Next Time You Leftards Use Politifact as a Fact Check, We’re Going to Mock You Silly

[BULLDOG]

When has fox or Alex Jones had unaltered quotes in their proper context?

Don't play stupid with me. If all you are going to do is make asinine comments, then just don't bother commenting at all.

In the the past few days where CNN and the NYT have produced completely false stories, you want to make dumb ass comments like yours, and pretend they have merit??

When has fox or Alex Jones had unaltered quotes in their proper context?

 

[Erinwltr]

Tell us where YOU go to check facts.

I go to a variety of sites. I certainly don't go to a fake fact checker whose only purpose is to give cover to leftist memes, news, figures etc.

Just for the heck of it, name two.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Democrats have historically wanted to confiscate guns That's a fact junior.

The dems invented the euphemistic term 'assault weapon" just to hide the fact that they want to confiscate all shotguns, pistols, rifles, you name it.

I'm not really sure how many of them actually want to confiscate guns. Like many of the things dems make campaign issues out of, they see guns as just another vehicle to divide the nation and agitate voters, in order to gain votes and win elections.

Whatever issue Democrat politicians can invent to make themselves look like the only ones who can keep the barbarians at the gates, they will run with.

Whether it's climate change, health care, education, your work place, getting rid of all the pointy objects in your home, or the news you watch, or entertainment you engage in, you name it. We are all going to freaking die.... unless we turn over complete and utter control over everything to the dems, then, and only then, can they make us all safe, healthy and secure from ourselves, and the outside world.

Well make up your mind. You just said Democrats want to take your guns, but then said you don't really know that. RWNJs have been accusing Democrats of coming for their guns for years with no reason to believe that is true

Dems historically have tried to take guns from people that's a fact.

 

[BULLDOG]

Democrats have historically wanted to confiscate guns That's a fact junior.

The dems invented the euphemistic term 'assault weapon" just to hide the fact that they want to confiscate all shotguns, pistols, rifles, you name it.

I'm not really sure how many of them actually want to confiscate guns. Like many of the things dems make campaign issues out of, they see guns as just another vehicle to divide the nation and agitate voters, in order to gain votes and win elections.

Whatever issue Democrat politicians can invent to make themselves look like the only ones who can keep the barbarians at the gates, they will run with.

Whether it's climate change, health care, education, your work place, getting rid of all the pointy objects in your home, or the news you watch, or entertainment you engage in, you name it. We are all going to freaking die.... unless we turn over complete and utter control over everything to the dems, then, and only then, can they make us all safe, healthy and secure from ourselves, and the outside world.

Well make up your mind. You just said Democrats want to take your guns, but then said you don't really know that. RWNJs have been accusing Democrats of coming for their guns for years with no reason to believe that is true

Dems historically have tried to take guns from people that's a fact.

That is the rhetoric. Looks like it might come true if you keep up your childish bullshit. I suspect you will be one of the first crazies to have them confiscated.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Just for the heck of it, name two.

This isn't a Sarah Palin moment and I have nothing to prove to you. The sites I look at are varied and they run a gamut of
differing views.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

So you go nowhere and care nothing about facts just as I figured. Thanks for playing

Aww...I didn't give you the answer you wanted me to, did I.

 

[August West]

Just for the heck of it, name two.

This isn't a Sarah Palin moment and I have nothing to prove to you. The sites I look at are varied and they run a gamut of
differing views.

Looking at the sites gives us plenty of information to sort through but still that`s not a "fact check".

 

[Erinwltr]

Just for the heck of it, name two.

This isn't a Sarah Palin moment and I have nothing to prove to you. The sites I look at are varied and they run a gamut of
differing views.

"You betcah."

 

[miketx]

That was before the gun nut's constant accusations convinced him it might be worthwhile to do that. Congratulations, your constant whining about something that didn't exist at the time has produced results.

This guy's as big a liar as some of the stains here.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Looking at the sites gives us plenty of information to sort through but still that`s not a "fact check".

I don't know what to tell you. Snopes, Politifact, etc. disingenuously portray themselves as disinterested straight down the middle purveyor of facts. That's not exactly true.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Looking at the sites gives us plenty of information to sort through but still that`s not a "fact check".

I don't know what to tell you. Snopes, Politifact, etc. disingenuously portray themselves as disinterested straight down the middle purveyor of facts. That's not exactly true.

Why, because they find that Rump is a liar, cheat, has no scruple, no real moral fabric? And they find the same thing with you Rumple Followers that try and cover for him? Sounds to me like they are dead on usually.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Democrats have historically wanted to confiscate guns That's a fact junior.

The dems invented the euphemistic term 'assault weapon" just to hide the fact that they want to confiscate all shotguns, pistols, rifles, you name it.

I'm not really sure how many of them actually want to confiscate guns. Like many of the things dems make campaign issues out of, they see guns as just another vehicle to divide the nation and agitate voters, in order to gain votes and win elections.

Whatever issue Democrat politicians can invent to make themselves look like the only ones who can keep the barbarians at the gates, they will run with.

Whether it's climate change, health care, education, your work place, getting rid of all the pointy objects in your home, or the news you watch, or entertainment you engage in, you name it. We are all going to freaking die.... unless we turn over complete and utter control over everything to the dems, then, and only then, can they make us all safe, healthy and secure from ourselves, and the outside world.

Well make up your mind. You just said Democrats want to take your guns, but then said you don't really know that. RWNJs have been accusing Democrats of coming for their guns for years with no reason to believe that is true

Dems historically have tried to take guns from people that's a fact.

That is the rhetoric. Looks like it might come true if you keep up your childish bullshit. I suspect you will be one of the first crazies to have them confiscated.

It's not rhetoric it's a history that you are a part of your party's history.

 

[deanrd]

That was before the gun nut's constant accusations convinced him it might be worthwhile to do that. Congratulations, your constant whining about something that didn't exist at the time has produced results.

There's nothing new it's a known fact Democrats have always wanted to take all guns

If that were true, then why the sudden shock when Beto agrees with you?

It's a historical fact dems have always wanted to take guns away especially from blacks.It's not some surprising news.

It's historically been a claim that gun nuts and right wingers have made, but there has never been any proof to back up that claim. Again, It was your unrelenting efforts that convinced Beto to consider if it might be worthwhile to do that.

Democrats have historically wanted to confiscate guns That's a fact junior.

And at the other end of the spectrum, we have Republicans who fight for the rights of school shooters to carry even bigger weapons and larger magazines.
I think we should be somewhere in the middle.

 

[Meathead]

Why, because they find that Rump is a liar, cheat, has no scruple, no real moral fabric? And they find the same thing with you Rumple Followers that try and cover for him? Sounds to me like they are dead on usually.

Do you honestly think anyone is looking to the media or the party of Hillary Clinton for scruples and morality? Seriously, fuck off.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Why, because they find that Rump is a liar, cheat, has no scruple, no real moral fabric? And they find the same thing with you Rumple Followers that try and cover for him? Sounds to me like they are dead on usually.

Do you honestly think anyone is looking to the media or the party of Hillary Clinton for scruples and morality? Seriously, fuck off.

Your lack of morality and scruples is noted. We already know you are voting for Rump even if Jesus Christ were running against him.

 

[karpenter]

Beto sure does get you into some kind of sweaty tizzy. It's quite comical to watch.

What's Comical To Watch
Are The Faces Of The Democrat Party
And All Your "Candidates"

HA-HAA !!

 

[Leo123]

Why, because they find that Rump is a liar, cheat, has no scruple, no real moral fabric? And they find the same thing with you Rumple Followers that try and cover for him? Sounds to me like they are dead on usually.

Do you honestly think anyone is looking to the media or the party of Hillary Clinton for scruples and morality? Seriously, fuck off.

Your lack of morality and scruples is noted. We already know you are voting for Rump even if Jesus Christ were running against him.

Rump....That's where your head is.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Why, because they find that Rump is a liar, cheat, has no scruple, no real moral fabric? And they find the same thing with you Rumple Followers that try and cover for him? Sounds to me like they are dead on usually.

Do you honestly think anyone is looking to the media or the party of Hillary Clinton for scruples and morality? Seriously, fuck off.

Your lack of morality and scruples is noted. We already know you are voting for Rump even if Jesus Christ were running against him.

Rump....That's where your head is.

Rump before he got into office

Rump after he got into office

Rump in Nov 2020

Rump on Jan 21, 2021

 

[Meathead]

Why, because they find that Rump is a liar, cheat, has no scruple, no real moral fabric? And they find the same thing with you Rumple Followers that try and cover for him? Sounds to me like they are dead on usually.

Do you honestly think anyone is looking to the media or the party of Hillary Clinton for scruples and morality? Seriously, fuck off.

Your lack of morality and scruples is noted. We already know you are voting for Rump even if Jesus Christ were running against him.

Seriously, if I feel the need for moral guidance, I'll get back to you, and you can consult me on grammar if you wish

 

[Wapasha]

As long as news accounts found in the internet search are citing actual facts, linking unaltered quotes, in their proper context, or video from public statements, why does it matter if it's Alex Jones or the NYT, or any other source??

It matters because it's terrifically easy to slant and distort a story, even if you're using "facts". You can easily avoid, ignore and mangle any number of "facts", you can take them out of context, you can do all kinds of things.

A "major" press organization can't get away with that nearly as easy as can a small, niche site that caters to ideological purists who only want "facts" that they like.

That's not to say that major media doesn't do it to a degree too; but the niche sites do it AGGRESSIVELY and CONSISTENTLY, on both ends.

I don't want a cherry-picked article, and I don't know why so many are so willing to play along.
.

Which is why I said "citing actual facts, linking unaltered quotes, in their proper context, or video"

From my own personal experiences, I have watched live events, where a person made specific comments. Then when I want to cite those specific comments here, it's near impossible to find an internet site that accurately quotes in print, or shows an unaltered video for the specific comments I am trying to refer to in a post.

So sometimes after I have searched all over, and the specific quotes or video that I'm looking for, can only be found on some off the wall site, or worse yet, a controversial site that one side of the isle or the other hates. Then when I post the link, I'm ridiculed for trying to promote the site, when all I want is the video, or the quotes.

Sometimes, I might find all the video and quotes on a site the left hates, and they will complain about it, and disregard the video and quotes as fake, even though the site, which I used that was linking those quotes and videos from the NYT, WaPo, Politico, MSNBC, etc...

The point is, why does the left trash my link, because I found all the pertinent quotes and videos on Fox News, if the story cites a bunch of news orgs that are trusted by the left?

People need to get over their partisan bias, stop whining so much, and just debate like adults.