- May 20, 2009
- 144,424
- 66,817
- 2,330
Which of those points is not true?
Its not a hard question. Or wouldn't be if rw's had discerning and open minds. What you're reading is just one more example of the lame ass radical right taking a really simple historical fact and turning it into a pile dog crap.
Every point is indeed true and is just a fact of history. This forum is one of the worst I've seen for this pile-on-but-don't-think-for-yourself-mentality that the right has become.
Get a friggin clue already and stop blindly following the dumbest dog in the pack.
Why does a blurb about something Obama did, belong on a page dedicated to honor a past president?
moron.
I'm not the IGNORANT "maroon" here.
He is the President of the United States. If you saw the same thing discussing, say Bush and his relationship to historical facts, you wouldn't think a thing about it because it belongs there.
Example, FDR was the first president to us TV. If that fact is mentioned in a biographical note about other presidents, does that take away from the accomplishments of those other presidents?
And the military is fighting on his behalf too
Once again, he is the President of the United States, the Commander in Chief and YES, it is true, the military legally and traditionally "fights" (serves as he commands) on his behalf.
He has been the President of the United States for 3 1/2 years and hopefully will continue to be our president for another 4 and 1/2. The right lies and lies and lies and some of you are so damn ignorant its painful to read but all your lies and ignorance won't change FACTS.
Quit working so hard to find fault. Its demeaning to the right, its embarrassing to watch, its small and nasty and petty and I know damn well I'm not the only Lib/Dem who is sick of watching the right embarrass themselves.
You must have to change your Obama kneepads at least twice a day