No justice for Kate Steinle's family

[theDoctorisIn]

They hate white people.

You are dodging the question sweetie....

Nuff said...
Democrats vote to defend sanctuary cities, block mandatory jail time for repeat illegals

You got that right. Maybe the Steinle family can file a wrongful death suit against San Francisco for letting an illegal on the street with his prior criminal record.

They can't.

Legislatures can't be held liable for consequences of laws they pass.

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

 

[WillowTree]

Funny! Innit. Libtards did not scream double jeopardy when Zimmerman was adjudicated not guilty. They wanted the feds to charge him with murder and a hate crime. By gosh the hypocrisy is astounding. If Kate Steinle was a black they would be howling for justice.

 

[eagle7_31]

You are dodging the question sweetie....

Nuff said...
Democrats vote to defend sanctuary cities, block mandatory jail time for repeat illegals

You got that right. Maybe the Steinle family can file a wrongful death suit against San Francisco for letting an illegal on the street with his prior criminal record.

They can't.

Legislatures can't be held liable for consequences of laws they pass.

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Nuff said...
Democrats vote to defend sanctuary cities, block mandatory jail time for repeat illegals

You got that right. Maybe the Steinle family can file a wrongful death suit against San Francisco for letting an illegal on the street with his prior criminal record.

They can't.

Legislatures can't be held liable for consequences of laws they pass.

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

 

[Bush92]

You got that right. Maybe the Steinle family can file a wrongful death suit against San Francisco for letting an illegal on the street with his prior criminal record.

They can't.

Legislatures can't be held liable for consequences of laws they pass.

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

San Francisco is the biggest piece of shit, drug bum infested, city in the nation.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

They can't.

Legislatures can't be held liable for consequences of laws they pass.

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

San Francisco is the biggest piece of shit, drug bum infested, city in the nation.

You've made it clear you don't like San Francisco.


But I don't give a flying fuck about your feelings.

 

[Bush92]

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

San Francisco is the biggest piece of shit, drug bum infested, city in the nation.

You've made it clear you don't like San Francisco.


But I don't give a flying fuck about your feelings.

San Francisco is a detriment to the United States of America.

 

[Bush92]

San Francisco has heroin addicts shitting on the streets.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

San Francisco is the biggest piece of shit, drug bum infested, city in the nation.

You've made it clear you don't like San Francisco.


But I don't give a flying fuck about your feelings.

San Francisco is a detriment to the United States of America.

...ok.

So what?

 

[WillowTree]

You got that right. Maybe the Steinle family can file a wrongful death suit against San Francisco for letting an illegal on the street with his prior criminal record.

They can't.

Legislatures can't be held liable for consequences of laws they pass.

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

Which makes them guilty of Kate Steinle’s murder. They had the power to protect her but they chose to protect a 7x felon, 5x illegal entry into the US.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

They can't.

Legislatures can't be held liable for consequences of laws they pass.

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

Which makes them guilty of Kate Steinle’s murder. They had the power to protect her but they chose to protect a 7x felon, 5x illegal entry into the US.

No, it doesn't. It may make you feel like they're guilty.

But as I told Bush, no one gives a fuck about your feelings.

 

[WillowTree]

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

Which makes them guilty of Kate Steinle’s murder. They had the power to protect her but they chose to protect a 7x felon, 5x illegal entry into the US.

No, it doesn't. It may make you feel like they're guilty.

But as I told Bush, no one gives a fuck about your feelings.

So what? Dew ewe think I give a flying fuck if ewe care about my feelings? After all, ewe are a libtard.

 

[WillowTree]

 

[WillowTree]

The San Francisco officials did not uphold their oath of office. They should go to prison.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The San Francisco officials did not uphold their oath of office. They should go to prison.

Feeeeeeelings....wo-o-o

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

Which makes them guilty of Kate Steinle’s murder. They had the power to protect her but they chose to protect a 7x felon, 5x illegal entry into the US.

No, it doesn't. It may make you feel like they're guilty.

But as I told Bush, no one gives a fuck about your feelings.

So what? Dew ewe think I give a flying fuck if ewe care about my feelings? After all, ewe are a libtard.

You seem upset.

 

[miketx]

What’s sickening is the right’s ignorance, hate, bigotry, and contempt for the rule of law.

What a pos.

 

[miketx]

The San Francisco officials did not uphold their oath of office. They should go to prison.

Feeeeeeelings....wo-o-o

Laughing about a murderer getting off, You are a pos.

 

[Bush92]

They can't.

Legislatures can't be held liable for consequences of laws they pass.

They broke the law, there's no doubt of that. Sanctuary cities are illegal and allowing illegals to walk free after arrest is a policy, not law.

The City of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed its "sanctuary city" laws in 1989 and 2013.

They cannot be held liable for doing so, just like Congress can't be sued for any laws they pass.

San Francisco's authorties REFUSED to hand over this person to the feds violating federal immigration laws. So there very well could be grounds for a civil suit.

San Francisco's authorities refused to hand over this person to the feds because it was against San Francisco law for them to do so.

Any civil suit against the city would be thrown out.

Which makes them guilty of Kate Steinle’s murder. They had the power to protect her but they chose to protect a 7x felon, 5x illegal entry into the US.

Exactly. Democrats have blood on their hands.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

What’s sickening is the right’s ignorance, hate, bigotry, and contempt for the rule of law.

The rule of law states that this illegal alien shouldn't have been in the country to kill a young women.