Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You made the claim, I kicked your butt asking for evidence, and now, you ask me for evidence.You get people like kaz who made a statement that he could not back up about me, then attacked me for questioning his bold assertion without evidence.
Troll like that are dealt with sharply, then I move on.
So when I ask you to back up your shit and you don't, you're admitting you can't? Interesting. Not interesting you can't, interesting you finally admitted that
So when I ask you to back up your shit and you don't, you're admitting you can't? Interesting. Not interesting you can't, interesting you finally admitted that
I think you are great, man.
You just need to lighten up on the hostility.
You made the claim, I kicked your butt asking for evidence, and now, you ask me for evidence.You get people like kaz who made a statement that he could not back up about me, then attacked me for questioning his bold assertion without evidence.
Troll like that are dealt with sharply, then I move on.
So when I ask you to back up your shit and you don't, you're admitting you can't? Interesting. Not interesting you can't, interesting you finally admitted that
kaz, I did not realize you were that stupid.
The hard right cons were using the neg rep to punish and drive away their opponents.
Stats figured out how to use the system against them, and we broke the hard right.
The mods then, on suggestion, took away the neg rep, and the hard right has been crying ever since.
There actually is more debate now and while there is much whining, it is less than before.
Doesn't matter if you do or don't.bluegin, you far righties were the worst by far; for every TM there were a dozen of you. You know it, we put it down. Period.BS some of the biggest rep abusers on this board were left wing moonbats and their socks.The hard right cons were using the neg rep to punish and drive away their opponents.
Stats figured out how to use the system against them, and we broke the hard right.
The mods then, on suggestion, took away the neg rep, and the hard right has been crying ever since.
There actually is more debate now and while there is much whining, it is less than before.
I'm a lefty, but without documentation, I can't support this assertion .
I was talking about something to use for empty and pointless posts, which is a little different than a "you suck!" rating.
I do not like negative ratings, because they are non-constructive and used to bully dissenters into silence. It does not appeal to me, because the tactic actually works on a lot of people, and I am trying to get across alternative views. Hard to have a discussion when everyone around you is scared of speaking.
Of course, that is kind of already the case. There are terror gangs on both sides that jump on you with tons of attacks, but I could almost get over that if they made substantive arguments and contributed to the discussion rather than using their petty loser tactics.
The hard right cons were using the neg rep to punish and drive away their opponents.
Stats figured out how to use the system against them, and we broke the hard right.
The mods then, on suggestion, took away the neg rep, and the hard right has been crying ever since.
There actually is more debate now and while there is much whining, it is less than before.
I don't have to rebut anything if you have made if it is an unevidenced assertion.You made the claim, I kicked your butt asking for evidence, and now, you ask me for evidence.You get people like kaz who made a statement that he could not back up about me, then attacked me for questioning his bold assertion without evidence.
Troll like that are dealt with sharply, then I move on.
So when I ask you to back up your shit and you don't, you're admitting you can't? Interesting. Not interesting you can't, interesting you finally admitted that
kaz, I did not realize you were that stupid.
Got it. So when you make a claim and I ask you to back up your shit and you don't, you're "admitting you can't."
I don't deny it, but for every 1 TM there were 12 rebs.The hard right cons were using the neg rep to punish and drive away their opponents.
Stats figured out how to use the system against them, and we broke the hard right.
The mods then, on suggestion, took away the neg rep, and the hard right has been crying ever since.
There actually is more debate now and while there is much whining, it is less than before.
Don't act like it wasn't a two way street. Both sides abused it.
I don't deny it, but for every 1 TM there were 12 rebs.The hard right cons were using the neg rep to punish and drive away their opponents.
Stats figured out how to use the system against them, and we broke the hard right.
The mods then, on suggestion, took away the neg rep, and the hard right has been crying ever since.
There actually is more debate now and while there is much whining, it is less than before.
Don't act like it wasn't a two way street. Both sides abused it.
They are not interested in constructive discussion, only punishing those they don't like.
Publish in the CDZ forum, if you want to eliminate the nonsense. Someone who acts up can be put on vacation by a mod.
The Conspiracy Theories forum needs a CDZ forum of its own. Pretty sure conspiracy theories aren't allowed in the CDZ.
I don't see very many conspiracy theories being moved out of the politics section
Why is this in A&F? The first three paragraphs are personal flaming.80% of this site does not actually debate. They just insult you, meander, and resort to a variety of other petty debating tactics.
I usually get called an idiot (a very unoriginal insult) and my arguments get deflected, and then everyone starts ganging up and doing the same thing.
Go ahead and insult all you want, but at least give me something to respond to rather than forcing me to walk away or get involved in a flame war.
Wouldn't a "no substance" rating be wonderful? Something you could use on people who do not bring up any actual points of discussion in their post.
Why is this in A&F? The first three paragraphs are personal flaming.
That content does NOT belong here. The 4th paragraph is a request so yes it could.
Nope, but for the old timers on the board, common knowledge reaffirms it.I don't deny it, but for every 1 TM there were 12 rebs.The hard right cons were using the neg rep to punish and drive away their opponents.
Stats figured out how to use the system against them, and we broke the hard right.
The mods then, on suggestion, took away the neg rep, and the hard right has been crying ever since.
There actually is more debate now and while there is much whining, it is less than before.
Don't act like it wasn't a two way street. Both sides abused it.
Can you back up that assertion ;-)?
It is disconcerting that on every internet forum, I only find a minority of individuals willing to hold a discussion.
And it never occurred to you that maybe the problem is YOU?
You and one other having recently joined here seem to be bent on attaining some power. The other wanted a civilian ruling class as a buffer between staff and members and BOTH sides shot that down.And it never occurred to you that maybe the problem is YOU?
Please don't lecture me.
My interactions with you have been less than desirable. You ask me a series of several questions, and then give an uninspired insult at the end of your interrogation.