- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,823
- 350
Obama has never spoken ill of any Muslims, not even the terrorists. Remember when he said that they (9-11 terrorists) weren't terrorists, merely people who committed acts of terrorism? He, like many liberals, is more interested in making excuses for them than condemning the brand of violence they bring on us. Many try to say we had it coming. Those innocent people, many of whom were children, were rightfully sacrificed because of our Americans ways. Even when 4 of our people were brutally murdered and sodomized on the anniversary of 9-11, the only person Obama condemned was a filmmaker, as if the people who committed the unspeakable acts were not to blame for their own actions. I am so sick of the notion that it's up to the world to be careful what we say because mere words are considered justification for some in the Muslim world to start murdering innocent people. And many refuse to stand up to them. Political correctness is a terrorist's best friend. Why do some want to enable them by covering the truth and pandering to their unreasonable demands? Obama railed against the filmmaker while avoiding even minimal criticism of the cold-blooded killers. He sounded resentful of our freedom of speech in his comments to the U.N. I believe it's a hint of some new oppressive laws to come.
I believe Obama was instrumental in initially banning the mention of God and the refusal to acknowledge Jerusalem as Israel's capital at the DNC convention. That would have stood if not for a few media outlets reporting it. The backlash wasn't something the Obama administration wanted to deal with in an election year, so they pretended to hold a vote and changed the platform. It was such a farce. The delegates, a mix of Muslims, communists and Marxists, loudly booed the mention of God and respecting our ally, Israel. The media chose not to place any focus on the large number of Democrats refusing to attend the convention. Maybe they can't stomach the radicals who are running the show.
Obama also met with the MB at the White House. Prior to this, we had a policy in place regarding dealing with terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. Obama is the one who changed that by bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to the table. He didn't have time for Israel's Netanyahu, though. It's clear where his loyalty is, and it's not with our allies or even with us. When a person looks at a country and says that they want to fundamentally transform it, they aren't saying it's a wonderful country that needs some problems dealt with. They are saying it's a horrible country that is undesirable and needs to be turned into something else. The word "fundamentally" is the big clue here. He disapproves of the foundation this country is built on. He sees our founding fathers' vision as flawed and his ego tells him he can do better. Well, he'll like it better. Not so sure about the real Americans who value their freedom and liberty.
His support of the MB and the supposed democracy in the Middle East is a joke. He supports the Muslim Brotherhood and does so knowing full well what they are about. They are not about freedom, justice or democracy. They are dictators, and likely the most evil ones at that. Women aren't treated as well as animals. I cannot tolerate that and will never be able to get my head around the fact that so many liberals stick up for them after the sadistic way they've treated women over the years.
Obama to provide $3 Billion in support to Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt - National Finance Examiner | Examiner.com
Egypt's President-elect Morsi receives congratulatory call from President Obama
Egypt's President-elect Morsi receives congratulatory call from President Obama - National Conservative | Examiner.com
Obama has gone out of his way to show support for the Muslim Brotherhood. Now people make excuses for why he shouldn't get involved and condemn them for their oppression of women and their intention of bringing back slavery. I guess Obama is only allowed to say good things about radical Muslims, but no criticism allowed. Or is that just how he feels about them?
I believe Obama was instrumental in initially banning the mention of God and the refusal to acknowledge Jerusalem as Israel's capital at the DNC convention. That would have stood if not for a few media outlets reporting it. The backlash wasn't something the Obama administration wanted to deal with in an election year, so they pretended to hold a vote and changed the platform. It was such a farce. The delegates, a mix of Muslims, communists and Marxists, loudly booed the mention of God and respecting our ally, Israel. The media chose not to place any focus on the large number of Democrats refusing to attend the convention. Maybe they can't stomach the radicals who are running the show.
Obama also met with the MB at the White House. Prior to this, we had a policy in place regarding dealing with terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. Obama is the one who changed that by bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to the table. He didn't have time for Israel's Netanyahu, though. It's clear where his loyalty is, and it's not with our allies or even with us. When a person looks at a country and says that they want to fundamentally transform it, they aren't saying it's a wonderful country that needs some problems dealt with. They are saying it's a horrible country that is undesirable and needs to be turned into something else. The word "fundamentally" is the big clue here. He disapproves of the foundation this country is built on. He sees our founding fathers' vision as flawed and his ego tells him he can do better. Well, he'll like it better. Not so sure about the real Americans who value their freedom and liberty.
His support of the MB and the supposed democracy in the Middle East is a joke. He supports the Muslim Brotherhood and does so knowing full well what they are about. They are not about freedom, justice or democracy. They are dictators, and likely the most evil ones at that. Women aren't treated as well as animals. I cannot tolerate that and will never be able to get my head around the fact that so many liberals stick up for them after the sadistic way they've treated women over the years.
Obama to provide $3 Billion in support to Muslim Brotherhood in EgyptOne day after making a historic speech in calling for Israel to give up Jerusalem, President Obama is planning on providing $3 Billion in cash and debt forgiveness to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
On May 19th, President Obama laid out a plan to forgive Egypt of over $1 Billion in debt. This debt forgiveness is on top of the $2 Billion additional funds the Obama administration plans to provide in foreign aid to the Middle Eastern nation.
U.S. President Barack Obama intends to pledge full support of the newly forming Egyptian government, going so far as to promise forgiving some 1 billion dollars in debt the Muslim nation currently owes the United States taxpayers.
The gesture by Obama is what his administration and certain left-leaning media figures are describing as part of the “Arab Spring” – the hopeful spreading of democracy throughout the Middle East. – Socyberty.com
Obama to provide $3 Billion in support to Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt - National Finance Examiner | Examiner.com
Egypt's President-elect Morsi receives congratulatory call from President Obama
Egypt's President-elect Morsi receives congratulatory call from President Obama - National Conservative | Examiner.com
Obama has gone out of his way to show support for the Muslim Brotherhood. Now people make excuses for why he shouldn't get involved and condemn them for their oppression of women and their intention of bringing back slavery. I guess Obama is only allowed to say good things about radical Muslims, but no criticism allowed. Or is that just how he feels about them?
Last edited: