, they were not even close to today's liberals.
They were a product of their times and the greatest liberals of their day
That is a huge lie. By today's standards they were far right conservatives.
BTW, can you post some pics of the whitehouse lit up in red, white, and blue on independence day?
Just wondering: Should we rename Washington DC because Washington had slaves? Tear down the Jefferson memorial? Rename Washington state?
Where does this foolish PC end?
Why should we rename monuments to our liberal founders?
Washington and Jefferson were slave owners. By your definition, they were evil and must be removed from history. BTW, they were not even close to today's liberals.
They were a product of their times and the greatest liberals of their day
That is a huge lie. By today's standards they were far right conservatives.
BTW, can you post some pics of the whitehouse lit up in red, white, and blue on independence day?
Far right conservatives in 1776 supported the King
Liberals used to tar and feather them
You are incorrect. White land owning men could vote.Imagine a world where a certain class was born to rule over those who were born to lower classes
Your position in society was based on your birth, not what you accomplish after your birth
The liberals of the day stood up and declared.......All men are created equal
They created a country where the lowest farm hand had the same vote as the richest land owner
Thank a liberal
.
Just wondering: Should we rename Washington DC because Washington had slaves? Tear down the Jefferson memorial? Rename Washington state?
Where does this foolish PC end?
Why should we rename monuments to our liberal founders?
Washington and Jefferson were slave owners. By your definition, they were evil and must be removed from history. BTW, they were not even close to today's liberals.
They were a product of their times and the greatest liberals of their day
That is a huge lie. By today's standards they were far right conservatives.
BTW, can you post some pics of the whitehouse lit up in red, white, and blue on independence day?
Far right conservatives in 1776 supported the King
Liberals used to tar and feather them