New York hospital shooter used New York legal, AR-15, 10 round magazines..

[2aguy]

this is why's the anti gunners will never allow Americans to have any size magazines.....they say they just want any magazine that holds more than 10 round magazines, and then they will be happy....

They are lying......this Dr. shooter used 10 round magazines to shoot these people from a New York compliant AR-15 rifle.......

So, no...they will not stop at 10 round magazines, they will not stop at rifles that hold those magazines..this shooter could have used a lever action rifle or a revolver to do his shooting......


Magazine limits did not save lives here......rifle bans did not save lives here....there isn't no reason to ban either item...except for an irrational, nonsensical fear of guns.....

Amd....it was a gun free zone......only the shooter was allowed to have a gun.

Remember the other hospital where the Dr. broke the rules and brought his own gun, illegally into his gun free hospital...and used it to stop another masss shooter....stopping the killing long before the police arrived...

BREAKING: NY Hospital Shooter Used NY Legal AR-15 - The Truth About Guns

MSNBC is reporting that the shooting at the NY hospital this afternoon used an AR-15 that had been “modified” such that it didn’t have a pistol grip and used a magazinewith only 10 round capacity. Those changes mean only one thing: the rifle was legal under the NY SAFE Act, the assault weapon ban, and legal in New York.

The city of New York (where the shooting took place) has additional restrictions on firearms, including licensing for rifles and shotguns within city limits.

The fact that a properly modified and neutered AR-15 was used in a “mass shooting” event such as this will no doubt raise questions. For those in the pro-gun camp the typical response will probably be to claim that this is proof that things like the NY SAFE act doesn’t work, and “assault weapons” bans are meaningless attempts to make gunslook less scary without actually making them less deadly. Those in the anti-gun camp will no doubt claim that this is proof that the NY SAFE Act and assault weapons ban aren’t strong enough, and need additional regulations to promote safety.

 

[BlackFlag]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

 

[Divine Wind]

this is why's the anti gunners will never allow Americans to have any size magazines.....they say they just want any magazine that holds more than 10 round magazines, and then they will be happy....

They are lying......this Dr. shooter used 10 round magazines to shoot these people from a New York compliant AR-15 rifle.......

So, no...they will not stop at 10 round magazines, they will not stop at rifles that hold those magazines..this shooter could have used a lever action rifle or a revolver to do his shooting......


Magazine limits did not save lives here......rifle bans did not save lives here....there isn't no reason to ban either item...except for an irrational, nonsensical fear of guns.....

Amd....it was a gun free zone......only the shooter was allowed to have a gun.

Remember the other hospital where the Dr. broke the rules and brought his own gun, illegally into his gun free hospital...and used it to stop another masss shooter....stopping the killing long before the police arrived...

BREAKING: NY Hospital Shooter Used NY Legal AR-15 - The Truth About Guns

MSNBC is reporting that the shooting at the NY hospital this afternoon used an AR-15 that had been “modified” such that it didn’t have a pistol grip and used a magazinewith only 10 round capacity. Those changes mean only one thing: the rifle was legal under the NY SAFE Act, the assault weapon ban, and legal in New York.

The city of New York (where the shooting took place) has additional restrictions on firearms, including licensing for rifles and shotguns within city limits.

The fact that a properly modified and neutered AR-15 was used in a “mass shooting” event such as this will no doubt raise questions. For those in the pro-gun camp the typical response will probably be to claim that this is proof that things like the NY SAFE act doesn’t work, and “assault weapons” bans are meaningless attempts to make gunslook less scary without actually making them less deadly. Those in the anti-gun camp will no doubt claim that this is proof that the NY SAFE Act and assault weapons ban aren’t strong enough, and need additional regulations to promote safety.

Agreed.

 

[Divine Wind]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

Or driven a truck through a school yard. After you ban all guns, start working on cars and swimming pools. Thousands of kids die every year because of those.

 

[Geaux4it]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

Or this

-Geaux
-----------

 

[BlackFlag]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

Or driven a truck through a school yard. After you ban all guns, start working on cars and swimming pools. Thousands of kids die every year because of those.

Yeah those have been pretty heavily regulated, with people still working on new regs. Good point. I agree with you that dangerous things should be regulated.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

If only that doctor had been packin' - right?

 

[Divine Wind]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

Or driven a truck through a school yard. After you ban all guns, start working on cars and swimming pools. Thousands of kids die every year because of those.

Yeah those have been pretty heavily regulated, with people still working on new regs. Good point. I agree with you that dangerous things should be regulated.

Not enough since thousands die every year. Since neither are Constitutional amendments, why don't you advocate banning them? Do you hate kids?

 

[BlackFlag]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

Or driven a truck through a school yard. After you ban all guns, start working on cars and swimming pools. Thousands of kids die every year because of those.

Yeah those have been pretty heavily regulated, with people still working on new regs. Good point. I agree with you that dangerous things should be regulated.

Not enough since thousands die every year. Since neither are Constitutional amendments, why don't you advocate banning them? Do you hate kids?

Cars and pools serve purposes other than to inflict life-threatening harm. But regulations are certainly needed for safety.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

I can change a mag in three seconds or less.

 

[Divine Wind]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

Or driven a truck through a school yard. After you ban all guns, start working on cars and swimming pools. Thousands of kids die every year because of those.

Yeah those have been pretty heavily regulated, with people still working on new regs. Good point. I agree with you that dangerous things should be regulated.

Not enough since thousands die every year. Since neither are Constitutional amendments, why don't you advocate banning them? Do you hate kids?

Cars and pools serve purposes other than to inflict life-threatening harm. But regulations are certainly needed for safety.

Same for firearms. So you think the fun you have with cars and private swimming pools is worth the loss of thousands of kids? Interesting. What other material possessions do you think are worth the the lives our our nation's children?

CDC Childhood Injury Report | Child Safety and Injury Prevention| CDC Injury Center
Unintentional injuries—such as those caused by burns, drowning, falls, poisoning and road traffic—are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children in the United States. Each year, among those 0 to 19 years of age, more than 12,000 people die from unintentional injuries and more than 9.2 million are treated in emergency departments for nonfatal injuries.

 

[MaryL]

Yeah. The pro gun people remind me of the people that defend illegal aliens. That's right, this weird logic of theirs. We need them, why? It's what America is about? There is a parallel here. We don't NEED either and both are harmful, and yet certain groups put on the blinkers and use patriotism and use money and political maneuvering to further their cause despite the harm they do, PACs are powerful things.

 

[BlackFlag]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

I can change a mag in three seconds or less.

Nice 3 second window for you to be taken out then.

 

[Divine Wind]

Yeah. The pro gun people remind me of the people that defend illegal aliens. That's right, this weird logic of theirs. We need them, why? It's what America is about? There is a parallel here. We don't NEED either and both are harmful, and yet certain groups put on the blinkers and use patriotism and use money and political maneuvering to further their cause despite the harm they do, PACs are powerful things.

Which amendment is the "illegal alien" one?

 

[BlackFlag]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

Or driven a truck through a school yard. After you ban all guns, start working on cars and swimming pools. Thousands of kids die every year because of those.

Yeah those have been pretty heavily regulated, with people still working on new regs. Good point. I agree with you that dangerous things should be regulated.

Not enough since thousands die every year. Since neither are Constitutional amendments, why don't you advocate banning them? Do you hate kids?

Cars and pools serve purposes other than to inflict life-threatening harm. But regulations are certainly needed for safety.

Same for firearms.

Good. Most argue, not enough.

 

[Divine Wind]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

I can change a mag in three seconds or less.

Nice 3 second window for you to be taken out then.

By who? A good man with a gun?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Yeah. The pro gun people remind me of the people that defend illegal aliens. That's right, this weird logic of theirs. We need them, why? It's what America is about? There is a parallel here. We don't NEED either and both are harmful, and yet certain groups put on the blinkers and use patriotism and use money and political maneuvering to further their cause despite the harm they do, PACs are powerful things.

Mmmmm....no.
One is a Constitutional right. The other is illegal.

 

[BlackFlag]

Thank goodness. Who knows how many he would have killed if he'd been able to get a larger magazine?

I can change a mag in three seconds or less.

Nice 3 second window for you to be taken out then.

By who? A good man with a gun?

In the close quarters of a hospital building? By whoever's nearby.

 

[westwall]

If only that doctor had been packin' - right?

Nope, if only another doctor had been packin. Fight fire with fire, but no, you want to fight fire with piss. Real effective there looney tune.

 

[MaryL]

Yeah. The pro gun people remind me of the people that defend illegal aliens. That's right, this weird logic of theirs. We need them, why? It's what America is about? There is a parallel here. We don't NEED either and both are harmful, and yet certain groups put on the blinkers and use patriotism and use money and political maneuvering to further their cause despite the harm they do, PACs are powerful things.

Which amendment is the "illegal alien" one?

Common here, people fineness laws to support illegal aliens or guns, illegal being pejorative, we aren't supposed to say that because of liberal group think. And Conservative group think would excuse mass shootings, illegal possession of firearms, Sandy Hook and live in a deluded group think world like liberals.