Discussion in 'Politics' started by Seawytch, Sep 10, 2012.
Bush White House Deaf to 9/11 Warnings
So we are supposed to believe the op-Ed writer because he says so.
Two, why are we supposed to believe the CIA? Weren't they the ones that told us that Iraq had WMD's?
Three, Clinton had intelligence reports on Osama and and imminent attack. From what I have gathered, there was chatter about an attack for a few years.
However, Sunday morning QBing is pretty easy for an op-Ed writer.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIpEwGmSsmM]Condoleezza Rice asserts 'Bin Laden Determined To Attack' wasn't a warning. thumpandwhip.com - YouTube[/ame]
One Bush Two Bush red Bush Blue Bush.
About sums it up.
I was just reading this on HuffPo. Damn, this is awesome!
This just further vindicates Richard Clarke.
The Out-of-Towner: While Bush vacationed, 9/11 warnings went unheard
If Romney had selected Condi Rice for VP, this NYT bombshell would have likely ended his candidacy.
More: USATODAY.com - O'Neill: Iraq planning came before 9/11
This is awesome??? What exactly is so awesome about failed intelligence leading to the deaths of thousands of Americans? You are a fucking loon.
Yeah, we need to celebrate failed intelligence, how fucking low does one have to be to be excited over the death of innocent people? Just when I thought the left couldn't get more disgusting, they get excited over people dying. What a great bunch of assholes.
Yes, it's awesome that Bush is being further exposed for the lazy, lying, vacationing, stupid asshole that he was for ignoring pre-9/11 warnings while planning to invade Iraq. Yes, this is awesome news! I'm sure the media will have plenty to say about it tomorrow.
BTW, the intelligence wasn't failed.
Seek medical attention... You are one mentally ill sick fuck.
National Security advisors get warnings everyday about all sorts of things. If somehow we get hit despite those warnings, it doesn't mean they were ignored; it just means we had a failure at some level. In every war, we lose people. We end up killing more than they get of us, but we have casualties. We're not going to stop every single threat that comes our way, although we better try damn hard.
This is not something I am going to blame Bush for. There are just too many things we politicize, and this happens on both sides of the fence. Honest to goodness, a little cooperation from both sides could go a long way in accomplishing some of the things we need to work on instead of constantly pointing fingers at each other.
Did hell freeze over? I agree with you. These reports were coming in daily over a span of a few years, the chatter was out there but no one knew when or where. The same can be said about FDR, he didn't know, intelligence was telling him something was going to happen, sometime, somewhere, how is he supposed to know either?
Hindsight is 20/20. Isn't it amazing how much easier it is to connect the dots when your looking into the past, as opposed to predicting the future. Nuts.
Two Months Before 9/11, an Urgent Warning to Rice
You should be happy about this news, after all the downfall of 9/11 is what helped usher in a democrat sweep of both houses in 2006 and the white house in 2008. Which makes you wonder just who stood to benefit most from it happening right? Oops......if there ever really is a truther conspiracy now that would be a good one right?
Separate names with a comma.