New York Attorney General Letitia James Want $37M Fine In Trump Civil Fraud Case.

The banks accepted an independent financial opinion of the worth if his property.
HE DIDN'T MAKE THEM.
No harm
No foul.
No victims beside you blood-thirsty rotten fucking Stalinist PIGS
No victim except Trump after the Court rules and makes him bend over and grab his ankles for the 300+ million judgment and the dismantling of his companies. :funnyface:
 
Judge Resinds Permission For Trump To Give His Permission To Give His Own Closing Argument At His Civil Fraud Trial.


EW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump won’t make his own closing argument in his New York civil business fraud trial after his lawyers objected to the judge’s insistence that the former president would stick to “relevant” matters.

Judge Arthur Engoron rescinded permission on Wednesday, a day ahead of closing arguments in the trial.

The trial could cost Trump hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties and strip him of his ability to do business in New York. His lawyers had signaled Thursday that he planned to take the extraordinary step of delivering a summation personally, in addition to arguments from his legal team.

P01135809 giving the final argument just would allowed him lie his ass off.
 
Last edited:
You fucking demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombies are OUT OF CONTROL

You're deplorable sack of orange shit. One more time, you worship a Marxist/LeninstStalinist fuck stick by the name of Putin.

P01135809 committed fraud. He lied on mandatory reports.
 
Last edited:
You're deplorable sack of orange shit. One more time, you worship a Marxist/LeninstStalinist fuck stick by the name of Putin.

P01135809 committed fraud. He lied on mandatory reports.
Awwwww, a triggered communist.
Ain't that cute? :itsok:
 
Trump's Court-Appointed Monitor Tells Judge Company Gave 'Incomplete' And 'Inconsisten' Disclosures With 'Errors'.


The court-appointed monitor overseeing Donald Trump's businesses told a judge on Friday that the former president's financial information has contained "incomplete" or "inconsistent" disclosures containing "errors."

"I have identified certain deficiencies in the financial information that I have reviewed, including disclosures that are either incomplete, present results inconsistently, and/or contain errors," former federal judge Barbara Jones, tasked with scrutinizing the former president's business empire, wrote in a 12-page letter.

Though she described Trump and his businesses as "cooperative" with her investigation, Jones added that "information required to be submitted to me pursuant to the terms of the monitorship order and review protocol has, at times, been lacking in completeness and timeliness."


The judge sent her update to Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, who appointed her as a monitor in November 2022.
 

Forget $250M. New York’s AG Now Wants Trump To Pay $370M For Civil fFraud.​


EW YORK — When Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial began in October, he was facing potential penalties of up to $250 million. Now, with the trial about to wrap up, New York’s attorney general wants to tack on an extra $120 million.

Attorney General Tish James’ office on Friday asked the judge overseeing the case to fine Trump and his business empire $370 million plus interest, saying the evidence introduced during the two-and-a-half month trial justifies increasing the penalties that James initially sought.

James’ office sought to prove during the trial that Trump exaggerated the value of his assets — and inflated his net worth — to obtain favorable terms from banks and insurers, and in a court filing on Friday, she said it was the money saved by those terms that dictated the largest portion of the penalty requested by her office.
Hey, retard. Make up your mind. Is it $37 million or $370 million.
 
The judge made a legal error. One of several.

The moron doesn’t even know the actual meaning of “fraud.”

Neither do assholes like you.
You are not qualified to assess the job performance of judges, but your uninformed opinion is duly noted.

:auiqs.jpg:
 
You are not qualified to assess the job performance of judges, but your uninformed opinion is duly noted.
Actually, I am. Hit your guesswork as to what I am or am not qualified to do demonstrates that you speak without a factual basis. You do that all too often.

But, being the stereotypical big-hearted conservative that I am, I am going to grant you an opportunity here:

In the formerly great state of New York, including both civil case elements and criminal case elements, provide any actual legal example of “fraud” which doesn’t include a need for a “victim.”

Go.
 
In the formerly great state of New York, including both civil case elements and criminal case elements, provide any actual legal example of “fraud” which doesn’t include a need for a “victim.”

Go.
As usual....YOU LOSE!

Falsifying Business Records: NY PL 175.10 and 175.15

While not as commonly prosecuted as Forgery, Grand Larceny or Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument, Falsifying Business Records in the First and Second Degrees, New York Penal Law sections 175.10 and 175.05 respectively, are extremely serious offenses. In fact, New York White Collar defense attorneys experienced in representing clients in Falsifying Business Record arrests and indictments can explain how easy it is for a savvy prosecutor to bump up a less serious crime into a felony case or find an otherwise insignificant act and develop a viable misdemeanor case.
 
As usual....YOU LOSE!

Falsifying Business Records: NY PL 175.10 and 175.15

While not as commonly prosecuted as Forgery, Grand Larceny or Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument, Falsifying Business Records in the First and Second Degrees, New York Penal Law sections 175.10 and 175.05 respectively, are extremely serious offenses. In fact, New York White Collar defense attorneys experienced in representing clients in Falsifying Business Record arrests and indictments can explain how easy it is for a savvy prosecutor to bump up a less serious crime into a felony case or find an otherwise insignificant act and develop a viable misdemeanor case.
You clipped some lawyers’ ad. And you said nothing about the elements.

That was the question.

You either lack sufficient information to brain the answer or you’re just lying again

Either way, as always, you lose.
 

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS

IN THE SECOND DEGREE

Penal Law § 175.05

(Committed on or after November 1, 1986)

The (specify) count is Falsifying Business Records in the Second Degree.

Under our law, a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the second degree when, with intent to defraud, he or she:

Select appropriate alternative:

makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or

alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or

omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he or she knows to be imposed upon him or her by law or by the nature of his or her position; or

prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise.

The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning:

ENTERPRISE means any entity of one or more persons, corporate or otherwise, public or private, engaged in business, commercial, professional, industrial, eleemosynary, social, political or governmental activity. 1

BUSINESS RECORD means any writing or article,

1707082965906.png

1 Penal Law § 175.00(1).
including computer data or a computer program, kept or maintained by an enterprise for the purpose of evidencing or reflecting its condition or activity. 2

INTENT means conscious objective or purpose. Thus a person acts with intent to defraud when his or her conscious objective or purpose is to do so.3

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all of the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, each of the following two elements:

1. That on or about (date) , in the county of (county) , the defendant, (defendant's name),
Select appropriate alternative:

made or caused a false entry in the business records

of an enterprise; or

altered, erased, obliterated, deleted, removed or destroyed a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or

omitted to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which the defendant knew to be imposed upon him/her by law or by the nature of his/her position; or

prevented the making of a true entry or caused the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise; and,

2. That the defendant did so with intent to defraud.

Our retarded pal, MangledDick, can also not explain how one can have any intent to defraud without intent to defraud someone.

Who is the “victim?”
 

Forum List

Back
Top