Obama is without doubt a terrible and failed president, but that is beyond the pale/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Obama is without doubt a terrible and failed president, but that is beyond the pale/
Nothing like Clinton Foamer Wulf Blitzer criticizing someone in sunny Texas from his New York High Rise ivory tower. A mongrel is a dog that has sex with all breeds, and subhuman only means he doesn't measure up. Comparing Nugent to Hitler is so ridiculous, since Hitler was the leader of the popular socialist movement known as the NAZI Party.
Ted Nugent just isn't politically correct. According to Wulf Blitzer, it's okay if Clinton harassed women his spin room proclaimed to God and everybody as being bad girls and liars, when the facts forced Clinton to pay people whose civil rights he completely disregarded, plus he admitted to lying about Jennifer Flowers, who his Spin Room called every name in the book, orchestrated by Hillary Clinton, chief mudslinger and character assassin.
If President Obama had wanted a successful administration, he would have listened to both sides and quit being such a divider of this nation.
Some people are ready to go to war over the immorality Obama's administration has congealed against American integrity in order to gain popular support in his base of dubious means.
Nugent's my favorite shit in your pants to avoid the draft, 13 year old throat fuckin, canned hunt rootin' tootin' shootin' Conservative.
He's the gift that keeps on giving.
He's everything Conservatives hold dear.
Some people may seem coarse who tell the truth, though.
"America the Beautiful" has a verse in it for Mr. Nugent, "May God thy gold refine."
Nobody's perfect.
The Nazis used this term for the Jews. Even maybe RWers will walk away.
Nope.
They'll suck it up.
Many on the right make a really damn good case for secession.
Let's give them Russia.
President Obama calls African-Americans a mongrel people
By Sam Youngman - 07/29/10 03:00 PM EDT
NEW YORK President Obama waded into the national race debate in an unlikely setting and with an unusual choice of words: telling daytime talk show hosts that African-Americans are sort of a mongrel people.
The president appeared on ABCs morning talk show The View Thursday, where he talked about the forced resignation of Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod, his experience with race and his roots.
President Obama calls African-Americans a ?mongrel people? | TheHill
The definition of mongrel as an adjective is defined as "of mixed breed, nature, or origin," according to dictionary.com.
Isn't this the second time he's said this?
Nugent's my favorite shit in your pants to avoid the draft, 13 year old throat fuckin, canned hunt rootin' tootin' shootin' Conservative.
He's the gift that keeps on giving.
He's everything Conservatives hold dear.
Anyone who wears camouflage clothes in every day life is a fucking retard.
Nugent calls Obama subhuman mongel
Some conservative is gonna complain that poopy pants draft dodger is the victim here in 5....4.....3.....
Regards from Rosie
Another despicable practitioner of dehumanism.WOW, that's breaking news from the Commie news network, (CNN)
Now our media isn't trying to STIR UP SHIT alright
Stay focused on the real things people..not this petty shit
Obama isn't a mongrel, he's a snake in the grass who lures you in with lies then he comes in for the bite
but mongrel fits too
Another despicable practitioner of dehumanism.WOW, that's breaking news from the Commie news network, (CNN)
Now our media isn't trying to STIR UP SHIT alright
Stay focused on the real things people..not this petty shit
Obama isn't a mongrel, he's a snake in the grass who lures you in with lies then he comes in for the bite
but mongrel fits too
Dehumanization | Beyond Intractability
Dehumanization
By
Michelle Maiese 

July 2003
What it Means to Dehumanize
Dehumanization is a psychological process whereby opponents view each other as less than human and thus not deserving of moral consideration. Jews in the eyes of Nazis and Tutsis in the eyes of Hutus (in the Rwandan genocide) are but two examples. Protracted conflict strains relationships and makes it difficult for parties to recognize that they are part of a shared human community. Such conditions often lead to feelings of intense hatred and alienation among conflicting parties. The more severe the conflict, the more the psychological distance between groups will widen. Eventually, this can result in moral exclusion. Those excluded are typically viewed as inferior, evil, or criminal.[1]
We typically think that all people have some basic human rights that should not be violated. Innocent people should not be murdered, raped, or tortured. Rather, international law suggests that they should be treated justly and fairly, with dignity and respect. They deserve to have their basic needs met, and to have some freedom to make autonomous decisions. In times of war, parties must take care to protect the lives of innocent civilians on the opposing side. Even those guilty of breaking the law should receive a fair trial, and should not be subject to any sort of cruel or unusual punishment.
However, for individuals viewed as outside the scope of morality and justice, "the concepts of deserving basic needs and fair treatment do not apply and can seem irrelevant."[2] Any harm that befalls such individuals seems warranted, and perhaps even morally justified. Those excluded from the scope of morality are typically perceived as psychologically distant, expendable, and deserving of treatment that would not be acceptable for those included in one's moral community. Common criteria for exclusion include ideology, skin color, and cognitive capacity. We typically dehumanize those whom we perceive as a threat to our well-being or values.[3]
Psychologically, it is necessary to categorize one's enemy as sub-human in order to legitimize increased violence or justify the violation of basic human rights. Moral exclusion reduces restraints against harming or exploiting certain groups of people. In severe cases, dehumanization makes the violation of generally accepted norms of behavior regarding one's fellow man seem reasonable, or even necessary.
the poor Obots are going to have another cow (meltdown)
man they've had a couple herds already, must hurt
LEAVE the DEAR LEADER ALONE
Some conservative is gonna complain that poopy pants draft dodger is the victim here in 5....4.....3.....
Regards from Rosie