US attorney says government will seek federal charges against Kate Steinle's killer

[Deplorable Yankee]

I think its racist to call her murdered
She was culturally enriched by progressive morons and their uni party globo homo open border masters

 

[EvilCat Breath]

US gun laws say that a felon with a gun goes to prison. San Francisco says an illegal alien can do what ever They want .

It has been like this for decades. In 1986 San Francisco protected illegal alien Edwin Ramos and he was allowed to murder three members of the Bologna family. Gavin Newsom was mayor then. He has always protected the illegals.

 

[danielpalos]

The left wing court of Kalipornia through out the murders only conviction BUT TRUMP made Kate a national figure against these rapists, robbers, and murders from South of the. Border and HE will not stand for the INJUSTICE that one liberal judge did!

Following the overturned state firearm conviction of illegal immigrant Jose Inez Garcia-Zarate, U.S. Attorney David Anderson said Wednesday the federal government plans to proceed with federal gun charges in the case of Kate Steinle, during an interview on "Fox & Friends."

Zarate, who was previously deported five times, was charged by the state of California with the murder of Steinle in 2015 and was acquitted on charges of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, and assault with a semi-automatic weapon. He was, however, convicted of felony possession of a firearm, and has maintained the stolen gun he used had discharged in his hands accidentally.

That gun conviction was overturned by a California state appeals court last week, causing the federal government to exercise its option to seek a federal indictment.

"The case is set for trial in our federal courthouse in San Francisco in January of 2020," Anderson told Fox News on Wednesday. "The case is now proceeding through the pretrial proceedings towards that trial date."

"In the federal court we've brought this case on the basis of a statute passed by Congress many years ago that prohibits certain categories of people from possessing any firearms," he added. "If you’re someone who has no lawful status in the United States -- if you’re here without any right to be here, you cannot possess a firearm."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

Why is there no murder conviction?

Garcia-Zarate said he unwittingly picked up the gun wrapped in a T-shirt, and it fired accidentally. The bullet ricocheted off a concrete walkway and struck Steinle, who was with her father and a family friend.

 

[The Purge]

The left wing court of Kalipornia through out the murders only conviction BUT TRUMP made Kate a national figure against these rapists, robbers, and murders from South of the. Border and HE will not stand for the INJUSTICE that one liberal judge did!

Following the overturned state firearm conviction of illegal immigrant Jose Inez Garcia-Zarate, U.S. Attorney David Anderson said Wednesday the federal government plans to proceed with federal gun charges in the case of Kate Steinle, during an interview on "Fox & Friends."

Zarate, who was previously deported five times, was charged by the state of California with the murder of Steinle in 2015 and was acquitted on charges of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, and assault with a semi-automatic weapon. He was, however, convicted of felony possession of a firearm, and has maintained the stolen gun he used had discharged in his hands accidentally.

That gun conviction was overturned by a California state appeals court last week, causing the federal government to exercise its option to seek a federal indictment.

"The case is set for trial in our federal courthouse in San Francisco in January of 2020," Anderson told Fox News on Wednesday. "The case is now proceeding through the pretrial proceedings towards that trial date."

"In the federal court we've brought this case on the basis of a statute passed by Congress many years ago that prohibits certain categories of people from possessing any firearms," he added. "If you’re someone who has no lawful status in the United States -- if you’re here without any right to be here, you cannot possess a firearm."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

Why is there no murder conviction?

Garcia-Zarate said he unwittingly picked up the gun wrapped in a T-shirt, and it fired accidentally. The bullet ricocheted off a concrete walkway and struck Steinle, who was with her father and a family friend.

It was in Kalipornia....ALL ILLEGALS walk in a Sanctuary state!

 

[Care4all]

If he fired indiscriminately into a crowd of people as I've read, there must be serious consequences. It doesn't matter his intentions, it was reckless and had a high possibility of maiming, paralyzing or killing someone.

He found the gun in a paper bag left on a pier, picked up the brown paper bag and was climbing on Jetty with it to find a place to check it out.

He slipped, the gun fell on to a rock on the jetty, and it went off.

Killing a bystander.

I think they found no gun residue on him, that's why the jury believed him?

Wonder who left the gun on the pier?

 

[bodecea]

U.S. gun laws will let him walk. The NRA's made sure of that.

Lying bastard! The NRA has supported mandatory prison time for using guns in crime. The filthy lib scum rejects it every time!

Chicago PD Made 53 Weekend Felony Gun Arrests, Judges Let Them Out Of Jail - Blue Lives Matter

^^Show how the NRA is responsible for this, liar!

Helping flood the nation with unknown hundreds of millions of firearms. Too easy. Maybe you'll do better with your next try.

You're an idiot. The NRA doesn't sell firearms. Do they have a store? Can you buy them from the NRA through the internet or mail order?

Quit being an idiot.

Sure they don't....*wink *wink

 

[shockedcanadian]

If he fired indiscriminately into a crowd of people as I've read, there must be serious consequences. It doesn't matter his intentions, it was reckless and had a high possibility of maiming, paralyzing or killing someone.

He found the gun in a paper bag left on a pier, picked up the brown paper bag and was climbing on Jetty with it to find a place to check it out.

He slipped, the gun fell on to a rock on the jetty, and it went off.

Killing a bystander.

I think they found no gun residue on him, that's why the jury believed him?

Wonder who left the gun on the pier?

Is there video evidence of this, and does it fit all the rest of the facts? Did it fire just once, was he involved in any gang activity etc?

I would need to know the facts in greater detail, it does seem like an odd situation.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

US gun laws say that a felon with a gun goes to prison. San Francisco says an illegal alien can do what ever They want .

It has been like this for decades. In 1986 San Francisco protected illegal alien Edwin Ramos and he was allowed to murder three members of the Bologna family. Gavin Newsom was mayor then. He has always protected the illegals.

Illegal Alien Murderer Had Murdered Before
San Francisco shielding a murderer from deportation enabling him to kill an innocent San Francisco family.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

He found the gun in a paper bag left on a pier, picked up the brown paper bag and was climbing on Jetty with it to find a place to check it out.
He slipped, the gun fell on to a rock on the jetty, and it went off.
Killing a bystander.
I think they found no gun residue on him, that's why the jury believed him?
Wonder who left the gun on the pier?

And if a US citizen just happened to "find" a gun in a paper bag, and was just going to "check it out", but dropped it and the bullet just happened to
hit and kill an innocent bystander.........

What chance do you think the US citizen would have of having ALL charges dropped?
At the VERY LEAST they'd still most likely be convicted of involuntary manslaughter.

It seems clear this was another case of Mexifornia protecting it's protected class.
California has seceded from the Union long ago.......no one wants to call it like it is.

No doubt if the pseudo Communists could pledge allegiance to China, Russia or Mexico and exclude the USA from it's industries it would.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

He found the gun in a paper bag left on a pier, picked up the brown paper bag and was climbing on Jetty with it to find a place to check it out.

He slipped, the gun fell on to a rock on the jetty, and it went off.

Killing a bystander.

I think they found no gun residue on him, that's why the jury believed him?

Wonder who left the gun on the pier?

Who says this gun, stolen from a BLM vehicle days earlier in SF, was just laying under a bench in a very popular and heavily visited tourist trap? A convicted felon? Right....
If you take at face value the story offered by a five time deportee, felon heroin dealer with a murder charge pending against him then I have to in all honesty say you can't be believed in anything you say, ever.
As for the gunpowder residue, you are wrong. Zarate had gunshot residue on his hands -- one tiny particle | 48 hills

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

U.S. gun laws will let him walk. The NRA's made sure of that.

It's you LEFTIST letting these criminals walk.
Nobody's buying your nonsense anymore.

 

[danielpalos]

The left wing court of Kalipornia through out the murders only conviction BUT TRUMP made Kate a national figure against these rapists, robbers, and murders from South of the. Border and HE will not stand for the INJUSTICE that one liberal judge did!

Following the overturned state firearm conviction of illegal immigrant Jose Inez Garcia-Zarate, U.S. Attorney David Anderson said Wednesday the federal government plans to proceed with federal gun charges in the case of Kate Steinle, during an interview on "Fox & Friends."

Zarate, who was previously deported five times, was charged by the state of California with the murder of Steinle in 2015 and was acquitted on charges of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, and assault with a semi-automatic weapon. He was, however, convicted of felony possession of a firearm, and has maintained the stolen gun he used had discharged in his hands accidentally.

That gun conviction was overturned by a California state appeals court last week, causing the federal government to exercise its option to seek a federal indictment.

"The case is set for trial in our federal courthouse in San Francisco in January of 2020," Anderson told Fox News on Wednesday. "The case is now proceeding through the pretrial proceedings towards that trial date."

"In the federal court we've brought this case on the basis of a statute passed by Congress many years ago that prohibits certain categories of people from possessing any firearms," he added. "If you’re someone who has no lawful status in the United States -- if you’re here without any right to be here, you cannot possess a firearm."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

Why is there no murder conviction?

Garcia-Zarate said he unwittingly picked up the gun wrapped in a T-shirt, and it fired accidentally. The bullet ricocheted off a concrete walkway and struck Steinle, who was with her father and a family friend.

It was in Kalipornia....ALL ILLEGALS walk in a Sanctuary state!

Justice is supposed to be just not vindictive.

 

[danielpalos]

US gun laws say that a felon with a gun goes to prison. San Francisco says an illegal alien can do what ever They want .

It has been like this for decades. In 1986 San Francisco protected illegal alien Edwin Ramos and he was allowed to murder three members of the Bologna family. Gavin Newsom was mayor then. He has always protected the illegals.

Illegal Alien Murderer Had Murdered Before
San Francisco shielding a murderer from deportation enabling him to kill an innocent San Francisco family.

I guess that policy will be changing due to all of the gun violence.

First degree gun lovers should go first.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Justice is supposed to be just not vindictive.

So full of shit! Katie Steinle still has not received her justice. Now that the US Justice Dept. has taken things out of the hands of the corrupt biased SF courts she just may get that justice you want to deny her.

January 2020 in a federal courtroom in San Francisco can't come soon enough for Katie Steinle and her family.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Justice is supposed to be just not vindictive.

So full of shit! Katie Steinle still has not received her justice. Now that the US Justice Dept. has taken things out of the hands of the corrupt biased SF courts she just may get that justice you want to deny her.

This is the same local government that has declared the NRA a TERRORIST organization! Something needs to be done with this state.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

U.S. gun laws will let him walk. The NRA's made sure of that.

It's you LEFTIST letting these criminals walk.
Nobody's buying your nonsense anymore.

Ironically......the criminals they release are wreaking havoc on people in their own towns.
Let's call it "Darwinian Poetic Social Justice"

And they keep proving they deserve it because they keep on voting for those policies.

 

[Care4all]

If he fired indiscriminately into a crowd of people as I've read, there must be serious consequences. It doesn't matter his intentions, it was reckless and had a high possibility of maiming, paralyzing or killing someone.

He found the gun in a paper bag left on a pier, picked up the brown paper bag and was climbing on Jetty with it to find a place to check it out.

He slipped, the gun fell on to a rock on the jetty, and it went off.

Killing a bystander.

I think they found no gun residue on him, that's why the jury believed him?

Wonder who left the gun on the pier?

Is there video evidence of this, and does it fit all the rest of the facts? Did it fire just once, was he involved in any gang activity etc?

I would need to know the facts in greater detail, it does seem like an odd situation.

All good questions....!

we can find out by reading the transcript of the trial....

let me do some hunting for it later... if I find it, I will post the link...

heading to the beach with the hubby soon, so it will be later tonight.

 

[Care4all]

Justice is supposed to be just not vindictive.

So full of shit! Katie Steinle still has not received her justice. Now that the US Justice Dept. has taken things out of the hands of the corrupt biased SF courts she just may get that justice you want to deny her.

January 2020 in a federal courtroom in San Francisco can't come soon enough for Katie Steinle and her family.

the federal charge, is having or owning a gun while here illegally... not much so called justice...

and since he didn't own the gun, and had just 'found it', then the Fed is likely wasting time and money, with the charge.... he'll likely get off...

 

[Care4all]

He found the gun in a paper bag left on a pier, picked up the brown paper bag and was climbing on Jetty with it to find a place to check it out.
He slipped, the gun fell on to a rock on the jetty, and it went off.
Killing a bystander.
I think they found no gun residue on him, that's why the jury believed him?
Wonder who left the gun on the pier?

And if a US citizen just happened to "find" a gun in a paper bag, and was just going to "check it out", but dropped it and the bullet just happened to
hit and kill an innocent bystander.........

What chance do you think the US citizen would have of having ALL charges dropped?
At the VERY LEAST they'd still most likely be convicted of involuntary manslaughter.

It seems clear this was another case of Mexifornia protecting it's protected class.
California has seceded from the Union long ago.......no one wants to call it like it is.

No doubt if the pseudo Communists could pledge allegiance to China, Russia or Mexico and exclude the USA from it's industries it would.

were the charges dropped? I thought a jury found him innocent of murder?
ok, I definitely need to find some more factual information....

was it a grand jury that dropped charges or recommended such?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

the federal charge, is having or owning a gun while here illegally... not much so called justice...

Quite a lot of justice actually for the Steinles if it puts away this five time deported heroin dealer. Of course from your perspective I can see justice is only applicable if this piece of filth gets away with murder, literally.

and since he didn't own the gun, and had just 'found it', then the Fed is likely wasting time and money, with the charge.... he'll likely get off...

That's his story, anyway. In possession of a stolen BLM pistol and gunpowder residue on his hand. Yeah....he just "found" the gun and then it just went off, somehow and he swears he never touched the weapon
but the test for nitrate residue tells another story.

What do you gain by backing this piece of shit? Besides personal satisfaction, I mean.