Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Obviously, if it wasn't different you wouldn't have needed to change my word!!!I was right. It's different. Somehow. It just is.Then why are you crybabies always whining about a media bias against CON$ervoFascism?
Predictably, you can't tell the difference between CON$ervoFascISM, a political philosophy, and CON$ervoFascIST, a person!You mean like by calling people "CON$ervofascists"?
Predictably, you will tell me that's different. Somehow. It just is.
you really are too fucking stupidObviously, if it wasn't different you wouldn't have needed to change my word!!!I was right. It's different. Somehow. It just is.Predictably, you can't tell the difference between CON$ervoFascISM, a political philosophy, and CON$ervoFascIST, a person!
And IF pigs had wings.....you really are too fucking stupidObviously, if it wasn't different you wouldn't have needed to change my word!!!I was right. It's different. Somehow. It just is.
if you refer to people as following a political philosophy then you are calling THEM "ists" of that philosophy
moron
Obviously, if it wasn't different you wouldn't have needed to change my word!!!I was right. It's different. Somehow. It just is.Predictably, you can't tell the difference between CON$ervoFascISM, a political philosophy, and CON$ervoFascIST, a person!
you really are too fucking stupid for wordsAnd IF pigs had wings.....you really are too fucking stupidObviously, if it wasn't different you wouldn't have needed to change my word!!!
if you refer to people as following a political philosophy then you are calling THEM "ists" of that philosophy
moron
My only use of the word in this thread was in reference to a perceived media bias against the PHILOSOPHY!
AHHHH yes, once again the sniveling little coward DumbCon snipes in hiding without comment from his spider hole.Gee, wouldn't the Fairness Doctrine require them all to give you CON$ equal time?Of couse there is no media bias. Thats why its unfair for Fox News to slant right when ABC, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, Newsweek, most of all major Newspapers, most of all major magazines, and all of Hollywood are totally and unequivocally HONEST, unbiased and completely fair in their reporting and portrayal of conservative ideas and politics.
Why yes, yes it would.
And aren't CON$ against the fairness Doctrine?
Why yes, yes they are.
Then wouldn't that mean CON$ are full of shit when they whine like little children about media bias?
Why yes, yes it would.
Newsweek shows Obama as Hindu god.
Does this mean that he's not a muslin?
i dont think QW was ever in that camp in the first placeNewsweek shows Obama as Hindu god.
Does this mean that he's not a muslin?
BTW, Palin made some sort of call for censorship on Thanksgiving......
A Thanksgiving Message to All 57 States | Facebook“Hope springs eternal” as the poet says. Let’s hope that perhaps, just maybe, they might get it right next time. When we the people are effective in holding America’s free press accountable for responsible and truthful reporting, then we shall all have even more to be thankful for!
I dun think Palin is representative of the majority of conservatives -- for starters, she has zero grasp of the First Amendment. But no one can claim with a straight face that there are no media outlets with a conservative bias, or that only liberals complain about bad press.
i agreei dont think QW was ever in that camp in the first placeDoes this mean that he's not a muslin?
I generally come down in the "He went to church because it was politically expedient" camp.
First of all, I was replying to DumbCon's cowardly attack of that post without exposing himself to public debate, so the post was clearly directed to DumbCon and not myself.AHHHH yes, once again the sniveling little coward DumbCon snipes in hiding without comment from his spider hole.Gee, wouldn't the Fairness Doctrine require them all to give you CON$ equal time?
Why yes, yes it would.
And aren't CON$ against the fairness Doctrine?
Why yes, yes they are.
Then wouldn't that mean CON$ are full of shit when they whine like little children about media bias?
Why yes, yes it would.
Did you know answering your own posts is a sign of severe mental instability? Do you also believe the government has your best interests at heart? If so, I would suggest seeing a neurologist and requesting a lobotomy, it would reduce your danger to intelligent life on Earth.
The fairness doctrine would require stations to carry programming their viewers do not want, all because liberals are not as popular as Rush Limbaugh, and they don't think that is fair.
So basically you are accusing Obama of being a typical CON$ervative politician.i dont think QW was ever in that camp in the first placeDoes this mean that he's not a muslin?
I generally come down in the "He went to church because it was politically expedient" camp.
First of all, I was replying to DumbCon's cowardly attack of that post without exposing himself to public debate, so the post was clearly directed to DumbCon and not myself.AHHHH yes, once again the sniveling little coward DumbCon snipes in hiding without comment from his spider hole.
Did you know answering your own posts is a sign of severe mental instability? Do you also believe the government has your best interests at heart? If so, I would suggest seeing a neurologist and requesting a lobotomy, it would reduce your danger to intelligent life on Earth.
The fairness doctrine would require stations to carry programming their viewers do not want, all because liberals are not as popular as Rush Limbaugh, and they don't think that is fair.
And regarding the F D, then why are you crybabies habitually whining about a Liberal bias in the media if it's what their viewers want? CON$ want CON$ervative views on the "Liberal media" but don't want Liberal views on CON$ervative media.
So basically you are accusing Obama of being a typical CON$ervative politician.i dont think QW was ever in that camp in the first place
I generally come down in the "He went to church because it was politically expedient" camp.
WTF?
meh, i dont see this as media biasThere is no media bias.
There is no media bias.
There is no media bias.
There is no media bias.
There is no media bias.
Hindus outraged at Newsweek Obama cover | Video | abc7news.com
Maybe if I keep repeating it I can believe it the same way the lefties do.
Imagine the same magazine doing essentially the same story about Bush and tell me what they would have used as the cover photo and the title. I would be willing to bet serious money that it would not include the word god being used positively.
First of all, I was replying to DumbCon's cowardly attack of that post without exposing himself to public debate, so the post was clearly directed to DumbCon and not myself.AHHHH yes, once again the sniveling little coward DumbCon snipes in hiding without comment from his spider hole.
Did you know answering your own posts is a sign of severe mental instability? Do you also believe the government has your best interests at heart? If so, I would suggest seeing a neurologist and requesting a lobotomy, it would reduce your danger to intelligent life on Earth.
The fairness doctrine would require stations to carry programming their viewers do not want, all because liberals are not as popular as Rush Limbaugh, and they don't think that is fair.
And regarding the F D, then why are you crybabies habitually whining about a Liberal bias in the media if it's what their viewers want? CON$ want CON$ervative views on the "Liberal media" but don't want Liberal views on CON$ervative media.
If you paid attention my reply was addressed to DumbCon who was in HIDING.First of all, I was replying to DumbCon's cowardly attack of that post without exposing himself to public debate, so the post was clearly directed to DumbCon and not myself.
And regarding the F D, then why are you crybabies habitually whining about a Liberal bias in the media if it's what their viewers want? CON$ want CON$ervative views on the "Liberal media" but don't want Liberal views on CON$ervative media.
I don't know about anyone else, but I did not see anything by DiveCon, or anyone besides yourself, in that post. I heartily recommend that lobotomy, you are too far gone to save.
Also, I could care less what any media outlet chooses to show. If I like it, I will watch it, if not, I won't. That is how most intelligent people control the content on their televisions and radios, only idiots need the government to do it for them. this proves that anyone who supports the fairness doctrine is an idiot.
6 Is the biblical number of man as in 666I'm sorry, but I see SIX arms...
Kali has 8;
Shiva has 5.
Not sure WHAT god he's supposed to be looking like, but it's a fail, on pretty much EVERYONE's part!
On the left, it's Finance/Economy, the Military, and Foreign Policy;
on the right, it's housing, peace and some weird-assed button, with a tube, leading to his ass...
WTF is THAT about?!?
First of all, I was replying to DumbCon's cowardly attack of that post without exposing himself to public debate, so the post was clearly directed to DumbCon and not myself.Did you know answering your own posts is a sign of severe mental instability? Do you also believe the government has your best interests at heart? If so, I would suggest seeing a neurologist and requesting a lobotomy, it would reduce your danger to intelligent life on Earth.
The fairness doctrine would require stations to carry programming their viewers do not want, all because liberals are not as popular as Rush Limbaugh, and they don't think that is fair.
And regarding the F D, then why are you crybabies habitually whining about a Liberal bias in the media if it's what their viewers want? CON$ want CON$ervative views on the "Liberal media" but don't want Liberal views on CON$ervative media.
If you paid attention my reply was addressed to DumbCon who was in HIDING.First of all, I was replying to DumbCon's cowardly attack of that post without exposing himself to public debate, so the post was clearly directed to DumbCon and not myself.
And regarding the F D, then why are you crybabies habitually whining about a Liberal bias in the media if it's what their viewers want? CON$ want CON$ervative views on the "Liberal media" but don't want Liberal views on CON$ervative media.
I don't know about anyone else, but I did not see anything by DiveCon, or anyone besides yourself, in that post. I heartily recommend that lobotomy, you are too far gone to save.
Also, I could care less what any media outlet chooses to show. If I like it, I will watch it, if not, I won't. That is how most intelligent people control the content on their televisions and radios, only idiots need the government to do it for them. this proves that anyone who supports the fairness doctrine is an idiot.
And anyone who complains about Liberal media bias and opposes the Fairness Doctrine is an idiot.
Didn't you whine about media bias in your OP? Why yes, yes you did.
