They can't get past this truism;
IF the arabs laid down their arms, there would be no violence. IF the jews laid down their arms, there would be no Israel.
Right. There would be no Israel.
And the world would be better off for it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They can't get past this truism;
IF the arabs laid down their arms, there would be no violence. IF the jews laid down their arms, there would be no Israel.
"Following is a list of United Nations Security Council resolutions directly critical of Israel for violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions, the U.N. Charter, the Geneva Conventions, international terrorism, or other violations of international law..."Tens of thousands of rockets fired INTO Israeli settlements, targeting innocent civilians.
Zero rockets fired FROM Israel, targeting innocent arab civilians
How many US civilians would die in such a cowardly attack?Not a single tear would come to my eye if Israel drops a nuke on the United Nations building, but it may come to that if Israel has to survive.
They uproot olive orchards that are hundreds of years older than the Jewish state. Is that kosher?They demolish illegal structures built without permits in Israel.
At some point, the zionists are either going to have to have a two-state solution, or they are going to have to live in a state where Jews are in the minority.
But they can't go on being an apartheid state forever.
Um, why not? And says who?
-Geaux
The American tax payer.
Check out the 18 to 29 year old age group on this chart. Eventually, when they are in control of this nation and paying the bulk of the taxes, I think they won't pay for apartheid anymore. Already the millennials I listen to think it is a war crime. Do you pay attention to what is going on at the Universities?
Yes I do, and that's a big problem.
So the 47% of Americans who pay taxes will continue to be Jewish?
Again, who gives a rip about what the taxpayers want in Israel.
But to your point, the ones you cite in the poll who are leaning towards your solution, don't pay taxes.
-Geaux
Indeed.At some point, the zionists are either going to have to have a two-state solution, or they are going to have to live in a state where Jews are in the minority.
But they can't go on being an apartheid state forever.
The choices are three:
1. Absorb the people living in Gaza and The West Bank into Israeli society.It's way past time for Israel to poop or get off the pot - this decades old war of attrition is REALLY getting old.
2. Annihilate the people living in Gaza and The West Bank.
3. Free the people living in Gaza and The West Bank to pursue their own destiny.
Cool options. But you're aware the Palestinians don't agree with any of them. You know that...right?
Hamas says the only option is to kill all the Jews. How does that mission statement fit in with your options above? Any explanation provided should be interesting.
At this point in Time, it's irrelevant what the people living in Gaza and The West Bank want. Israel is in full control of the issue and they need to pick a solution.
Nope. It is absolutely not irrelevant. You cannot have a meaningful agreement between two parties unless both parties agree.
Kinda of simple really.
If one of the parties vows as it's mission statement to exterminate the other party it's pretty tough to reach any kind of agreement. I think any clear minded person can see that.
Indeed.At some point, the zionists are either going to have to have a two-state solution, or they are going to have to live in a state where Jews are in the minority.
But they can't go on being an apartheid state forever.
The choices are three:
1. Absorb the people living in Gaza and The West Bank into Israeli society.It's way past time for Israel to poop or get off the pot - this decades old war of attrition is REALLY getting old.
2. Annihilate the people living in Gaza and The West Bank.
3. Free the people living in Gaza and The West Bank to pursue their own destiny.
Cool options. But you're aware the Palestinians don't agree with any of them. You know that...right?
Hamas says the only option is to kill all the Jews. How does that mission statement fit in with your options above? Any explanation provided should be interesting.
At this point in Time, it's irrelevant what the people living in Gaza and The West Bank want. Israel is in full control of the issue and they need to pick a solution.
Nope. It is absolutely not irrelevant. You cannot have a meaningful agreement between two parties unless both parties agree.
Kinda of simple really.
If one of the parties vows as it's mission statement to exterminate the other party it's pretty tough to reach any kind of agreement. I think any clear minded person can see that.
All true.
But in this here and this now, the Israelis have the clear upper hand militarily. The point being, they're in a position to be able to make any one of those choices and there's not a damn thing the Gazans and West Bankers could do about it, save plead with the world for help. And Israel knows that they'd get it if Israel selected door number two: Annihilate the people living in Gaza and The West Bank.
Israel is scared to death of door number one, because the world will not accept a country where some of the people are legally considered 'second class citizens', and the first election after absorbing all those Muslim voters in to a society acceptable to current world norms, will render a profound and frightening change in their government.
Although, if their constitution and laws are truly democratic, all parties current vested in the landscape will leave a proportional foot-print.
I can't help but think that early 21st Century Israel is probably not what should be held up as a 'textbook example' of a democracy.
`
They can't get past this truism;
IF the arabs laid down their arms, there would be no violence. IF the jews laid down their arms, there would be no Israel.
Right. There would be no Israel.
And the world would be better off for it.
Indeed.At some point, the zionists are either going to have to have a two-state solution, or they are going to have to live in a state where Jews are in the minority.
But they can't go on being an apartheid state forever.
The choices are three:
1. Absorb the people living in Gaza and The West Bank into Israeli society.It's way past time for Israel to poop or get off the pot - this decades old war of attrition is REALLY getting old.
2. Annihilate the people living in Gaza and The West Bank.
3. Free the people living in Gaza and The West Bank to pursue their own destiny.
And there's about to be one less.The world already accepts countries where people are considered second class citizens?
Uhhh, they held on to the Sinai just fine, and even kept it after the Yom Kippur war where Egypt tried to get it back (while fighting off 3 other countries at the same time)IF the Israelis DIDN'T show restraint, your map would be all white and no green on it.
If the Israelis DIDN'T show restraint in the "73" war, Cairo and Damascus would be part of Israel
The arabs should thank God that the Israelis DO show great restraint
Uh, no, it wouldn't. The reality is, the Zionists can't hold what htey have now. They had to give back the Sinai because they couldn't hold it. They also can't let go or keep the occuppied territories. They have the tiger by the tail. They can't keep holding on and the can't let go, either.
And there's about to be one less.The world already accepts countries where people are considered second class citizens?
For nearly 67 years.Arabs are treated like second class citizens in Israel ?
For nearly 67 years.Arabs are treated like second class citizens in Israel ?
Aren't you proud?
At some point, the zionists are either going to have to have a two-state solution, or they are going to have to live in a state where Jews are in the minority.
But they can't go on being an apartheid state forever.
Indeed.At some point, the zionists are either going to have to have a two-state solution, or they are going to have to live in a state where Jews are in the minority.
But they can't go on being an apartheid state forever.
The choices are three:
1. Absorb the people living in Gaza and The West Bank into Israeli society.It's way past time for Israel to poop or get off the pot - this decades old war of attrition is REALLY getting old.
2. Annihilate the people living in Gaza and The West Bank.
3. Free the people living in Gaza and The West Bank to pursue their own destiny.
At some point, the zionists are either going to have to have a two-state solution, or they are going to have to live in a state where Jews are in the minority.
But they can't go on being an apartheid state forever.
Um, why not? And says who?
-Geaux
The American tax payer.
Check out the 18 to 29 year old age group on this chart. Eventually, when they are in control of this nation and paying the bulk of the taxes, I think they won't pay for apartheid anymore. Already the millennials I listen to think it is a war crime. Do you pay attention to what is going on at the Universities?
The world already accepts countries where people are considered second class citizens?