% of US slaves who were black

What percentage of US slaves were black?

  • 100 - 90

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • 89 - 50

    Votes: 6 50.0%
  • 49 - 20

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • <20

    Votes: 3 25.0%

  • Total voters
    12
All of them


I don’t want to hear any crap that indentured servants were slaves

And there you go. It all depends. You just proved my point.

It all depends upon how anal retentive you want to be. In all reality, indentured servants did not live as good as black slaves

www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/time-on-the-cross-the-economics-of-american-negro-slavery-time-on-the-cross-evidence-and-methods-a-supplement-by-robert-william/

Time on the Cross - Wikipedia

Bull Shit on toast

Indentured servants signed a legally enforceable contract for both parties. Slaves never had such a contract
Indentures servants had rights recognizable in a court of law
Indentured servants were not property
Indentured servants had a set time period of indenture
The children of indentured servants were not available to sell

Indentured servants were not slaves

That is according to your opinion. Depending upon your situation, you may not have a choice in choosing to be an indentured servant.

FACT

Indentured servants had rights recognizable in a court of law

Slaves had no more rights than farm animals

FACT

Black slaves lived better than their blue collar contemporaries

Their blue collar contemporaries were free to seek employment elsewhere
Slaves were not
 
Last edited:
And there you go. It all depends. You just proved my point.

It all depends upon how anal retentive you want to be. In all reality, indentured servants did not live as good as black slaves

www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/time-on-the-cross-the-economics-of-american-negro-slavery-time-on-the-cross-evidence-and-methods-a-supplement-by-robert-william/

Time on the Cross - Wikipedia

Bull Shit on toast

Indentured servants signed a legally enforceable contract for both parties. Slaves never had such a contract
Indentures servants had rights recognizable in a court of law
Indentured servants were not property
Indentured servants had a set time period of indenture
The children of indentured servants were not available to sell

Indentured servants were not slaves

That is according to your opinion. Depending upon your situation, you may not have a choice in choosing to be an indentured servant.

FACT

Indentured servants had rights recognizable in a court of law

Slaves had no more rights than farm animals

FACT

Black slaves lived better than their blue collar contemporaries



Their blue collar contemporaries were free to seek employment elsewhere
Slaves were nou

You keep repeating that like it's true. It's not the whole truth. The children who were kidnapped in Britain and then sold in the U.S. weren't free. Maybe they got beyond being indentured, but they still were not free.

But, it's all semantics and a detour from the original question.
 
Bull Shit on toast

Indentured servants signed a legally enforceable contract for both parties. Slaves never had such a contract
Indentures servants had rights recognizable in a court of law
Indentured servants were not property
Indentured servants had a set time period of indenture
The children of indentured servants were not available to sell

Indentured servants were not slaves

That is according to your opinion. Depending upon your situation, you may not have a choice in choosing to be an indentured servant.

FACT

Indentured servants had rights recognizable in a court of law

Slaves had no more rights than farm animals

FACT

Black slaves lived better than their blue collar contemporaries



Their blue collar contemporaries were free to seek employment elsewhere
Slaves were nou

You keep repeating that like it's true. It's not the whole truth. The children who were kidnapped in Britain and then sold in the U.S. weren't free. Maybe they got beyond being indentured, but they still were not free.

But, it's all semantics and a detour from the original question.

There were no children kidnapped in Britain and sold in the US
It was not allowed
 
That is according to your opinion. Depending upon your situation, you may not have a choice in choosing to be an indentured servant.

FACT

Indentured servants had rights recognizable in a court of law

Slaves had no more rights than farm animals

FACT

Black slaves lived better than their blue collar contemporaries



Their blue collar contemporaries were free to seek employment elsewhere
Slaves were nou

You keep repeating that like it's true. It's not the whole truth. The children who were kidnapped in Britain and then sold in the U.S. weren't free. Maybe they got beyond being indentured, but they still were not free.

But, it's all semantics and a detour from the original question.

There were no children kidnapped in Britain and sold in the US
It was not allowed

It's not allowed to sell pot in the U.S. either
 
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.


It's a FACT that jackass party of slavery supporters do not like.
 
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.

More conservative propaganda

The rightwing "plantation" rhetoric is offensive to the memory of those who actually were slaves
 
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.


It's a FACT that jackass party of slavery supporters do not like.
Yep. Southern conservatives sure sucked the big fat whazzoo.

Still do.
 
All of them


I don’t want to hear any crap that indentured servants were slaves
whats about Muscovy ?

Muscovite Serfdom - slavery or not?

soviet Kolkhoz , slavery or not?


Serfdom - Wikipedia
Kolkhoz - Wikipedia
You guys are all slaves
my people got the first constitutions in europe, whats about you?

What did your Constitution do for the serfs?
we did it for everyone
"Commonwealth adopted a massive reform effort and enacted the Constitution of May 3, 1791—the first codified constitution in modern European history and the second in modern world history (after the United States Constitution).[21][22][23][24][25]"
 
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.

More conservative propaganda

The rightwing "plantation" rhetoric is offensive to the memory of those who actually were slaves
More non citizens, and dead ones at that, you guys are on a roll.
 
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.

More conservative propaganda

The rightwing "plantation" rhetoric is offensive to the memory of those who actually were slaves
More non citizens, and dead ones at that, you guys are on a roll.
No idea what you are babbling about
 
`
Not all slaves were black, to wit;
`
`

Irish_slaves.jpg
 
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.

More conservative propaganda

The rightwing "plantation" rhetoric is offensive to the memory of those who actually were slaves
Did I say anything about a "plantation", jackass?

If you think the majority of slaves in the USA were black then you are simply ignorant of US history. As a matter of fact, the most ignominious slave driver in US history, FDR, enslaved millions of Americans and the vast majority of his victims were white.

That's a fucking fact. It's not "propaganda" and it's not "rhetoric". It's a fact.
 
Last edited:
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.


It's a FACT that jackass party of slavery supporters do not like.
Yep. Southern conservatives sure sucked the big fat whazzoo.

Still do.
FDR was not a "southern conservative", jackass.
 
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.

More conservative propaganda

The rightwing "plantation" rhetoric is offensive to the memory of those who actually were slaves
Did I say anything about a "plantation", jackass?

If you think the majority of slaves in the USA were black then you are simply ignorant of US history. As a matter of fact, the most ignominious slave driver in US history, FDR, enslaved millions of Americans and the vast majority of his victims were white.

That's a fucking fact. It's not "propaganda" and it's not "rhetoric". It's a fact.
Now you are just getting silly
 
America is the only country that considers itself civilized, but had slavery in the 19th century. In addition, racial segregation persisted until the 60s of the 20th century. And these guys will teach the whole world?
If you think that slavery in America ended in the 19th century, you're ignorant. The overwhelming majority of slaves in the USA were enslaved by Democrat presidents in the 20th century.

More conservative propaganda

The rightwing "plantation" rhetoric is offensive to the memory of those who actually were slaves
Did I say anything about a "plantation", jackass?

If you think the majority of slaves in the USA were black then you are simply ignorant of US history. As a matter of fact, the most ignominious slave driver in US history, FDR, enslaved millions of Americans and the vast majority of his victims were white.

That's a fucking fact. It's not "propaganda" and it's not "rhetoric". It's a fact.
Now you are just getting silly
You are in denial of the facts.

How many Americans do you think FDR enslaved?
 

Forum List

Back
Top