[OFFICIAL] 2015 USMB STATE OF THE UNION

[Gracie]

What can I say? Well, I can say he is a great speaker, very charismatic, very believable. He can and did fool a lot of people with that ability. Either he is naive or clueless or is quite aware of just how awful of a mess he has created and hoped to go out fooling more people yet one last time.
He's good at what he does. Smooth talking while fucking everything up. Classic case of Narcissistic personality disorder, in my opinion.

I think what I enjoyed most in this final speech was watching paul ryan trying to keep a poker face and mainly not able to, the one guy falling asleep, and the military guys in the front row killing him with their eyes since they were probably ordered to not move a muscle. And they didn't. They just glared.

 

[Gracie]

And...is anyone going to fact check his claims during this final SOTU?

 

[Gracie]

Oh. Wait. Someone did.

Fact-Checking Obama’s Final State of the Union

 

[Gracie]

User Actions
Follow​

​

Megyn KellyVerified account‏@megynkelly​

.@TedCruz: “This was less a State of the Union, than it was a state of denial.” #KellyFile #SOTU

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Obama urges nation not to fear future

Obama urges nation not to fear future

Only if the Dictator declares Martial Law, would I fear the future, for that would have the country enter another civil war. But if we can get past the 2016 elections, finally remove the last far left liberal from power, then the people could start to see a road to REAL recovery. This SOTU address just showed how much of a petulant cry baby, Obama really is, because in the first 2 years of his presidency, he, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid, could of made any law they wanted to FORCE upon US, but it was most important to take our right to CHOOSE, whether to have healthcare or not. You can thank Jonathan Gruber for that.

Obamacare: Voters, are you stupid? - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- Years-old but newly scrutinized videos of MIT economics professor Jonathan Gruber ignited a political firestorm this week because the self-described architect of Obamacare thanks "the stupidity of the LIBERAL American voter" for leading to passage of the president's signature piece of legislation.

I inserted the LIBERAL in front of the American voter, because we conservatives KNEW how damaging ACA was going to be. Liberals in their stupidity, as Jonathan pointed out, are too stupid and got screwed by the liberal elites.

I for one will breath a sigh of relief when there will be no more speeches from the first 1/2 president.

 

[Liberal Pothead]

Barack Hussein Obama, you are a liar. You have always been a liar.

If these proposals are so great for the middle class, then why did you wait until there was absolutely no chance of getting them passed to propose them?

Don't answer that Barack, you'll just lie. I will answer it with the truth:

The reason you didn't propose this nonsense until now is because you don't really want them to pass. You don't REALLY give a shit about the middle class, you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them. You are setting up your low information base with a big fat lie to rally behind for the POTUS race coming up.

You are the Liar-In-Chief and the worst president in the history of the US.

Why are you so hard on the guy? He smoked pot, probably still does, so he can't be that bad. If more people smoked pot, the world would be a better place.

 

[SwimExpert]

Oh look, someone's latest sock is here.

 

[Liberal Pothead]

Oh look, someone's latest sock is here.

What's that? You found my sock? I've been looking everywhere for it.

 

[Mertex]

Obama has been in charge, with the first 2 years, in complete and total Democrat control.

That is such a load of crap and the kind of myths the Republicans like to spread.....repeating a lie over and over doesn't make it "truth" - but in the minds of conservatives, it's good enough.

One particular lie, often stated by right-of-center advocates, is the statement....

"if Barack Obama wanted to increase taxes on the rich, stop the wars, pass a budget...blah, blah.....he could have chosen to do so because he had "total control" of the House and Senate for two full years."​

Sometimes the "two full years" is omitted from the statement......but the lie is spread nevertheless, by the

"total control of Congress"​

phrase.
Let's clear that all up, shall we?
​

There is no question that Democrats had total control in the House from 2009-2011.
But legislation does not become law without the Senate.

"Total control", then, of the Senate requires 60 Democratic or Republican Senators.

On January 20th, 2009, 57 Senate seats were held by Democrats with 2 Independents (Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman) caucusing with the Democrats...which gave Democrats 59 mostly-reliable Democratic votes in the Senate, one shy of filibuster-proof "total control." Republicans held 41 seats.​

The 59 number in January, 2009 included Ted Kennedy and Al Franken. Kennedy had a seizure

during an Obama inaugural luncheon​

and never returned to vote in the Senate.....and Al Franken was

not officially seated until July 7th, 2009​

(hotly contested recount demanded by Norm Coleman.)

The real Democratic Senate seat number in January, 2009 was 55 Democrats plus 2 Independents equaling 57 Senate seats.

Then in April, 2009, Republican Senator Arlen

Specter became a Democrat​

. Kennedy was still at home, dying, and Al Franken was still not seated. Score in April, 2009....Democratic votes 58.
In May, 2009, Robert Byrd got sick and did not return to the Senate until July 21, 2009. Even though Franken was finally seated July 7, 2009 and Byrd returned on July 21.....Democrats still only had 59 votes in the Senate because Kennedy never returned, dying on August 25, 2009.
Kennedy's empty seat was

temporarily filled by Paul Kirk but not until September 24, 2009.​

​

The swearing in of Kirk finally gave Democrats 60 votes (at least potentially) in the Senate.

"Total control" of Congress by Democrats lasted all of 4 months.​

From September 24, 2009 through February 4, 2010...at which point Scott Brown, a Republican, was sworn in to replace Kennedy's Massachusetts seat.

Did President Obama have "total control" of Congress? Yes, for 4 entire months. And it was during that very small time window that Obamacare was passed in the Senate with 60 all-Democratic votes.
Did President Obama have "total control' of Congress during his first two years as president? Absolutely not and any assertions to the contrary.....as you can plainly see in the above chronology....is a lie.​

When Obama Had

Educate yourself.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Obama has been in charge, with the first 2 years, in complete and total Democrat control.

That is such a load of crap and the kind of myths the Republicans like to spread.....repeating a lie over and over doesn't make it "truth" - but in the minds of conservatives, it's good enough.

One particular lie, often stated by right-of-center advocates, is the statement....
"if Barack Obama wanted to increase taxes on the rich, stop the wars, pass a budget...blah, blah.....he could have chosen to do so because he had "total control" of the House and Senate for two full years."
Sometimes the "two full years" is omitted from the statement......but the lie is spread nevertheless, by the
"total control of Congress"​

phrase.

Let's clear that all up, shall we?
​

There is no question that Democrats had total control in the House from 2009-2011.
But legislation does not become law without the Senate.

"Total control", then, of the Senate requires 60 Democratic or Republican Senators.

On January 20th, 2009, 57 Senate seats were held by Democrats with 2 Independents (Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman) caucusing with the Democrats...which gave Democrats 59 mostly-reliable Democratic votes in the Senate, one shy of filibuster-proof "total control." Republicans held 41 seats.​

The 59 number in January, 2009 included Ted Kennedy and Al Franken. Kennedy had a seizure

during an Obama inaugural luncheon​

and never returned to vote in the Senate.....and Al Franken was

not officially seated until July 7th, 2009​

(hotly contested recount demanded by Norm Coleman.)

The real Democratic Senate seat number in January, 2009 was 55 Democrats plus 2 Independents equaling 57 Senate seats.

Then in April, 2009, Republican Senator Arlen
Specter became a Democrat​

. Kennedy was still at home, dying, and Al Franken was still not seated. Score in April, 2009....Democratic votes 58.

In May, 2009, Robert Byrd got sick and did not return to the Senate until July 21, 2009. Even though Franken was finally seated July 7, 2009 and Byrd returned on July 21.....Democrats still only had 59 votes in the Senate because Kennedy never returned, dying on August 25, 2009.
Kennedy's empty seat was
temporarily filled by Paul Kirk but not until September 24, 2009.​

The swearing in of Kirk finally gave Democrats 60 votes (at least potentially) in the Senate.

"Total control" of Congress by Democrats lasted all of 4 months.​

From September 24, 2009 through February 4, 2010...at which point Scott Brown, a Republican, was sworn in to replace Kennedy's Massachusetts seat.

Did President Obama have "total control" of Congress? Yes, for 4 entire months. And it was during that very small time window that Obamacare was passed in the Senate with 60 all-Democratic votes.
Did President Obama have "total control' of Congress during his first two years as president? Absolutely not and any assertions to the contrary.....as you can plainly see in the above chronology....is a lie.​

When Obama Had

Educate yourself.

I guess you forgot that Harry Reid assumed the leader in 2008, while Nancy(Blinkie) Pelosi assumed speaker in 2006. Shame you libtards cant remember shit. Then just like they did with the ACA, they could of done dealed all said, behind closed doors, but the ACA was too important(because liberal voters are too stupid) and got passed, then 2 years later Blinkie lost the speaker of the house to the cry baby(liberal John Boner). You guys are dumber than a box of rocks.

 

[AdvancingTime]

The State of the Union is one of disgust and anger. The President addressed a union that has grown weary of Washington's failure to deal with the serious problems our nation faces. Regardless of whether Obama puts out there a big vision, small vision, or no vision expect reality to quickly suck the air and energy out of the room. Cheap tricks like an empty chair or pointing to a special guest, "an average American" brought to Washington as a "visual prop" can only carry us so far.

When it comes to political inaction the Presidents promise for more governing by Presidential edict has stirred the blood of those on both sides of the aisle. To a divided, cynical, and polarized America the speech may be viewed more as a self-serving attempt to shape and cement his legacy rather than an effort to report where America is and the real challenges before our nation. The article below titled, "State Of The Union Is One Of Disgust And Anger" delves deeper into this subject.

Advancing Time: State Of The Union Is One Of Disgust And Anger

 

[eddiew]

Barack Hussein Obama, you are a liar. You have always been a liar.

If these proposals are so great for the middle class, then why did you wait until there was absolutely no chance of getting them passed to propose them?

Don't answer that Barack, you'll just lie. I will answer it with the truth:

The reason you didn't propose this nonsense until now is because you don't really want them to pass. You don't REALLY give a shit about the middle class, you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them. You are setting up your low information base with a big fat lie to rally behind for the POTUS race coming up.

You are the Liar-In-Chief and the worst president in the history of the US.

that may be pred ,,history will tell BUT FOR SURE the pubs are low life scum sucking dogs doing their best to bring down america for politics only

 

[Mertex]

you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them.

That's conservative logic for you......he knows the GOP won't pass anything, but somehow it is Obama's fault......bwahahaha!

 

[Mertex]

No president has ever lied as much as obozo...Bill Clinton was close...

You mean more than Booooooooooosh? How many died because of Bush's lies? Keep drinking the KoolAid.

 

[asaratis]

Barack Hussein Obama, you are a liar. You have always been a liar.

If these proposals are so great for the middle class, then why did you wait until there was absolutely no chance of getting them passed to propose them?

Don't answer that Barack, you'll just lie. I will answer it with the truth:

The reason you didn't propose this nonsense until now is because you don't really want them to pass. You don't REALLY give a shit about the middle class, you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them. You are setting up your low information base with a big fat lie to rally behind for the POTUS race coming up.

You are the Liar-In-Chief and the worst president in the history of the US.

that may be pred ,,history will tell BUT FOR SURE the pubs are low life scum sucking dogs doing their best to bring down america for politics only

Republicans are right to thwart the efforts of Obozo to completely ruin this country.

You never know what's in or attached to a bill until you read the bill and its amendments. Sometimes a bill with a good sounding title has devastating pieces hidden inside. "Affordable Health Care" comes to mind.

Obama has done his best to divide America along several lines...blacks against whites, blacks against police, haves against have nots, .... the list is long.

you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them.

That's conservative logic for you......he knows the GOP won't pass anything, but somehow it is Obama's fault......bwahahaha!

I would be skeptical of passing anything Obozo has to offer...and he certainly doesn't need to be the one to name a replacement for Scalia on the SCOTUS.

Obama has done more damage to this country than you will ever realize...because you worship his sorry ass.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

No president has ever lied as much as obozo...Bill Clinton was close...

You mean more than Booooooooooosh? How many died because of Bush's lies? Keep drinking the KoolAid.

The MSN Poll just out, seems to show what Americans think about Obama's lies.

Poll Results
Is the United States better off since Barack Obama became president?

• 29%
  Yes, better off
  
  
• 10%
  About the same
  
  
• 58%
  No, things are worse
  
  
• 3%
  I’m not sure

• I am sure there are a few liberals on this board who are in the 3%, totally clueless. Just as long as they get their drugs and free government cheese, no worries, right?

• 
  

• 
  

 

[eddiew]

Barack Hussein Obama, you are a liar. You have always been a liar.

If these proposals are so great for the middle class, then why did you wait until there was absolutely no chance of getting them passed to propose them?

Don't answer that Barack, you'll just lie. I will answer it with the truth:

The reason you didn't propose this nonsense until now is because you don't really want them to pass. You don't REALLY give a shit about the middle class, you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them. You are setting up your low information base with a big fat lie to rally behind for the POTUS race coming up.

You are the Liar-In-Chief and the worst president in the history of the US.

that may be pred ,,history will tell BUT FOR SURE the pubs are low life scum sucking dogs doing their best to bring down america for politics only

Republicans are right to thwart the efforts of Obozo to completely ruin this country.

You never know what's in or attached to a bill until you read the bill and its amendments. Sometimes a bill with a good sounding title has devastating pieces hidden inside. "Affordable Health Care" comes to mind.

Obama has done his best to divide America along several lines...blacks against whites, blacks against police, haves against have nots, .... the list is long.

you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them.

That's conservative logic for you......he knows the GOP won't pass anything, but somehow it is Obama's fault......bwahahaha!

I would be skeptical of passing anything Obozo has to offer...and he certainly doesn't need to be the one to name a replacement for Scalia on the SCOTUS.

Obama has done more damage to this country than you will ever realize...because you worship his sorry ass.

now it's obama ruining the country back a while ago it was bill clinton next year it'll be hillary ,,and when the pos gwb was selected it was gore who was going to bring us down GET IT ??you republican haters are fos

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Barack Hussein Obama, you are a liar. You have always been a liar.

If these proposals are so great for the middle class, then why did you wait until there was absolutely no chance of getting them passed to propose them?

Don't answer that Barack, you'll just lie. I will answer it with the truth:

The reason you didn't propose this nonsense until now is because you don't really want them to pass. You don't REALLY give a shit about the middle class, you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them. You are setting up your low information base with a big fat lie to rally behind for the POTUS race coming up.

You are the Liar-In-Chief and the worst president in the history of the US.

that may be pred ,,history will tell BUT FOR SURE the pubs are low life scum sucking dogs doing their best to bring down america for politics only

Republicans are right to thwart the efforts of Obozo to completely ruin this country.

You never know what's in or attached to a bill until you read the bill and its amendments. Sometimes a bill with a good sounding title has devastating pieces hidden inside. "Affordable Health Care" comes to mind.

Obama has done his best to divide America along several lines...blacks against whites, blacks against police, haves against have nots, .... the list is long.

you just know that they GOP won't pass it and so then you will be putting the blame on them.

That's conservative logic for you......he knows the GOP won't pass anything, but somehow it is Obama's fault......bwahahaha!

I would be skeptical of passing anything Obozo has to offer...and he certainly doesn't need to be the one to name a replacement for Scalia on the SCOTUS.

Obama has done more damage to this country than you will ever realize...because you worship his sorry ass.

now it's obama ruining the country back a while ago it was bill clinton next year it'll be hillary ,,and when the pos gwb was selected it was gore who was going to bring us down GET IT ??you republican haters are fos

George Bush, Sr and Jr, were both liberal Republicans, who had to increase the government, take us to wars(so did all the liberal Democrats before them) and yes, many of US voted for the lesser of two(2) evils, because Al Jazeera Gore and John F'ing Kerry(who won 3 purple hearts) were going to be worse than George. That is why John(RINO) McCain didn't get voted for, or Mitt(Romneycare) Romney didn't get voted for. America is TIRED of liberalism as they have created the mess we are dealing with(19+ Trillion Dollars of Debt) the middle east on fire, most in poverty ever, 1 in 5 US children hungry, and the RICH are definitely richer. You liberals are too stupid to see this, but Jonathan Gruber(Obamacare architect) called you for what you are.
Obamacare: Voters, are you stupid? - CNN.com

Obamacare: Liberal Voters, are you stupid?

YES YOU ARE.

 

[eddiew]

you are bonkers!! Liberalism is the cause of our ME problems?? Not the moron gwb who your repub morons voted for over Gore??,,,,,,remember ronnie tripled our debt Moron gwb only doubled it and left obama holding the republican bag of feces

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

you are bonkers!! Liberalism is the cause of our ME problems?? Not the moron gwb who your repub morons voted for over Gore??,,,,,,remember ronnie tripled our debt Moron gwb only doubled it and left obama holding the republican bag of feces

So with Obama taking the national debt from 9 trillion to 19 trillion, you don't see a problem with that? We saw a problem when GWB took the debt from 4 trillion to 9 trillion in 8 years, but Bummer has doubled down that in 7 years. You are just plain stupid as Jonathan claimed you are.