No climate models model a rotating spherical Earth - WRONG

OohPooPahDoo

OohPooPahDoo

Gold Member
May 11, 2011
15,347
985
175
N'Awlins Mid-City
I just thought I'd put this one to rest.

Moron deniers often make the claim that no GCM's model the Earth as a rotating sphere. THey are wrong.
SUBROUTINE GEOM 401.
C**** CALCULATE SPHERICAL GEOMETRY (for 4x5 or 7.8x10) 402.
C**** This is as in Model II'
INCLUDE 'BA94jalC9.COM'
COMMON U,V,T,P,Q 403.
DATA EDPERD/1./,EDPERY/365./ 404.
405.
LAT(1) = -.25*TWOPI 406.
LAT(JM) = -LAT(1) 407.
SINP(1) = -1. 408.
SINP(JM) = 1. 409.
COSP(1) = 0. 410.
COSP(JM) = 0. 411.
DXP(1) = 0. 412.
DXP(JM) = 0. 413.
FJEQ = .5*(1+JM) 414.
DO 620 J=2,JM-1 415.
LAT(J) = DLAT*(J-FJEQ) 416.
SINP(J) = SIN(LAT(J)) 417.
COSP(J) = COS(LAT(J)) 418.
620 DXP(J) = RADIUS*DLON*COSP(J) 419.
DO 640 J=2,JM 420.
COSV(J) = .5*(COSP(J-1)+COSP(J)) 421.
DXV(J) = .5*(DXP(J-1)+DXP(J)) 422.
640 DYV(J) = RADIUS*(LAT(J)-LAT(J-1)) 423.
DYP(1) = .5*DYV(2) 424.
DYP(JM) = .5*DYV(JM) 425.
DXYP(1) = .5*DXV(2)*DYP(1) 426.
DXYP(JM)= .5*DXV(JM)*DYP(JM) 427.
DXYS(1) = 0. 428.
DXYS(JM) = DXYP(JM) 429.
DXYN(1) = DXYP(1) 430.
DXYN(JM) = 0. 431.
AREAG = DXYP(1)+DXYP(JM) 432.
DO 660 J=2,JM-1 433.
DYP(J) = .5*(DYV(J)+DYV(J+1)) 434.
DXYP(J) = .5*(DXV(J)+DXV(J+1))*DYP(J) 435.
DXYS(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 436.
DXYN(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 437.
660 AREAG = AREAG+DXYP(J) 438.
AREAG = AREAG*FIM 439.
RAVPS(1) = 0. 440.
RAVPN(JM) = 0. 441.
DO 680 J=2,JM 442.
DXYV(J) = DXYN(J-1)+DXYS(J) 443.
RAPVS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYV(J) 444.
RAPVN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYV(J) 445.
RAVPS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYP(J) 446.
680 RAVPN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYP(J-1) 447.
C**** CALCULATE CORIOLIS PARAMETER 448.
OMEGA = TWOPI*(EDPERD+EDPERY)/(EDPERD*EDPERY*SDAY) 449.
F(1) = -RADIUS*OMEGA*.5*COSP(2)*DXV(2) 450.
F(JM) = -F(1) 451.
DO 690 J=2,JM-1 452.
690 F(J) = OMEGA*(DXV(J)*DXV(J)-DXV(J+1)*DXV(J+1))/DLON 453.
CLAT_DG latitude of mid points of primary and sec. grid boxs (deg)
C**** latitudinal spacing depends on whether you have even spacing or
C**** a partial box at the pole
DLAT_DG=180./(JM-1) ! 1/2 box at pole for 4x5 and 7.8x10
C**** LATITUDES (degrees); used extensively in the diagn. print routines
LAT_DG(1,1)=-90.
LAT_DG(1,2)=-90.
LAT_DG(JM,1)=90.
DO J=2,JM-1
LAT_DG(J,1)=DLAT_DG*(J-FJEQ) ! primary (tracer) latitudes
END DO
DO J=2,JM
LAT_DG(J,2)=DLAT_DG*(J-JM/2-1) ! secondary (velocity) latitudes
END DO
RETURN 454.
END 455.
Click to expand...


The terms "spherical" and "coriolis" should give you a hint.

http://edgcm.columbia.edu/ModelII/modelII_source.zip
 
And yet, it still has the entire surface of the earth being bathed in a weak twilight 24 hours a day...no day/night differentation. All you prove is that the models don't reproduce anything like reality which is why they are constantly wrong and require constant updating to produce anything even resembling observation.
 
OohPooPahDoo said:
I just thought I'd put this one to rest.

Moron deniers often make the claim that no GCM's model the Earth as a rotating sphere. THey are wrong.
SUBROUTINE GEOM 401.
C**** CALCULATE SPHERICAL GEOMETRY (for 4x5 or 7.8x10) 402.
C**** This is as in Model II'
INCLUDE 'BA94jalC9.COM'
COMMON U,V,T,P,Q 403.
DATA EDPERD/1./,EDPERY/365./ 404.
405.
LAT(1) = -.25*TWOPI 406.
LAT(JM) = -LAT(1) 407.
SINP(1) = -1. 408.
SINP(JM) = 1. 409.
COSP(1) = 0. 410.
COSP(JM) = 0. 411.
DXP(1) = 0. 412.
DXP(JM) = 0. 413.
FJEQ = .5*(1+JM) 414.
DO 620 J=2,JM-1 415.
LAT(J) = DLAT*(J-FJEQ) 416.
SINP(J) = SIN(LAT(J)) 417.
COSP(J) = COS(LAT(J)) 418.
620 DXP(J) = RADIUS*DLON*COSP(J) 419.
DO 640 J=2,JM 420.
COSV(J) = .5*(COSP(J-1)+COSP(J)) 421.
DXV(J) = .5*(DXP(J-1)+DXP(J)) 422.
640 DYV(J) = RADIUS*(LAT(J)-LAT(J-1)) 423.
DYP(1) = .5*DYV(2) 424.
DYP(JM) = .5*DYV(JM) 425.
DXYP(1) = .5*DXV(2)*DYP(1) 426.
DXYP(JM)= .5*DXV(JM)*DYP(JM) 427.
DXYS(1) = 0. 428.
DXYS(JM) = DXYP(JM) 429.
DXYN(1) = DXYP(1) 430.
DXYN(JM) = 0. 431.
AREAG = DXYP(1)+DXYP(JM) 432.
DO 660 J=2,JM-1 433.
DYP(J) = .5*(DYV(J)+DYV(J+1)) 434.
DXYP(J) = .5*(DXV(J)+DXV(J+1))*DYP(J) 435.
DXYS(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 436.
DXYN(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 437.
660 AREAG = AREAG+DXYP(J) 438.
AREAG = AREAG*FIM 439.
RAVPS(1) = 0. 440.
RAVPN(JM) = 0. 441.
DO 680 J=2,JM 442.
DXYV(J) = DXYN(J-1)+DXYS(J) 443.
RAPVS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYV(J) 444.
RAPVN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYV(J) 445.
RAVPS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYP(J) 446.
680 RAVPN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYP(J-1) 447.
C**** CALCULATE CORIOLIS PARAMETER 448.
OMEGA = TWOPI*(EDPERD+EDPERY)/(EDPERD*EDPERY*SDAY) 449.
F(1) = -RADIUS*OMEGA*.5*COSP(2)*DXV(2) 450.
F(JM) = -F(1) 451.
DO 690 J=2,JM-1 452.
690 F(J) = OMEGA*(DXV(J)*DXV(J)-DXV(J+1)*DXV(J+1))/DLON 453.
CLAT_DG latitude of mid points of primary and sec. grid boxs (deg)
C**** latitudinal spacing depends on whether you have even spacing or
C**** a partial box at the pole
DLAT_DG=180./(JM-1) ! 1/2 box at pole for 4x5 and 7.8x10
C**** LATITUDES (degrees); used extensively in the diagn. print routines
LAT_DG(1,1)=-90.
LAT_DG(1,2)=-90.
LAT_DG(JM,1)=90.
DO J=2,JM-1
LAT_DG(J,1)=DLAT_DG*(J-FJEQ) ! primary (tracer) latitudes
END DO
DO J=2,JM
LAT_DG(J,2)=DLAT_DG*(J-JM/2-1) ! secondary (velocity) latitudes
END DO
RETURN 454.
END 455.
Click to expand...


The terms "spherical" and "coriolis" should give you a hint.

http://edgcm.columbia.edu/ModelII/modelII_source.zip
Click to expand...

mann_treering.jpg


"You tell 'em, peckerwood! Earth is as round as this tree ring"
 
OohPooPahDoo said:
I just thought I'd put this one to rest.

Moron deniers often make the claim that no GCM's model the Earth as a rotating sphere. THey are wrong.
SUBROUTINE GEOM 401.
C**** CALCULATE SPHERICAL GEOMETRY (for 4x5 or 7.8x10) 402.
C**** This is as in Model II'
INCLUDE 'BA94jalC9.COM'
COMMON U,V,T,P,Q 403.
DATA EDPERD/1./,EDPERY/365./ 404.
405.
LAT(1) = -.25*TWOPI 406.
LAT(JM) = -LAT(1) 407.
SINP(1) = -1. 408.
SINP(JM) = 1. 409.
COSP(1) = 0. 410.
COSP(JM) = 0. 411.
DXP(1) = 0. 412.
DXP(JM) = 0. 413.
FJEQ = .5*(1+JM) 414.
DO 620 J=2,JM-1 415.
LAT(J) = DLAT*(J-FJEQ) 416.
SINP(J) = SIN(LAT(J)) 417.
COSP(J) = COS(LAT(J)) 418.
620 DXP(J) = RADIUS*DLON*COSP(J) 419.
DO 640 J=2,JM 420.
COSV(J) = .5*(COSP(J-1)+COSP(J)) 421.
DXV(J) = .5*(DXP(J-1)+DXP(J)) 422.
640 DYV(J) = RADIUS*(LAT(J)-LAT(J-1)) 423.
DYP(1) = .5*DYV(2) 424.
DYP(JM) = .5*DYV(JM) 425.
DXYP(1) = .5*DXV(2)*DYP(1) 426.
DXYP(JM)= .5*DXV(JM)*DYP(JM) 427.
DXYS(1) = 0. 428.
DXYS(JM) = DXYP(JM) 429.
DXYN(1) = DXYP(1) 430.
DXYN(JM) = 0. 431.
AREAG = DXYP(1)+DXYP(JM) 432.
DO 660 J=2,JM-1 433.
DYP(J) = .5*(DYV(J)+DYV(J+1)) 434.
DXYP(J) = .5*(DXV(J)+DXV(J+1))*DYP(J) 435.
DXYS(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 436.
DXYN(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 437.
660 AREAG = AREAG+DXYP(J) 438.
AREAG = AREAG*FIM 439.
RAVPS(1) = 0. 440.
RAVPN(JM) = 0. 441.
DO 680 J=2,JM 442.
DXYV(J) = DXYN(J-1)+DXYS(J) 443.
RAPVS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYV(J) 444.
RAPVN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYV(J) 445.
RAVPS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYP(J) 446.
680 RAVPN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYP(J-1) 447.
C**** CALCULATE CORIOLIS PARAMETER 448.
OMEGA = TWOPI*(EDPERD+EDPERY)/(EDPERD*EDPERY*SDAY) 449.
F(1) = -RADIUS*OMEGA*.5*COSP(2)*DXV(2) 450.
F(JM) = -F(1) 451.
DO 690 J=2,JM-1 452.
690 F(J) = OMEGA*(DXV(J)*DXV(J)-DXV(J+1)*DXV(J+1))/DLON 453.
CLAT_DG latitude of mid points of primary and sec. grid boxs (deg)
C**** latitudinal spacing depends on whether you have even spacing or
C**** a partial box at the pole
DLAT_DG=180./(JM-1) ! 1/2 box at pole for 4x5 and 7.8x10
C**** LATITUDES (degrees); used extensively in the diagn. print routines
LAT_DG(1,1)=-90.
LAT_DG(1,2)=-90.
LAT_DG(JM,1)=90.
DO J=2,JM-1
LAT_DG(J,1)=DLAT_DG*(J-FJEQ) ! primary (tracer) latitudes
END DO
DO J=2,JM
LAT_DG(J,2)=DLAT_DG*(J-JM/2-1) ! secondary (velocity) latitudes
END DO
RETURN 454.
END 455.
Click to expand...


The terms "spherical" and "coriolis" should give you a hint.

http://edgcm.columbia.edu/ModelII/modelII_source.zip
Click to expand...

Awww, isn't that cute.. His claim didn't hold water in thread where he originally posted that , so he goes here and makes a new thread just for it.

LOL, he just knows it's brilliant and he will not be denied.. Sure, sure, poopie pants. You googled a real gem there, shame no one can see it but you.

So, mr. climate modeler today cause it suits your needs, what do you think happens to climate models that do not show they are within the limits of an energy budget? Trenberth's to be exact, and that budget is made using a flat disk earth with 24/7 light.

Going to answer it this time or run and make a new thread about it?
 
We obviously know enough to realize that yet another warmist claim has bitten the dust.
 
OohPooPahDoo said:
gslack said:
So, mr. climate modeler today
Click to expand...

I model astrophysical systems.

cause it suits your needs, what do you think happens to climate models that do not show they are within the limits of an energy budget?
Click to expand...

You don't even know what that means.
Click to expand...

Sure ya do buddy sure ya do... Hey and ya know what? I model underwear for victorias secret .. yep.. it's true.. I guess there's a big fanbase out there for fat middle aged bald men...ROFL.

Well it seems I know enough to show you for the faker you are.. So I guess you know even less.. LOL. Astrophysical Modeler, tell me we didn't see that coming...ROFL
 
gslack said:
OohPooPahDoo said:
gslack said:
So, mr. climate modeler today
Click to expand...

I model astrophysical systems.

cause it suits your needs, what do you think happens to climate models that do not show they are within the limits of an energy budget?
Click to expand...

You don't even know what that means.
Click to expand...

Sure ya do buddy sure ya do... Hey and ya know what? I model underwear for victorias secret .. yep.. it's true.. I guess there's a big fanbase out there for fat middle aged bald men...ROFL.

Well it seems I know enough to show you for the faker you are.. So I guess you know even less.. LOL. Astrophysical Modeler, tell me we didn't see that coming...ROFL
Click to expand...
I believe I've mentioned it before.
 
OohPooPahDoo said:
gslack said:
OohPooPahDoo said:
I model astrophysical systems.



You don't even know what that means.
Click to expand...

Sure ya do buddy sure ya do... Hey and ya know what? I model underwear for victorias secret .. yep.. it's true.. I guess there's a big fanbase out there for fat middle aged bald men...ROFL.

Well it seems I know enough to show you for the faker you are.. So I guess you know even less.. LOL. Astrophysical Modeler, tell me we didn't see that coming...ROFL
Click to expand...
I believe I've mentioned it before.
Click to expand...

Sure and I believe it's BS no matter when you said it... See ya poopie pants, I got to get some work done.. Don't worry we are all laughing at you now...ROFL
 
OohPooPahDoo said:
I just thought I'd put this one to rest.

Moron deniers often make the claim that no GCM's model the Earth as a rotating sphere. THey are wrong.
SUBROUTINE GEOM 401.
C**** CALCULATE SPHERICAL GEOMETRY (for 4x5 or 7.8x10) 402.
C**** This is as in Model II'
INCLUDE 'BA94jalC9.COM'
COMMON U,V,T,P,Q 403.
DATA EDPERD/1./,EDPERY/365./ 404.
405.
LAT(1) = -.25*TWOPI 406.
LAT(JM) = -LAT(1) 407.
SINP(1) = -1. 408.
SINP(JM) = 1. 409.
COSP(1) = 0. 410.
COSP(JM) = 0. 411.
DXP(1) = 0. 412.
DXP(JM) = 0. 413.
FJEQ = .5*(1+JM) 414.
DO 620 J=2,JM-1 415.
LAT(J) = DLAT*(J-FJEQ) 416.
SINP(J) = SIN(LAT(J)) 417.
COSP(J) = COS(LAT(J)) 418.
620 DXP(J) = RADIUS*DLON*COSP(J) 419.
DO 640 J=2,JM 420.
COSV(J) = .5*(COSP(J-1)+COSP(J)) 421.
DXV(J) = .5*(DXP(J-1)+DXP(J)) 422.
640 DYV(J) = RADIUS*(LAT(J)-LAT(J-1)) 423.
DYP(1) = .5*DYV(2) 424.
DYP(JM) = .5*DYV(JM) 425.
DXYP(1) = .5*DXV(2)*DYP(1) 426.
DXYP(JM)= .5*DXV(JM)*DYP(JM) 427.
DXYS(1) = 0. 428.
DXYS(JM) = DXYP(JM) 429.
DXYN(1) = DXYP(1) 430.
DXYN(JM) = 0. 431.
AREAG = DXYP(1)+DXYP(JM) 432.
DO 660 J=2,JM-1 433.
DYP(J) = .5*(DYV(J)+DYV(J+1)) 434.
DXYP(J) = .5*(DXV(J)+DXV(J+1))*DYP(J) 435.
DXYS(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 436.
DXYN(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 437.
660 AREAG = AREAG+DXYP(J) 438.
AREAG = AREAG*FIM 439.
RAVPS(1) = 0. 440.
RAVPN(JM) = 0. 441.
DO 680 J=2,JM 442.
DXYV(J) = DXYN(J-1)+DXYS(J) 443.
RAPVS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYV(J) 444.
RAPVN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYV(J) 445.
RAVPS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYP(J) 446.
680 RAVPN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYP(J-1) 447.
C**** CALCULATE CORIOLIS PARAMETER 448.
OMEGA = TWOPI*(EDPERD+EDPERY)/(EDPERD*EDPERY*SDAY) 449.
F(1) = -RADIUS*OMEGA*.5*COSP(2)*DXV(2) 450.
F(JM) = -F(1) 451.
DO 690 J=2,JM-1 452.
690 F(J) = OMEGA*(DXV(J)*DXV(J)-DXV(J+1)*DXV(J+1))/DLON 453.
CLAT_DG latitude of mid points of primary and sec. grid boxs (deg)
C**** latitudinal spacing depends on whether you have even spacing or
C**** a partial box at the pole
DLAT_DG=180./(JM-1) ! 1/2 box at pole for 4x5 and 7.8x10
C**** LATITUDES (degrees); used extensively in the diagn. print routines
LAT_DG(1,1)=-90.
LAT_DG(1,2)=-90.
LAT_DG(JM,1)=90.
DO J=2,JM-1
LAT_DG(J,1)=DLAT_DG*(J-FJEQ) ! primary (tracer) latitudes
END DO
DO J=2,JM
LAT_DG(J,2)=DLAT_DG*(J-JM/2-1) ! secondary (velocity) latitudes
END DO
RETURN 454.
END 455.
Click to expand...
The terms "spherical" and "coriolis" should give you a hint.

http://edgcm.columbia.edu/ModelII/modelII_source.zip
Click to expand...

Do you have actual examples of people making this claim, or are we just supposed to be blinded by your brilliance?
 
Quantum Windbag said:
OohPooPahDoo said:
I just thought I'd put this one to rest.

Moron deniers often make the claim that no GCM's model the Earth as a rotating sphere. THey are wrong.
SUBROUTINE GEOM 401.
C**** CALCULATE SPHERICAL GEOMETRY (for 4x5 or 7.8x10) 402.
C**** This is as in Model II'
INCLUDE 'BA94jalC9.COM'
COMMON U,V,T,P,Q 403.
DATA EDPERD/1./,EDPERY/365./ 404.
405.
LAT(1) = -.25*TWOPI 406.
LAT(JM) = -LAT(1) 407.
SINP(1) = -1. 408.
SINP(JM) = 1. 409.
COSP(1) = 0. 410.
COSP(JM) = 0. 411.
DXP(1) = 0. 412.
DXP(JM) = 0. 413.
FJEQ = .5*(1+JM) 414.
DO 620 J=2,JM-1 415.
LAT(J) = DLAT*(J-FJEQ) 416.
SINP(J) = SIN(LAT(J)) 417.
COSP(J) = COS(LAT(J)) 418.
620 DXP(J) = RADIUS*DLON*COSP(J) 419.
DO 640 J=2,JM 420.
COSV(J) = .5*(COSP(J-1)+COSP(J)) 421.
DXV(J) = .5*(DXP(J-1)+DXP(J)) 422.
640 DYV(J) = RADIUS*(LAT(J)-LAT(J-1)) 423.
DYP(1) = .5*DYV(2) 424.
DYP(JM) = .5*DYV(JM) 425.
DXYP(1) = .5*DXV(2)*DYP(1) 426.
DXYP(JM)= .5*DXV(JM)*DYP(JM) 427.
DXYS(1) = 0. 428.
DXYS(JM) = DXYP(JM) 429.
DXYN(1) = DXYP(1) 430.
DXYN(JM) = 0. 431.
AREAG = DXYP(1)+DXYP(JM) 432.
DO 660 J=2,JM-1 433.
DYP(J) = .5*(DYV(J)+DYV(J+1)) 434.
DXYP(J) = .5*(DXV(J)+DXV(J+1))*DYP(J) 435.
DXYS(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 436.
DXYN(J) = .5*DXYP(J) 437.
660 AREAG = AREAG+DXYP(J) 438.
AREAG = AREAG*FIM 439.
RAVPS(1) = 0. 440.
RAVPN(JM) = 0. 441.
DO 680 J=2,JM 442.
DXYV(J) = DXYN(J-1)+DXYS(J) 443.
RAPVS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYV(J) 444.
RAPVN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYV(J) 445.
RAVPS(J) = .5*DXYS(J)/DXYP(J) 446.
680 RAVPN(J-1) = .5*DXYN(J-1)/DXYP(J-1) 447.
C**** CALCULATE CORIOLIS PARAMETER 448.
OMEGA = TWOPI*(EDPERD+EDPERY)/(EDPERD*EDPERY*SDAY) 449.
F(1) = -RADIUS*OMEGA*.5*COSP(2)*DXV(2) 450.
F(JM) = -F(1) 451.
DO 690 J=2,JM-1 452.
690 F(J) = OMEGA*(DXV(J)*DXV(J)-DXV(J+1)*DXV(J+1))/DLON 453.
CLAT_DG latitude of mid points of primary and sec. grid boxs (deg)
C**** latitudinal spacing depends on whether you have even spacing or
C**** a partial box at the pole
DLAT_DG=180./(JM-1) ! 1/2 box at pole for 4x5 and 7.8x10
C**** LATITUDES (degrees); used extensively in the diagn. print routines
LAT_DG(1,1)=-90.
LAT_DG(1,2)=-90.
LAT_DG(JM,1)=90.
DO J=2,JM-1
LAT_DG(J,1)=DLAT_DG*(J-FJEQ) ! primary (tracer) latitudes
END DO
DO J=2,JM
LAT_DG(J,2)=DLAT_DG*(J-JM/2-1) ! secondary (velocity) latitudes
END DO
RETURN 454.
END 455.
Click to expand...
The terms "spherical" and "coriolis" should give you a hint.

http://edgcm.columbia.edu/ModelII/modelII_source.zip
Click to expand...

Do you have actual examples of people making this claim, or are we just supposed to be blinded by your brilliance?
Click to expand...

Oh heck no,he's just been outed in the original thread where he posted that diversionary tactic, so now he tried to make anew thread just to show of his googling talent. Seems he thinks it's just way too brilliant even if it is irrelevant because they match trenberths 2-d flat disk earth energy budget anyway..

See he's a Astrophysical modeler don't ya know... LOL, more like an Astro-turf technician you ask me.
 
gslack said:
Quantum Windbag said:
OohPooPahDoo said:
I just thought I'd put this one to rest.

Moron deniers often make the claim that no GCM's model the Earth as a rotating sphere. THey are wrong.

The terms "spherical" and "coriolis" should give you a hint.

http://edgcm.columbia.edu/ModelII/modelII_source.zip
Click to expand...

Do you have actual examples of people making this claim, or are we just supposed to be blinded by your brilliance?
Click to expand...

Oh heck no,he's just been outed in the original thread where he posted that diversionary tactic, so now he tried to make anew thread just to show of his googling talent. Seems he thinks it's just way too brilliant even if it is irrelevant because they match trenberths 2-d flat disk earth energy budget anyway..

See he's a Astrophysical modeler don't ya know... LOL, more like an Astro-turf technician you ask me.
Click to expand...


The claim was made by SSDD that
"None of the current crop of models represent the earth as a rotating sphere."
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/294156-97-scientists-agree-again-8.html#post7262467

I've clearly proven him wrong.
 
gslack said:
[
Well it seems I know enough to show you for the faker you are.. So I guess you know even less.. LOL. Astrophysical Modeler, tell me we didn't see that coming...ROFL
Click to expand...

Maybe he is an astrophysical modeler. Someone has to put together those styrofoam ball solar systems that they sell in the hobby shops.
 
OohPooPahDoo said:
gslack said:
Quantum Windbag said:
Do you have actual examples of people making this claim, or are we just supposed to be blinded by your brilliance?
Click to expand...

Oh heck no,he's just been outed in the original thread where he posted that diversionary tactic, so now he tried to make anew thread just to show of his googling talent. Seems he thinks it's just way too brilliant even if it is irrelevant because they match trenberths 2-d flat disk earth energy budget anyway..

See he's a Astrophysical modeler don't ya know... LOL, more like an Astro-turf technician you ask me.
Click to expand...


The claim was made by SSDD that
"None of the current crop of models represent the earth as a rotating sphere."
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/294156-97-scientists-agree-again-8.html#post7262467

I've clearly proven him wrong.
Click to expand...

ROFL, no you have clearly proven yourself full of it. Astroturf tech..
 
The earth spins around?:eek:

Then why don't we all fly off into space?

Don't tell me you guys have fallen for that Heliocentric model of the solar system.

:cuckoo:
 
SSDD said:
OohPooPahDoo said:
[


The claim was made by SSDD that
"None of the current crop of models represent the earth as a rotating sphere."
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/294156-97-scientists-agree-again-8.html#post7262467

I've clearly proven him wrong.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my question. Why model a spinning earth if it's going to be receiving wesk twilight across its entire surface 24 hours a day?
Click to expand...


That isn't how the model describe by Hansen et al. (1983) models the incoming radiation. If you look at the top of the second column of text on the page marked 619, you'll see they describe how the reflection and transmission of light depends on zenith angle and optical depth.

I'm curious, did you actually bother to research any of the actual computer models, or did you just go with what the blog told you to think? Because you clearly didn't look at the Hansen et al. (1983) model.
 
OohPooPahDoo said:
SSDD said:
OohPooPahDoo said:
[


The claim was made by SSDD that
"None of the current crop of models represent the earth as a rotating sphere."
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/294156-97-scientists-agree-again-8.html#post7262467

I've clearly proven him wrong.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my question. Why model a spinning earth if it's going to be receiving wesk twilight across its entire surface 24 hours a day?
Click to expand...


That isn't how the model describe by Hansen et al. (1983) models the incoming radiation. If you look at the top of the second column of text on the page marked 619, you'll see they describe how the reflection and transmission of light depends on zenith angle and optical depth.

I'm curious, did you actually bother to research any of the actual computer models, or did you just go with what the blog told you to think? Because you clearly didn't look at the Hansen et al. (1983) model.
Click to expand...

Translation; blah, blah, blah,...

Nice excuse making socko, you got caught faking it again.. You internet physicists crack me up..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Animals are....

< Previous Thread

Climate Game Changers

Next Thread >

Latest Discussions

P
Jew Hatred cannot be tolerated in America
Replies
9
Views
46
TNHarley
TNHarley
Robert W
Would you like to know the true Civil War History? This is your chance.
3 4 5
Replies
94
Views
744
TheParser
T
L
Let’s Prohibit the Swastika as an Avator
8 9 10
Replies
197
Views
1K
braalian
braalian
marvin martian
The leftist who demanded free snacks at her Hamas rally has been identified!
2
Replies
29
Views
231
my2¢
my2¢
DGS49
Democrats and the Abortion Issue
16 17 18
Replies
343
Views
1K
schmidlap
schmidlap
View more…

Forum List

Back
Top