Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Obama has single-handedly done more about race relations in America than was done by any one or any group in the previous 50 years.
He has poisoned the well so thoroughly that there won't be another black (or halfsie) president for at least 150 years.
The refusal of the Republican Party to deal with the first black President on any terms will condemn them in history
Revisionist history does not change thingsObamas biggest mistake was that he was naive when he took office. He thought he would be treated the same as previous presidents and would have a Congress that was, as a minimum, willing to do its job
His treatment is driven by his actions. He refused to work with congress and instead tried to dictate to them.
His failure was brought on by his own actions and his narcissism
Obama must fail was the Republican policy.
Sure, just as Bush must fail was the democrat policy. That has been the case since 1776. Are you saying the black guy deserved special treatment?
Revisionist history does not change thingsObamas biggest mistake was that he was naive when he took office. He thought he would be treated the same as previous presidents and would have a Congress that was, as a minimum, willing to do its job
His treatment is driven by his actions. He refused to work with congress and instead tried to dictate to them.
His failure was brought on by his own actions and his narcissism
Obama must fail was the Republican policy.
Sure, just as Bush must fail was the democrat policy. That has been the case since 1776. Are you saying the black guy deserved special treatment?
Obama has single-handedly done more about race relations in America than was done by any one or any group in the previous 50 years.
He has poisoned the well so thoroughly that there won't be another black (or halfsie) president for at least 150 years.
The refusal of the Republican Party to deal with the first black President on any terms will condemn them in history
LOL. thats funny
the truth is that the first black president has been a massive failure and that failure has damaged this country.
I too HOPED that obama would be able to improve race relations, he had a great opportunity to do that. But instead he did just the opposite and stirred up the tensions on both sides.
worst president in history is too mild.
Revisionist history does not change thingsObamas biggest mistake was that he was naive when he took office. He thought he would be treated the same as previous presidents and would have a Congress that was, as a minimum, willing to do its job
His treatment is driven by his actions. He refused to work with congress and instead tried to dictate to them.
His failure was brought on by his own actions and his narcissism
Obama must fail was the Republican policy.
Sure, just as Bush must fail was the democrat policy. That has been the case since 1776. Are you saying the black guy deserved special treatment?
Bush had unprecedented support from the Democrats after 9-11. He was given a 9-11 card with witch he could get any legislation he wanted in pursuit of terrorism.
He abused his authority
Obama has single-handedly done more about race relations in America than was done by any one or any group in the previous 50 years.
He has poisoned the well so thoroughly that there won't be another black (or halfsie) president for at least 150 years.
The refusal of the Republican Party to deal with the first black President on any terms will condemn them in history
LOL. thats funny
the truth is that the first black president has been a massive failure and that failure has damaged this country.
I too HOPED that obama would be able to improve race relations, he had a great opportunity to do that. But instead he did just the opposite and stirred up the tensions on both sides.
worst president in history is too mild.
You guys already tried that worst president in history shit in 2012
Nobody bought it
Obama has single-handedly done more about race relations in America than was done by any one or any group in the previous 50 years.
He has poisoned the well so thoroughly that there won't be another black (or halfsie) president for at least 150 years.
Revisionist history does not change thingsObamas biggest mistake was that he was naive when he took office. He thought he would be treated the same as previous presidents and would have a Congress that was, as a minimum, willing to do its job
His treatment is driven by his actions. He refused to work with congress and instead tried to dictate to them.
His failure was brought on by his own actions and his narcissism
Obama must fail was the Republican policy.
Sure, just as Bush must fail was the democrat policy. That has been the case since 1776. Are you saying the black guy deserved special treatment?
He has gotten special treatment. The media has carried his water for him since day one. Yet the libs STILL whine.
piss off with that bullshit. He had a D congress and D senate till 2010 and a D senate blocking legislation he wanted blocked til 2014.
Republicans refused bipartisan support on any issue and were prepared to let the economy collapse if it meant a one term ObamaRevisionist history does not change thingsObamas biggest mistake was that he was naive when he took office. He thought he would be treated the same as previous presidents and would have a Congress that was, as a minimum, willing to do its job
His treatment is driven by his actions. He refused to work with congress and instead tried to dictate to them.
His failure was brought on by his own actions and his narcissism
Obama must fail was the Republican policy.
Sure, just as Bush must fail was the democrat policy. That has been the case since 1776. Are you saying the black guy deserved special treatment?
Bush had unprecedented support from the Democrats after 9-11. He was given a 9-11 card with witch he could get any legislation he wanted in pursuit of terrorism.
He abused his authority
thats your opinion, its an opinion based on partisanship rather than logic, but you have a right to it.
Truman and Kennedy also got bipartisan support at critical times, did they abuse their authority too?
Republicans refused bipartisan support on any issue and were prepared to let the economy collapse if it meant a one term ObamaRevisionist history does not change thingsHis treatment is driven by his actions. He refused to work with congress and instead tried to dictate to them.
His failure was brought on by his own actions and his narcissism
Obama must fail was the Republican policy.
Sure, just as Bush must fail was the democrat policy. That has been the case since 1776. Are you saying the black guy deserved special treatment?
Bush had unprecedented support from the Democrats after 9-11. He was given a 9-11 card with witch he could get any legislation he wanted in pursuit of terrorism.
He abused his authority
thats your opinion, its an opinion based on partisanship rather than logic, but you have a right to it.
Truman and Kennedy also got bipartisan support at critical times, did they abuse their authority too?
When the economy collapsed under Bush, Republicans voted for TARP, stimulus and an auto bailout.......Democrats supported it for the good of the economy
Once Obama became president, they voted AGAINST the very same programs they gave Bush
Of course he has. and it was all planned. Just like Hillary meeting with the major LAMEstream medias. this media is not OUR FRIENDS anymore. people need to wake up to that
piss off with that bullshit. He had a D congress and D senate till 2010 and a D senate blocking legislation he wanted blocked til 2014.
Whether you know it or not (probably not) you actually
"answered" your own query......Indeed, a minority in congress can STILL block any legislation as it was before 2010...and as it is now much to the chagrin of the GOP who are still wasting time and funds to reject the ACA.
doing what the voters sent them to DC to do. Sorry if you don't like it, "elections have consequences"
Of course he has. and it was all planned. Just like Hillary meeting with the major LAMEstream medias. this media is not OUR FRIENDS anymore. people need to wake up to that
Thank you for openly admitting that FOX and the WSJ, Breibart and the hate-talk radio shows have NOTHING to do with media.....still, you get your "news" from them, don't you?
Republicans refused bipartisan support on any issue and were prepared to let the economy collapse if it meant a one term ObamaRevisionist history does not change things
Obama must fail was the Republican policy.
Sure, just as Bush must fail was the democrat policy. That has been the case since 1776. Are you saying the black guy deserved special treatment?
Bush had unprecedented support from the Democrats after 9-11. He was given a 9-11 card with witch he could get any legislation he wanted in pursuit of terrorism.
He abused his authority
thats your opinion, its an opinion based on partisanship rather than logic, but you have a right to it.
Truman and Kennedy also got bipartisan support at critical times, did they abuse their authority too?
When the economy collapsed under Bush, Republicans voted for TARP, stimulus and an auto bailout.......Democrats supported it for the good of the economy
Once Obama became president, they voted AGAINST the very same programs they gave Bush
all lies, is that all you do all day, lie? Are you a human being or a mechanical talking point repeater?
doing what the voters sent them to DC to do. Sorry if you don't like it, "elections have consequences"
Which means that those republicans LIED to moronic right wingers who were too dumb to understand that Obama could always veto any such attempt....Were you one of those morons who believed them?
His treatment is driven by his actions. He refused to work with congress and instead tried to dictate to them.
Republicans refused bipartisan support on any issue and were prepared to let the economy collapse if it meant a one term ObamaSure, just as Bush must fail was the democrat policy. That has been the case since 1776. Are you saying the black guy deserved special treatment?
Bush had unprecedented support from the Democrats after 9-11. He was given a 9-11 card with witch he could get any legislation he wanted in pursuit of terrorism.
He abused his authority
thats your opinion, its an opinion based on partisanship rather than logic, but you have a right to it.
Truman and Kennedy also got bipartisan support at critical times, did they abuse their authority too?
When the economy collapsed under Bush, Republicans voted for TARP, stimulus and an auto bailout.......Democrats supported it for the good of the economy
Once Obama became president, they voted AGAINST the very same programs they gave Bush
all lies, is that all you do all day, lie? Are you a human being or a mechanical talking point repeater?
Prove me wrong.....go at it
Show Republicans did not vote for TARP, auto bailouts and stimulus under Bush......then show how many would give Obama the same
His treatment is driven by his actions. He refused to work with congress and instead tried to dictate to them.
Do you happen to remember which sweethearts stated just about a week after Obama's inauguration that they would do everything possible to make him a ONE-termer?
(If you can't remember, I can help you, fish.)
