- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,435
- 142,944
- 2,615
All of them
I don’t want to hear any crap that indentured servants were slaves
And there you go. It all depends. You just proved my point.
It all depends upon how anal retentive you want to be. In all reality, indentured servants did not live as good as black slaves
www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/time-on-the-cross-the-economics-of-american-negro-slavery-time-on-the-cross-evidence-and-methods-a-supplement-by-robert-william/
Time on the Cross - Wikipedia
Bull Shit on toast
Indentured servants signed a legally enforceable contract for both parties. Slaves never had such a contract
Indentures servants had rights recognizable in a court of law
Indentured servants were not property
Indentured servants had a set time period of indenture
The children of indentured servants were not available to sell
Indentured servants were not slaves
That is according to your opinion. Depending upon your situation, you may not have a choice in choosing to be an indentured servant.
FACT
Indentured servants had rights recognizable in a court of law
Slaves had no more rights than farm animals
FACT
Black slaves lived better than their blue collar contemporaries
Their blue collar contemporaries were free to seek employment elsewhere
Slaves were not
Last edited: